If you meet him in person he will buy you a steak!!!!!!
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Nothing for North? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=34965 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bigfan [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Nothing for North? |
I am surprised that North has nothing in the way of sponsors. Even some of the smaller guys who used to step up. Regardless if you like or hate Mike, the guy does have a TV show and (i think) a salesperson or two? Even he has to be in shock at how little ad time he has garnished. One of his defenders I know, and most of you hate, said that it had something to do with contacting former sponsors of the Score. I then brought up The Little Guys and that discussion ended in a hurry. But his Buddy Rich Melman is mega rich, with tons of the places to advertise and unless I am not aware, they don't have any ads with Mike. Feldco and Great Outdoors are COMCAST clients and I am sure, COMCAST has made sure North does not contact these people. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
If you meet him in person he will buy you a steak!!!!!!
|
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Maybe, just maybe, North has run his course in this town? The engine blew up? People are tired of a dose of "Stupid in the Morning"? The 10 or 12 who tuned in? |
|
| Author: | Frontman [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
I think its just as TeeLander said; would you want to sponsor a show that the main face of might be walking in and out of a courtroom on such a high-profile case? Even if Mike is in the clear, you know damn well he'll either be served to appear as a witness (or knowing Mike's love of the spotlight) will appear anyways to witness the proceedings. No matter what else is said, Hernandez was Mike's business partner in this venture. And given Mike's way of bullshitting everyone about everything; I can see why even 'loyal' sponsors to Mike are steering clear. In other news, JenJen is once again bragging about her shopping trips to Koros on Facebook. She now even has a style consultant! |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
If Hernandez keeps his mouth shut and pleads guilty.....end of story. North and his merry band of dim bulb followers, Chet, Ofman, ,Jesse and all the other dopes who were salami slapping when common sense was being handed out can play the victim role. The real question is whether or not advertisers want to invest their money now in North.... His show should be called THE VILLAGE IDIOT AND FRIENDS. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Frontman wrote: In other news, JenJen is once again bragging about her shopping trips to Koros on Facebook. She now even has a style consultant! I think I mentioned that her name used to pop up as a recommended friend on facebook until I told them to stop recommending her. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
bigfan wrote: I am surprised that North has nothing in the way of sponsors. Even some of the smaller guys who used to step up. Regardless if you like or hate Mike, the guy does have a TV show and (i think) a salesperson or two? Even he has to be in shock at how little ad time he has garnished. One of his defenders I know, and most of you hate, said that it had something to do with contacting former sponsors of the Score. I then brought up The Little Guys and that discussion ended in a hurry. But his Buddy Rich Melman is mega rich, with tons of the places to advertise and unless I am not aware, they don't have any ads with Mike. Feldco and Great Outdoors are COMCAST clients and I am sure, COMCAST has made sure North does not contact these people. With the economy the way it is and ad dollars being so tight, why would anyone risk/waste money advertising on his show? The ratings are in the tank, he's a moron and he "could" be in for some legal trouble- so why would anyone put up money for that? None of his "friends" or former sponsors could put up enough money to replace the Hernandez money, which is now gone and maybe forfeited. Sound business practices would tell anyone to stay away from him. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Bookie Priest wrote: North has a big sponsor lined up. A maker of adult beverages. It's going to be a huge sponsor, remotes, swag, title sponsorship. Just the details remain. Youll see. Miller can't be that stupid. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Bookie Priest wrote: North has a big sponsor lined up. A maker of adult beverages. It's going to be a huge sponsor, remotes, swag, title sponsorship. Just the details remain. Youll see. Let me guess.....Fritzy delivered Miller .......that would be a coup for Mike...... Hope Mike doesn't start big timing Fritzy. Did Fritzy save North's ass, Father? |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Bookie Priest wrote: Score is doomed wrote: Bookie Priest wrote: North has a big sponsor lined up. A maker of adult beverages. It's going to be a huge sponsor, remotes, swag, title sponsorship. Just the details remain. Youll see. Miller can't be that stupid. Even better "mr. Score is Soon to Wish they'd Kept north." A local company. None of this African owned crap. Meister Brau has been gone for years. Goose Island Brewery? Some guy making bathtub gin? |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Bookie Priest wrote: Score is doomed wrote: Bookie Priest wrote: North has a big sponsor lined up. A maker of adult beverages. It's going to be a huge sponsor, remotes, swag, title sponsorship. Just the details remain. Youll see. Miller can't be that stupid. Even better "mr. Score is Soon to Wish they'd Kept north." A local company. None of this African owned crap. hmm. goose island or two brothers wouldn't be stupid enough to sign on with him so who could it be??? |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
BF you should out this mult. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Bookie Priest wrote: Urlacher's missing neck wrote: hmm. goose island or two brothers wouldn't be stupid enough to sign on with him so who could it be??? Stupid enough to or stupid not to? See, you bozos on this website are the same as the viewing audience of the show. I see how you beer snob operate. Ohhh, miller tastes like pee. Ohhh, they must advertise the bottle cause what's inside is junk... You homos only drink that 8-10 dollar a sixpack stuff. And... the local breweries know that when they're on MITM then they're reaching their exact target crowd. 5k viewers of MITM is like advertising to 14k viewers of CSI. It's all about target density. You guys ain't so smart. Dense being the operative word. You are targeting the dense, but beer is not allowed in the County Jails, MCC, or the Department of Mental Health. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
I'm no beer snob...Harry Caray had me drinking Falstaff and Stroh's.
