Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=32433
Page 1 of 1

Author:  suckers playground [ Mon May 11, 2009 4:51 pm ]
Post subject:  670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Referenced here (viewtopic.php?f=75&t=32414), let's see who's listening. Easy enough instructions: post "shitcan" or "retain," in bold, accompanied by the emoticon of your choosing and feel free to elaborate on the rationale for your vote.

Author:  lipidquadcab [ Mon May 11, 2009 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

retain... :|

I'm at work, where I can't listen, so I really don't care...

Author:  suckers playground [ Mon May 11, 2009 4:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Shitcan :idea:

Decent enough show during football season but even then I found the hosts, Laurence Holmes and Dan Hampton, to be hard on the ears. Hampton can't form a single coherent thought and Holmes complicates the obvious and magnifies the mundane in a manner that makes for poor radio. I've given them their due chance, but I just cannot listen to this show, and I suspect that several other CSFMB users feel the same way. Shake it up and bring these guys back during football season if you must give them airtime.

Author:  lipidquadcab [ Mon May 11, 2009 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

For some reason I thought this was about M&H, not H&H...oops...

Author:  suckers playground [ Mon May 11, 2009 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

I think H&H is the biggest problem currently at 670. They've got to be losing a bulk of listeners to the infinitely more tolerable / entertaining Waddle & Silvy show at AM 1000.

Author:  Scorehead [ Sat May 16, 2009 12:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

suckers playground wrote:
I think H&H is the biggest problem currently at 670. They've got to be losing a bulk of listeners to the infinitely more tolerable / entertaining Waddle & Silvy show at AM 1000.


Shitcan. I still cant figure out how anybody could listen to Hamp and think that he is good. WGN made the right move...Mitch Rosen made a horribly bad move.
I think Lawrence would be good with the right partner...not sure who though.

Author:  roscoe1972 [ Sat May 16, 2009 7:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Shitcan :x

Nice guys...bad radio. I used to think Laurence was OK as a fill in but he really gets on my nerves as a host. He is trying too hard and it just sounds forced or unnatural. The two don't mesh at all.

I see Rosen with a Draft-type board sliding names around and pairing them up with no regard to chemistry. "Lets see, this guy needs a slot and we need an ex-jock to give us credibility. I'll just slap these two together."

Author:  Beebo [ Sat May 16, 2009 11:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

shitcan :thumbdown:

Waste of radio space. No use for Lawrence in any capacity; Hamp belongs on a postgame. A spot he was recently relieved from.

Author:  crosscheck [ Sat May 16, 2009 12:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

That time slot is rendered useless as long as M&H are in the mornings. H&H are at a disadvantage being that they start an hour after waddle and silvy, not to mention they are at another disadvantage being that they are just not that talented. But that time slot would have a great chance if there were a really popular local morning show going till ten, so that people might forget about the first hour of w&s, then even if you have above average talent in the 10-12 time slot you'll automatically pick up a lot more listeners. But it would take quite the talent to beat mike and mike, even though I can't stand it, I understand that it is very popular.

Oh yeah: Shitcan

Author:  Juiced [ Sat May 16, 2009 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

ahhh ummm ehhh ahhh sh umm ahh ehhh shitcan

When Hampton isn't talking in circles, he is struggling to get a sentence out. HORRIBLE RADIO HOST!!!!

Author:  Count Floyd [ Sat May 16, 2009 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

SHITCAN :puker: :pukel:

Author:  Scorehead [ Sat May 16, 2009 11:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

roscoe1972 wrote:
Shitcan :x

Nice guys...bad radio. I used to think Laurence was OK as a fill in but he really gets on my nerves as a host. He is trying too hard and it just sounds forced or unnatural. The two don't mesh at all.

I see Rosen with a Draft-type board sliding names around and pairing them up with no regard to chemistry. "Lets see, this guy needs a slot and we need an ex-jock to give us credibility. I'll just slap these two together."


In order to predict the future, one must look at the past...and when you look at some of the show pairings that Rosen has out together, it makes you wonder just how in the hell this guy has been a Program Director for 10 years. What a judge of talent, huh! Lets just hope that there is someone else with a clue who has some influence in this important decision...but I dont think there is.

John

Author:  spanky [ Sat May 16, 2009 11:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

John,
No need to waste our time or yours by putting your name at the end of every post. In fact, just look to the left of every one of your posts! There it is! It's the same name your typing at the bottom of all of your posts!

