| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| new ESPN vs WSCR ratings https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=17823 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | nostradamus [ Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | new ESPN vs WSCR ratings |
Random Ratings - #1 - WGN - 5.5 #2 - WGCI - 5.0 #5 - WOJO - 4.2 #11 - WPPN - 3.0 #12 - WLEY - 2.9 #23 - WMVP - 1.7 #26 - WSCR - 1.5* #27 - WVIV - 1.5* - (*another service has WVIV before WSCR) |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
what about the ratings for the individual shows ? |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: new ESPN vs WSCR ratings |
[quote][quote="nostradamus"]Random Ratings - #1 - WGN - 5.5 #2 - WGCI - 5.0 #5 - WOJO - 4.2 #11 - WPPN - 3.0 #12 - WLEY - 2.9 #23 - WMVP - 1.7 #26 - WSCR - 1.5* #27 - WVIV - 1.5* - (*another service has WVIV before WSCR)[/quote) Phew!!! I'm glad Mitch let you post that memo. |
|
| Author: | Beef Rockmore [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Previous ratings are in brackets after this ratings period: 23. WMVP-AM (1000) ..............................................1.7 [1.3] 26. WSCR-AM (670) ................................................1.5 [1.6] |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What the fuck is WVIV? |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Spanish FM. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The gospel station beat out the score. |
|
| Author: | Beebo [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Score is doomed wrote: The gospel station beat out the score.
Again... I question why the 670 frequency is being used for sportstalk Maybe there's nothing better, but I wonder if a "best of 70s" station could out-draw? That's just ridiculous... |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm not in the know, but havent they essentially said the original way radio ratings were calculated was flawed, then they moved to a new format that is essentially more flawed? |
|
| Author: | trickybeck [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Beebo wrote: Score is doomed wrote: The gospel station beat out the score. Again... I question why the 670 frequency is being used for sportstalk Maybe there's nothing better, but I wonder if a "best of 70s" station could out-draw? That's just ridiculous... The line is that sports talk draws a very specific demographic, something that is more attractive to many sponsors than a station that has a scattered listenership. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|