Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

What are you talking about Lawrence?

- "Vinny needs to get a technical early in the next game to establish the fact that he is angry." What kind of immature idea would that be? In a series that has been extremely close, the Bulls need every point they can get.

- "The Bulls should have won by 20 points." That is a stretch. The series has been tight, and this team isn't blowing out the defending champs on their home court by 20 even without Garnett.

- "The final play was a great call by Vinny." It was a blown play in which Kirk passed it to a wide-open Miller. It was not the designed play because Kirk looked at two other options before Miller. Giving the ball to Miller for a last second shot is never a well-designed play unless someone else first had the ball and passed it to a wide-open Miller. The ball should never go to him immediately.

- "Rose should have had the ball on the last play in regulation." Whatever you think of Gordon and his deficiencies, he has proven that he can close out games. He was the Bulls best option and he just missed it.

- "Miller should have known that he should have hit the rim on the last free-throw." I am sure Miller knew this, he just missed the backboard. I doubt he practices that shot.

Author:	Wilson A2000 [ Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:38 am ]
Post subject:	4/29 Show
What are you talking about Lawrence? - "Vinny needs to get a technical early in the next game to establish the fact that he is angry." What kind of immature idea would that be? In a series that has been extremely close, the Bulls need every point they can get. - "The Bulls should have won by 20 points." That is a stretch. The series has been tight, and this team isn't blowing out the defending champs on their home court by 20 even without Garnett. - "The final play was a great call by Vinny." It was a blown play in which Kirk passed it to a wide-open Miller. It was not the designed play because Kirk looked at two other options before Miller. Giving the ball to Miller for a last second shot is never a well-designed play unless someone else first had the ball and passed it to a wide-open Miller. The ball should never go to him immediately. - "Rose should have had the ball on the last play in regulation." Whatever you think of Gordon and his deficiencies, he has proven that he can close out games. He was the Bulls best option and he just missed it. - "Miller should have known that he should have hit the rim on the last free-throw." I am sure Miller knew this, he just missed the backboard. I doubt he practices that shot.

Author:	Bud Dude [ Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/29 Show
When LH was a fill-in his sports ignorance wasn't as noticeable. Now that he has a full-time gig it is very clear he is very very clueless when it comes to our local sports teams. When I decide to listen now I do so when I need a good laugh. There is always something that one of these 2 goofs says that is pretty stupid thus very funny to me. After game 4 LH said that Brad Miller was absolutely brutal and brought the Bulls down. I thought Brad Miller had an excellent game 4. This was confirmed on Murph's show yesterday when John Dewan stated that Brad Miller was the Bulls +/- leader at +21 for game 4. What the Score sees in LH is a mystery to me.

Author:	Johnny Chimpo [ Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:59 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/29 Show
I cannot agree with him that Miller asking for a towel to stop the blood from a wound that eventually was sutured is being a big baby or a girl.

Author:	SHARK [ Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:08 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/29 Show
That's the "Magic Johnson Rule" when play is stopped for the player to stop bleeding...It's been that way in the NBA since Johnson was diagnosed w/the HIV virus!

Author:	Wilson A2000 [ Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/29 Show
Johnny Chimpo wrote: I cannot agree with him that Miller asking for a towel to stop the blood from a wound that eventually was sutured is being a big baby or a girl. I don't remember him saying that (he still could have), but Lawrence seemed to say that Miller wincing at the line was partly responsible for his missing the first free-throw. Holmes said that he should have been focusing on the shot, not his mouth.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

4/29 Show https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=32104	Page 1 of 1

Author:	BD [ Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:37 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 4/29 Show
Wilson A2000 wrote: What are you talking about Lawrence? - "Vinny needs to get a technical early in the next game to establish the fact that he is angry." What kind of immature idea would that be? In a series that has been extremely close, the Bulls need every point they can get. - "The Bulls should have won by 20 points." That is a stretch. The series has been tight, and this team isn't blowing out the defending champs on their home court by 20 even without Garnett. - "The final play was a great call by Vinny." It was a blown play in which Kirk passed it to a wide-open Miller. It was not the designed play because Kirk looked at two other options before Miller. Giving the ball to Miller for a last second shot is never a well-designed play unless someone else first had the ball and passed it to a wide-open Miller. The ball should never go to him immediately. - "Rose should have had the ball on the last play in regulation." Whatever you think of Gordon and his deficiencies, he has proven that he can close out games. He was the Bulls best option and he just missed it. - "Miller should have known that he should have hit the rim on the last free-throw." I am sure Miller knew this, he just missed the backboard. I doubt he practices that shot. To sum this up, he's a moron.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/