John

Author:  Scorehead [ Sat May 16, 2009 11:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

spanky wrote:
John,
No need to waste our time or yours by putting your name at the end of every post. In fact, just look to the left of every one of your posts! There it is! It's the same name your typing at the bottom of all of your posts!

John


It's just force of habit. Some of you guys are particular about how others post. Who really gives a shit anyway?

Author:  doug - evergreen park [ Sun May 17, 2009 9:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

I wish I could sit on a lazy boy with a mic and an isdn line and "work" (used very loosely) from home, making 4 times as much in 2 hours that our 2009 college grads will be seeing over the course of a year.....IF they can find a job, which they won't be able to.

Author:  C_Howitt_Fealz [ Sun May 17, 2009 10:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

crosscheck wrote:
H&H are at a disadvantage being that they start an hour after waddle and silvy, not to mention they are at another disadvantage being that they are just not that talented.


They're at a disadvantage because Holmes is a pretentious cocksucker who dreams of stabbing white people, who says shit just for the sake of saying it. I generally can feel my brain cells dying while listening to Urkel.

Hampton's the radio version of Muhammed Ali. He sounds like he's taken 50 more blows to the head than he should have taken.

Author:  Sasha Fierce [ Mon May 18, 2009 10:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

JohnKirk wrote:
spanky wrote:
John,
No need to waste our time or yours by putting your name at the end of every post. In fact, just look to the left of every one of your posts! There it is! It's the same name your typing at the bottom of all of your posts!
John

It's just force of habit. Some of you guys are particular about how others post. Who really gives a shit anyway?

O John, your small number of posts in the double digits tells me you're still a young pup so let me state the obvious via Yogi Berra: yes, half the posts here come from morons, half the posts come from half-morons, and half the posts come from sane people like you & me. Beware of guys of questionable sexual orientation posting from moms basement in skid-marked underwear - in other words - The Majority.

Author:  jimmypasta [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Sasha Fierce wrote:
JohnKirk wrote:
spanky wrote:
John,
No need to waste our time or yours by putting your name at the end of every post. In fact, just look to the left of every one of your posts! There it is! It's the same name your typing at the bottom of all of your posts!
John

It's just force of habit. Some of you guys are particular about how others post. Who really gives a shit anyway?

O John, your small number of posts in the double digits tells me you're still a young pup so let me state the obvious via Yogi Berra: yes, half the posts here come from morons, half the posts come from half-morons, and half the posts come from sane people like you & me. Beware of guys of questionable sexual orientation posting from moms basement in skid-marked underwear - in other words - The Majority.


Hey,watch it...I got half a mind to...to...to....ehhh...Wha??

Author:  RodeoVann [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Quote:
and when you look at some of the show pairings that Rosen has out together


Name some. Which ones didnt you like?

Van :lol:

Author:  spmack [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Sasha Fierce wrote:
O John, your small number of posts in the double digits tells me you're still a young pup so let me state the obvious via Yogi Berra: yes, half the posts here come from morons, half the posts come from half-morons, and half the posts come from sane people like you & me. Beware of guys of questionable sexual orientation posting from moms basement in skid-marked underwear - in other words - The Majority.


And also John, half the posts come from a former producer who does nothing but hate on Holmes and Hood.

Author:  Scorehead [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

johnkirk wrote:
Quote:
and when you look at some of the show pairings that Rosen has out together


[quote=Rodeovann]Name some. Which ones didnt you like?

North and Ann Maxfield
Mully & Hanley
Hamp & Holmes
Boers & Bernsey the last 2 years
Zach Zaidman & anyone else
Dropping Fox Sports Radio in favor of Sporting News Radio
Dropping Doug & OB

Author:  Scorehead [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

spmack wrote:
Sasha Fierce wrote:
O John, your small number of posts in the double digits tells me you're still a young pup so let me state the obvious via Yogi Berra: yes, half the posts here come from morons, half the posts come from half-morons, and half the posts come from sane people like you & me. Beware of guys of questionable sexual orientation posting from moms basement in skid-marked underwear - in other words - The Majority.


And also John, half the posts come from a former producer who does nothing but hate on Holmes and Hood.


Really...who? Everyone rags on Holmes...but I am a big fan of J Hood.

