Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - Am I reading this correctly?

And Mitch Rosen didn't have a spot for J. Hood because??

Jessie Rogers from noon until four.

it's been a slow realization but the old saying "it's not who you know it's who you blow" is starting to look like the new score motto under rosen. the new stars at the score are the ones who kiss mitch beneath his belt buckle mistletoe; whereas hood didn't kiss ass AND especially white ass AND especially underdeserving white ass AND maybe not too crazy about the kaballah keister either - so he and mitch were like oil & water.

Read the words on the page please.

Hood was anti-white / don't know about the anti-semite thing that was a supposition above / so it's being ALLEGED and not SAID / Read the words on the page please.

Author:	Contempt [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:	Am I reading this correctly?
The Score line-up for Saturday. Olken and Baum from 6a - 8a, then again from 9a - 12p. From 8a - 9a is the Handicap show. Huh? Why not schedule the Handicap show for 6a and allow Baum and Olken 7a - 12p? Jessie Rogers from noon until four. Then 4p - 8p: Lou and Bagboy. Who the hell is Bagboy? And Mitch Rosen didn't have a spot for J. Hood because??

Author:	jay hoods pink slip [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:
it's been a slow realization but the old saying "it's not who you know it's who you blow" is starting to look like the new score motto under rosen. the new stars at the score are the ones who kiss mitch beneath his belt buckle mistletoe; whereas hood didn't kiss ass AND especially white ass AND especially underdeserving white ass AND maybe not too crazy about the kaballah keister either - so he and mitch were like oil & water.

Author:	President Haywood [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:
Quote: And Mitch Rosen didn't have a spot for J. Hood because?? because he thinks this is quality programming: Quote: Jessie Rogers from noon until four. I'd love to see the ratings when Jesse is on the air. My guess is it's too low to measure, since 1.0 equals 10,000 or 100,000 people, whatever the conversion is...

Author:	Ed Asner [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 2:21 pm ]
Post subject:
Oh, finally someone puts it all into perspective. Kaballah keister, I asssume, is a reference to Rosen? Because the Kaballah is about the old Testament? Rosen is Jewish and Jews are all about the old Testament? I think I'm just confusing myself at this point, but was part of the problem that Hood was anti-semitic? Or that he was also anti-white? Or did he just not like the asses of either religion/race? How about this . . . he sucked and that is why he isn't on the Score? Moron . . . jay hoods pink slip wrote: it's been a slow realization but the old saying "it's not who you know it's who you blow" is starting to look like the new score motto under rosen. the new stars at the score are the ones who kiss mitch beneath his belt buckle mistletoe; whereas hood didn't kiss ass AND especially white ass AND especially underdeserving white ass AND maybe not too crazy about the kaballah keister either - so he and mitch were like oil & water.

Author:	doug - evergreen park [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 3:48 pm ]
Post subject:
so......why is he on WMVP then? b/c Tom Shaer was worse than Hood?

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Am I reading this correctly? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=2679	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Hood on my cack [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:
Hood was anti-white / don't know about the anti-semite thing that was a supposition above / so it's being ALLEGED and not SAID / Read the words on the page please.

Author:	Score is doomed [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 5:30 pm ]
Post subject:
jay hoods pink slip wrote: it's been a slow realization but the old saying "it's not who you know it's who you blow" is starting to look like the new score motto under rosen. the new stars at the score are the ones who kiss mitch beneath his belt buckle mistletoe; whereas hood didn't kiss ass AND especially white ass AND especially underdeserving white ass AND maybe not too crazy about the kaballah keister either - so he and mitch were like oil & water. What new stars? These guys are all part time fillers. They must pay to be on the air.

Author:	Column A & Column B [ Fri Nov 11, 2005 6:44 pm ]
Post subject:
I think some of your are asking and answering different statements. This thread is kind of hard to follow and rambling. Just like The Mike North Morning Show! I had to get that in.

Author:	Guest [ Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:48 am ]
Post subject:
Hood on my cack wrote: Hood was anti-white / don't know about the anti-semite thing that was a supposition above / so it's being ALLEGED and not SAID / Read the words on the page please. what? hood anti-white? that makes no sense... I don't see it... this thread really is hard to follow! Do posters just pull their comments out of thin air:?:

Author:	just the facts please [ Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:08 pm ]
Post subject:
was he anti-white or just anti-telander? it was a little of both. hood would do his dog & pony show and get the 'happy brother' ebonics goings with black guests or hosts or callers, but he was a different animal when whitey was on with him. not an opinion - just fact.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/