Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

Was out of the country for a couple of weeks, come back, turn on the Score, and the first thing I hear is Hampton interviewing Pete Carroll: "Y-y-y-ya know, C-c-c-coach, I-I-I- . . ."

Click.

Did I just tune in at a bad time? Has this show become any more listenable lately or is it still the train wreck predicted by many here?

I imagine you would be more accepting of someone losing their mental faculties as they age.

please Reason, don't let this show pound your listening habits into submission! Fight against the good night! This show is mind numbingly bad...it's so bad it would be better with Larry solo...

no, they're fourth best, imo...

The pulse aside, the portion that I heard this morning (about 30 minutes) was better than those first few days. Please realize this is a relative scale.

Hampton's stutter was less pronounced. However, Danimal seemed confused on the chronology of events in yesterday's Cub game.

Far be it from me to make fun of Dan's speech problem. He eventually gets it out.
I tend look past ex-footballer's mental lapses. Their brains have been sloshed around just a bit.
So far, I like the show.

Waddle and Silvy. 9-12 ESPNRadio 1000

Author:	Pappy's Crappy [ Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:37 pm ]
Post subject:	Any Better?
Was out of the country for a couple of weeks, come back, turn on the Score, and the first thing I hear is Hampton interviewing Pete Carroll: "Y-y-y-ya know, C-c-c-coach, I-I-I- . . ." Click. Did I just tune in at a bad time? Has this show become any more listenable lately or is it still the train wreck predicted by many here?

Author:	Beebo [ Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Pappy's Crappy wrote: Was out of the country for a couple of weeks, come back, turn on the Score, and the first thing I hear is Hampton interviewing Pete Carroll: "Y-y-y-ya know, C-c-c-coach, I-I-I- . . ." Click. Did I just tune in at a bad time? Has this show become any more listenable lately or is it still the train wreck predicted by many here? Wreckage of trains, daily

Author:	Mr. Reason [ Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
I may be in the minority, but I kinda like the show.

Author:	Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:29 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
The pulse aside, the portion that I heard this morning (about 30 minutes) was better than those first few days. Please realize this is a relative scale. Hampton's stutter was less pronounced. However, Danimal seemed confused on the chronology of events in yesterday's Cub game.

Author:	Mr. Reason [ Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Far be it from me to make fun of Dan's speech problem. He eventually gets it out. I tend look past ex-footballer's mental lapses. Their brains have been sloshed around just a bit. So far, I like the show.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Any Better? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=24719	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Mr. Reason [ Fri Sep 19, 2008 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I imagine you would be more accepting of someone losing their mental faculties as they age. Quite....

Author:	Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
I liked that a caller mentioned earlier that it was a pleasure talking to Larry's brain.

Author:	City of Fools [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
please Reason, don't let this show pound your listening habits into submission! Fight against the good night! This show is mind numbingly bad...it's so bad it would be better with Larry solo...

Author:	Beebo [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:11 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
City of Fools wrote: please Reason, don't let this show pound your listening habits into submission! Fight against the good night! This show is mind numbingly bad...it's so bad it would be better with Larry solo... hmmm... "LoHo solo better than" is a sentence I can't countenance. I'm not saying its wrong, just that I can't deal with the sentence... Listening to today's barf-fest, I wonder if anyone goes to this lunch remote. I hear no background noise. I mean, hell, I'd rather have Buffone and OB flailing about in their frustrations as the lunch's entertainment, than this junkage.

Author:	WestmontMike [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
This show is the 3rd best show on the Score. But so was Mike North's. So ...any better? Um, no.

Author:	City of Fools [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
no, they're fourth best, imo...

Author:	WestmontMike [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
City of Fools wrote: no, they're fourth best, imo... I would argue with that but I don't think either us truly gives a shit

Author:	Baby McNown [ Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Pappy's Crappy wrote: Any Better? [Jerry Angelo] No [/Jerry]

Author:	BabyIzzo [ Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:04 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: The pulse aside, the portion that I heard this morning (about 30 minutes) was better than those first few days. Please realize this is a relative scale. Hampton's stutter was less pronounced. However, Danimal seemed confused on the chronology of events in yesterday's Cub game. I listened for a bit this morning and they did sound better. Although thet really couldn't have gotton worse. This the 1st time I heard LoHo counter Hampton instead of licking his ass. Hampton was giving the typical meatball tirade (similar to Buffone and OB) about how the Bears defense lack the passion of say the Eagles or Steelers since all the contract extensions. Holmes countered that maybe they are just old and not that good anymore. Which is probably a little more acurate assumption.

Author:	City of Fools [ Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
well...as long as the Score takes him off my radio after football season...sure it's not his fault he doesn't know baseball from a hole in the wall (and his basketball knowedge will likely be priceless) but it is the Score for making him a permanent fixture on a show that was already awful.

Author:	C_Howitt_Fealz [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:42 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Silvy & Carmen need to be put back together late mornings...Waddle and Hood from 12 - 2.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	onthesideline [ Tue Sep 23, 2008 9:12 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Mr. Reason wrote: Far be it from me to make fun of Dan's speech problem. He eventually gets it out. I tend look past ex-footballer's mental lapses. Their brains have been sloshed around just a bit. So far, I like the show. I'm liking the show more too ... seems like Hamp is getting a bit fired up with this years Bear players . I wouldn't expect someone such as the Danimal to be too interested in baseball, after all he's a "football" hall of famer not Ron Santo.

Author:	Baby McNown [ Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:30 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Waddle and Silvy. 9-12 ESPNRadio 1000

Author:	onthesideline [ Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Any Better?
Baby McNown wrote: Waddle and Silvy. 9-12 ESPNRadio 1000 Silvey is nauseating! Waddle is fine. Guess there's something to love and hate with all these dudes!