Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
pappy nugget https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=34797 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | pappy nugget |
Nice little nugget from my buddy at comcast today. Comcast wanted to have subs for pappy and jigs while they were on vaca, but pappy would have had to pay the fill in guys per his deal with comcast, so he said no. Way to take care of your guys pappy, class guy all the way. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
This is the guy that would bitch about the Score going on the cheap. Funny how things change when it's your money. Didn't he owe it to his current sponsors to have live programming? They shouldn't have had to pay the same rate for reruns. Plus people couldn't get the traffic!!!!! How do you do reruns on a TV sports show? Especially when the Cubs and Sox played every day. That's pathetic. |
Author: | RFDC [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Maybe they can do a best of. . . Nevermind. |
Author: | Score is doomed [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
RodeoVann wrote: Nice little nugget from my buddy at comcast today. Comcast wanted to have subs for pappy and jigs while they were on vaca, but pappy would have had to pay the fill in guys per his deal with comcast, so he said no. Way to take care of your guys pappy, class guy all the way. Why didn't they tell to f off and run Sportsrise? Better show. |
Author: | illini81887 [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
If they wanted to do a vacation, this would be week to do it |
Author: | Puckhead [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Can we change the subject to pappy buttnugget? |
Author: | My Coach Vinny [ Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
I thought this thread would be about Pappy caught defecating in Rodeo's horse barn. |
Author: | walkrman5 [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
I'm sure he slept well though. |
Author: | Pappy's Crappy [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Funny how he's so money-conscious now, but he and that COO over at Webio didn't seem to have a clue about how they were paying for six-figure salaries, advertising at the Cell, first-class travel to Calgary, etc. on 2,300 fucking dollars of revenue. What an asshole. |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Pappy's Crappy wrote: Funny how he's so money-conscious now, but he and that COO over at Webio didn't seem to have a clue about how they were paying for six-figure salaries, advertising at the Cell, first-class travel to Calgary, etc. on 2,300 fucking dollars of revenue. What an asshole. Amazing. The more I think about it. Only months away from walking from a $650,000 (or whatever) to doing this WEBIO BS. Not only did he not research Hernandez,he did not do a feasability study on the whole concept. I STILL think it's a good idea but not the business model they had set up. Throwing around money left & right was way off base. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Mitch thanks his chosen deity every night that north did not sign that contract offer. That salary in this climate might have cost Mitch his job. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
RodeoVann wrote: pappy nugget Sounds like a chotchkie to me. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Beardown wrote: . Plus people couldn't get the traffic!!!!! I'm still trying to get the traffic report from that day |
Author: | bigfan [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Great North stuff! Maybe just a little tightening of the belt in the North camp??? |
Author: | shakes [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
good dolphin wrote: Mitch thanks his chosen deity every night that north did not sign that contract offer. That salary in this climate might have cost Mitch his job. Hiring Mack didn't cost Mitch his job (yet) so I doubt keeping Nort would've mattered much. Seems like Mitch has carte blanche over there. |
Author: | Jalapenos and More [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Mac is making $200K on a one-year deal. Pappy would've gotten $800K for a multi-year deal. |
Author: | shakes [ Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
Jalapenos and More wrote: Mac is making $200K on a one-year deal. Pappy would've gotten $800K for a multi-year deal. Mac's only getting 200K? How is that possible? Is he doing the show on remote from the comfort of his bed? |
Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: pappy nugget |
shakes wrote: Jalapenos and More wrote: Mac is making $200K on a one-year deal. Pappy would've gotten $800K for a multi-year deal. Mac's only getting 200K? How is that possible? Is he doing the show on remote from the comfort of his bed? Mac wishes he were making $200k. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |