Her "calling out" anyone for anything is laughable.

Sounds like a well-adjusted person with loads of friends, too.

"Go devote more time on your fucked up obsession with a few mean lesbians" wasn't a very nice thing to say to Sam Fels

_________________

I bet it's real hard when you are menstruating.

_________________

#soccertough

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You

hey me too. instead of flopping, i pimp walk dbo's like i don't care.

IME, pretty much every transwoman online is that obsessive or more.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

You must have some experience.

_________________

Believe me, if you're following the goings-on of SJW's, these trannies are absolutely fucking legion within their ranks. It's incredible, really.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

Long story short: Online "violence" is okay if it is committed by a member of a disenfranchised minority.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down to get it!

Fixed

She went after Kobe Bryant. Now the war is on with Kobe fans. Bring back the war thread and alert @support.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

Remo?

_________________

Looks like zero safety is gonna need another terrabyte. In her defense , that guy did threaten to rape her.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Look, that's gross, and crass, and the guy's an asshole....so block him? If he keeps it up, yes, he will finally cross into harassment territory. But Julie would have you believe these are credible threats, and they most certainly are not.

That tweet should also read:



Because you know what? Yeah, she's asking to get yelled at by idiots. Call it victim blaming, but when the victim has an undeniable role in their own victimization, and actively seeks it out, they should hear about it. Because, really, why the fuck are you talking about the Kobe rape case on the day of his last game in the NBA? What in the world could be the purpose in that, other than making a story (Kobe retiring) entirely about you? Because it's not that she wants to remind people of the rape case, it's that she wants to be seen reminding everyone of the Kobe rape case.

I disagree. This "threaten" term gets thrown around way too much by professional victims. If I say "Badrogue, I'm going to shoot you!" That "threat" has so little credibility that it's really, really hard to even call it a "threat". Some guy saying he's going to re-rape Julie is abhorrent and a childish way to deal with a weird fascination with defending Kobe Bryant, but it's not a "threat" in any reasonable interpretation of the term.

Are you honestly saying those tweets are not considered harassment?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Ironically she was in her definition of the word "harassing" someone earlier in the day. The guy with the misspellings in his tweets about the Fox news/ Sean Payton gun stuff.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

That guy needs to be banned. We can all criticize Julie for plenty of stuff related to on air performance or the some of the silly stuff she tweets. But that guy went way over the line. To make it worse, he continued it with several tweets and even referenced Chicago.

Let's not allow our dislike of her opinions blind us from people being way out of line.

And to equate what goes around here (where we sorta know one another and get the jokes) to that type of stuff on Twitter is pretty off base.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You

They're certainly vile, but for me to call something harassment, it would have to be something I couldn't escape. I'm sure if Julie were a CSFMB member she would consider your argument style "harassment".

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down to get it!

This is spot on. Same with 20 yr old Peyton Manning stuff during Super Bowl week.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

If IMU had told Julie to die in a fire, well you get the idea.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

I know that there are multiple definitions of harassment but "not being able to escape" is not part of any of them.

The tweet about "next time I'm in Chicago" is clearly harassment.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

She's a lightning rod, no doubt. That doesn't it make it right for someone to Tweet that stuff to her.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You

more of a lightning ball.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest

*Report this post.

_________________

she really is a terrible person.

all women need attention like they need food and water.

unfortunately, the unattractive ones resort to measures such as these to get it because men would ignore them completely otherwise.

_________________
@audioidkid

Well, I'd disagree with that. It's like saying a TV show is "harassing" you. You're free to turn it off any time. As far as the "threats" are concerned, I'd have to say none that I've seen rises to a level that I'd call credible.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down to get it!

Here's Webster on "harassment"



Certainly not #1, as the tweets numbered 4 and were sent within moments of each other. Maybe #2, maybe? What was the "unpleasant or hostile situation" created by Julie seeing vile things on her phone? Unpleasant, sure, but is it a "situation" if you can just put your phone down and the "harassment" is abated, or block the guy and never see him tweet something at you again? Uninvited? Hardly, she created a public account, and has numerous times refused to protect her tweets, twitter's most viable way of dealing with trolls.

There's absolutely zero credibility to anything even remotely threatening said by that asshole, so any feeling of hostility or fear is unreasonable and irrational.

Didn't scorehead get run from the board because of credible threats? Shit, Julie's a braver man than scorehead!

_________________

Seriously, Julie, try "blacksplaining" or "jewsplain" on for size, see if they sound any less indignant and marginalizing: