i copied it..
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| To Matt Weber https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=33894 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | To Matt Weber |
Just a quick question for you- Why did you take down your well written, well though out blog entry? Did you get pressured to do so? I thought it was from the heart and well done, now it is gone. However, I printed it out and can publish it on here again if you wish or fail to explain why it is gone. Thanks. |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
Score is doomed wrote: Just a quick question for you- Why did you take down your well written, well though out blog entry? Did you get pressured to do so? I thought it was from the heart and well done, now it is gone. However, I printed it out and can publish it on here again if you wish or fail to explain why it is gone. Thanks. You're threatening Matt Weber to explain why he removed his blog about Webio??? Wow... |
|
| Author: | Jalapenos and More [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
It's not SID's fault if Weber didn't think through the ramifications of posting something for all the world to see, JohnKirk. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
JohnKirk wrote: Score is doomed wrote: Just a quick question for you- Why did you take down your well written, well though out blog entry? Did you get pressured to do so? I thought it was from the heart and well done, now it is gone. However, I printed it out and can publish it on here again if you wish or fail to explain why it is gone. Thanks. You're threatening Matt Weber to explain why he removed his blog about Webio??? Wow... What I want to know is--Who asked him to take down his blog? Was it the government? Was it North or one of his associates? Did someone pay him to remove it? There were some very interesting things in the blog, at least to me. It was very well written. It was honest and should be read as a warning to anyone getting into a new venture. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
JohnKirk wrote: Score is doomed wrote: Just a quick question for you- Why did you take down your well written, well though out blog entry? Did you get pressured to do so? I thought it was from the heart and well done, now it is gone. However, I printed it out and can publish it on here again if you wish or fail to explain why it is gone. Thanks. You're threatening Matt Weber to explain why he removed his blog about Webio??? Wow... there is no threat here. Kirk, you truly are a moron. |
|
| Author: | Wanderer [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
Simply reading the line Quote: printed it out and can publish it on here again if you wish or fail to explain why it is gone. might lead a reasonable reader to conclude that unless Webby doesn't explain why the blog was deleted, you would post it here. And a reasonable reader would construe that as a threat. |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
He took it down for a reason...I don't think he has to tell anyone why...to post it here would be pretty shitty, imo... |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
just post that shit, this isnt a nationally known forum or anything. who gives a fuck... its just webby anyway he wont care. he probably wanted to leave it up but was asked to pull it... i bet he would want us to repost it. |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
The red brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. |
|
| Author: | Wanderer [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
Can't believe that you would do that to someone who already lost his job. |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
I didn't do that to spite Matt. In fact, it will come down now. Hope you copied it if you wanted it. |
|
| Author: | Wanderer [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
As David Stein would say on his show (which won't be heard anymore on WSCR), removing his entry was a 'random act of kindness'. |
|
| Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
i copied it..
|
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote: I didn't do that to spite Matt. In fact, it will come down now. Hope you copied it if you wanted it. Stay classy... |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
I don't want to shit on anyone's parade here, but the cached copy is still available from Google. http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:kTA ... clnk&gl=us |
|
| Author: | shakes [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote: I don't want to shit on anyone's parade here, but the cached copy is still available from Google. http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:kTA ... clnk&gl=us Thanks for the link, I hadn't read that before. Webby seems like a very nice guy, but its hard to feel sorry for someone who thought he was worth a 3x raise in the middle of a depression. How stupid can you be? |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
heh google strikes again |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
pretty honest blog, but this- "I had absolutely NO intention of leaving The Score, but I wanted to at least show him respect and hear him out. " he's full of shit. webby praises mike left and right for never doing him wrong, but in retrospect he was skeptical about mike's invitation just to TALK? (no details at all at this point, he just wanted to talk with webby and of course webby wanted to) overall i think this blog makes webby look like a pussy bitch. so he was right in taking it down... |
|
| Author: | Spiral Stairs [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
he took it down because he said mike and bebe owned 30%, my guess is nort saw this and told him to take it down or he could face legal problems. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
Deacon Blues wrote: he took it down because he said mike and bebe owned 30%, my guess is nort saw this and told him to take it down or he could face legal problems. BTW, that was the FIRST time anyone said North owned any of it. Before that, North denied he owned any and was just an employee! |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
what difference does it make? norths probably invested 25k into hernandez, but hernandez ran everything from there financially- just like the mexican did with everyone else he scammed |
|
| Author: | Jalapenos and More [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
If North indeed owned 30%, it will be found out. Weber won't be in any trouble because of the revelation, except that he might get excommunicated by North, which won't be a bad thing. |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
To quote Weber's blog entry: "We were all led to believe that David Hernandez (CEO of NextStep Medical, among other ventures) owned 70% of Webio, and that Mike and BeBe North owned 30%." |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
Score is doomed wrote: JohnKirk wrote: Score is doomed wrote: Just a quick question for you- Why did you take down your well written, well though out blog entry? Did you get pressured to do so? I thought it was from the heart and well done, now it is gone. However, I printed it out and can publish it on here again if you wish or fail to explain why it is gone. Thanks. You're threatening Matt Weber to explain why he removed his blog about Webio??? Wow... there is no threat here. Kirk, you truly are a moron. SID...In you post, you told Webber that if he didnt explain to you why he removed his blog about Webio, that you would re-post it because you had saved a copy. |
|
| Author: | Count Floyd [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
it's on Google - it's on other message boards - PM me if you need it. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
Count Floyd wrote: it's on Google - it's on other message boards - PM me if you need it. I'd rather just email you at Jerry.Riles@CLTV.COM; or here http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-kessler/0/448/597 |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 02, 2013 3:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
so.....does anyone still have a cached copy? |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Tue Jul 02, 2013 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
I remember the jist of it. It was basically a sad country song. He said he was making shit at the Score. Felt good that somebody offered him big money. He felt like he was finally a big deal. I think Hernandez salaried him at 100k or something close to that. (I would have known before the salary offer, but right there is when he certainly should have known it was a scam. Nobody gives a no name kid a 100k salary to do a radio show, let alone a start up webio show.) Anyway, he said his stomach dropped when the 2nd check didn't clear. He felt like a dumb ass. Had to move in with his girlfriend. |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: To Matt Weber |
did matt weber go to hononegah |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|