Author:  RodeoVann [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Quote:
North and Ann Maxfield

Bad news on that one, Anne was pappys call, mitch tried to fire her and pappy said no, he had total control, so she stayed.

Quote:
Mully & Hanley

The next book after north left, they beat mike and mike, so its a winner in mitchs favor.

Quote:
Hamp & Holmes

agreed
Quote:
Boers & Bernsey the last 2 years

They were a team b4 he got there, still the best show on the score. Cant blame mitch since they were a team when he got there, not his call.

Quote:
Zach Zaidman & anyone else

Zach is non-factor, who cares?

Quote:
Dropping Fox Sports Radio in favor of Sporting News Radio

That was a cbsradio move, not mitch.

Quote:
Dropping Doug & OB

It was time, yelling and screaming gets old after 10 years.

Author:  Scorehead [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

RodeoVann wrote:
Quote:
North and Ann Maxfield

Bad news on that one, Anne was pappys call, mitch tried to fire her and pappy said no, he had total control, so she stayed.

-Thats Mitch's fault, not Mikes...

Quote:
Mully & Hanley

The next book after north left, they beat mike and mike, so its a winner in mitchs favor.

-One win doesn't - success. The show stinks and they have been getting their ass kicked my Mike & Mike for a long time...

Quote:
Hamp & Holmes

agreed

Quote:
Boers & Bernsey the last 2 years

They were a team b4 he got there, still the best show on the score. Cant blame mitch since they were a team when he got there, not his call.

-You can only blame your predicesspr for so long. B&B was a great show that was allowed to turn into the shitfest that is now is. The Program Directors responsibility is the quality of the programs.

Quote:
Zach Zaidman & anyone else

Zach is non-factor, who cares?

-Zach is a non factor? Have youu noticed how much airtime this goof is now getting??? It seems like every time I turn on the Score Zach is on!

Quote:
Dropping Fox Sports Radio in favor of Sporting News Radio

That was a cbsradio move, not mitch.

- Do you know this to be fact? Either way, bad move.

Quote:
Dropping Doug & OB

It was time, yelling and screaming gets old after 10 years.


-Tell me this in 4 Months after listening to Zach & Hamp on the Bears post game show. Yuk...
Doug & OB was the most intersting & fun show on the Score.

Last but certainly not least, WSCR's ratings have taken a severe nosedive, getting clobbered by ESPN 1000 since the current Score regime took over. The same thing happened at AM1000 when MR was in charge there...
With his track record, how does MR survive a performance appraisal???
I fire guys with this kind of track record!

Author:  Scorehead [ Mon May 18, 2009 11:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Now I gotta figure out how to respond to multiple quotes in the same post!

Author:  Kishin Shinoyama [ Tue May 19, 2009 12:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

spmack wrote:
Sasha Fierce wrote:
O John, your small number of posts in the double digits tells me you're still a young pup so let me state the obvious via Yogi Berra: yes, half the posts here come from morons, half the posts come from half-morons, and half the posts come from sane people like you & me. Beware of guys of questionable sexual orientation posting from moms basement in skid-marked underwear - in other words - The Majority.

And also John, half the posts come from a former producer who does nothing but hate on Holmes and Hood.

? Bad is bad no matter how you slice it: Holmes, Hood, Zaidman, Murf, etc.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Thu May 21, 2009 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

doug - evergreen park wrote:
I wish I could sit on a lazy boy with a mic and an isdn line and "work" (used very loosely) from home

Hampton ISDNs his show? That's like the opposite of letting the bear out of his cage!

Author:  onthesideline [ Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 670 Listener Focus Group re: H&H

Sasha Fierce wrote:
JohnKirk wrote:
spanky wrote:
John,
No need to waste our time or yours by putting your name at the end of every post. In fact, just look to the left of every one of your posts! There it is! It's the same name your typing at the bottom of all of your posts!
John

It's just force of habit. Some of you guys are particular about how others post. Who really gives a shit anyway?

O John, your small number of posts in the double digits tells me you're still a young pup so let me state the obvious via Yogi Berra: yes, half the posts here come from morons, half the posts come from half-morons, and half the posts come from sane people like you & me. Beware of guys of questionable sexual orientation posting from moms basement in skid-marked underwear - in other words - The Majority.



OMG you are too funny .... and sooo right!

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/