|
|
| Author: | Frontman [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Aggravated Sox Fan Bob wrote: You are targeting the dense, but beer is not allowed in the County Jails, MCC, or the Department of Mental Health.  "MY GUYS!!!!" |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Bookie Priest wrote: Urlacher's missing neck wrote: hmm. goose island or two brothers wouldn't be stupid enough to sign on with him so who could it be??? Stupid enough to or stupid not to? See, you bozos on this website are the same as the viewing audience of the show. I see how you beer snob operate. Ohhh, miller tastes like pee. Ohhh, they must advertise the bottle cause what's inside is junk... You homos only drink that 8-10 dollar a sixpack stuff. And... the local breweries know that when they're on MITM then they're reaching their exact target crowd. 5k viewers of MITM is like advertising to 14k viewers of CSI. It's all about target density. You guys ain't so smart. 1. They are not reaching their target crowd in the morning. The afternoon drive is where you want to sell adult beverages. 5 hour energy, monster( how the hell could they not get them as a sponsor already with the similar name), rockstar all sell in the morning. 2. The people that enjoy these craft brews already know about them. The people that dont like them also know about them. I doubt a few morning adds will boost sales. Now if you are in the afternoon and do a remote from goose island in downtown or head out to the burbs and do one at two brothers then you might sell some beer. 3. I don't see why you assume one can not enjoy a high life followed by an imperial ipa from two brothers. I sure do every now and then. |
|
| Author: | Jalapenos and More [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
I like Miller products. My wife and I have Master's degrees. Are we "beer snob?" It is shocking that before the scandal broke North couldn't deliver any real sponsors. He should've charged minimal ad rates just to cultivate partnerships for better economic times, especially if he believed his sugar daddy had money to burn. BP, simple question: has North made a single mistake career since May 2008? Simple yes or no suffices as a response. No rationalizations needed. And not to sound like Bernstein, but there's only one correct answer. |
|
| Author: | FYI [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
spmack wrote: BF you should out this mult. +1 and I think I know who it is. Bascially the same guy who never agrees with anyone about anything. Now he just makes up shit and fights under another name. |
|
| Author: | Score is doomed [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
I know, it's Mike North's home brew!! "Tastes like shit but made by MY GUYS" |
|
| Author: | RodeoVann [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
bookie mystery beer sponser is schlitz and i doubt it will jappen. its one thing to give pappy a 2000 check for wildfire webio, i dont see them dumping 200,000 to a bad morning show, plus extra to start up webio again...the,details bookie speaks of is to get jeff and pappy to stop begging. |
|
| Author: | Supercup [ Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Srsly, name one company that wants to be associated with somebody who partnered with a felon? Times have changed, ad monies arent there unless its a win/win. Theres no way a major company is going to invest in a show thats realisticly, getting maybe 200 viewers if they are lucky.I can see some small timer buying Nort's bullshit for a little bit of pub, but no way Miller, no fucking way. Why would Miller get involved with this piece of shit if, they could get a major sport pre or post game?Where they are guarenteed viewers? He prolly has a polish bakery or used car lot, if that. "MITM, sponsored by Victory auto wreckers" |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 12:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Score is doomed wrote: bigfan wrote: I am surprised that North has nothing in the way of sponsors. Even some of the smaller guys who used to step up. Regardless if you like or hate Mike, the guy does have a TV show and (i think) a salesperson or two? Even he has to be in shock at how little ad time he has garnished. One of his defenders I know, and most of you hate, said that it had something to do with contacting former sponsors of the Score. I then brought up The Little Guys and that discussion ended in a hurry. But his Buddy Rich Melman is mega rich, with tons of the places to advertise and unless I am not aware, they don't have any ads with Mike. Feldco and Great Outdoors are COMCAST clients and I am sure, COMCAST has made sure North does not contact these people. With the economy the way it is and ad dollars being so tight, why would anyone risk/waste money advertising on his show? The ratings are in the tank, he's a moron and he "could" be in for some legal trouble- so why would anyone put up money for that? None of his "friends" or former sponsors could put up enough money to replace the Hernandez money, which is now gone and maybe forfeited. Sound business practices would tell anyone to stay away from him. Please post the rating numbers for MITM. Thanks. |
|
| Author: | Frontman [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Scorehead wrote: Please post the rating numbers for MITM. Thanks. "Dem ratings numbers are flawed. We didn't succeed on Comcast 'cause dey never put up a billboard for da show." Mike North, late 2009/early 2010. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
Scorehead wrote: Score is doomed wrote: bigfan wrote: I am surprised that North has nothing in the way of sponsors. Even some of the smaller guys who used to step up. Regardless if you like or hate Mike, the guy does have a TV show and (i think) a salesperson or two? Even he has to be in shock at how little ad time he has garnished. One of his defenders I know, and most of you hate, said that it had something to do with contacting former sponsors of the Score. I then brought up The Little Guys and that discussion ended in a hurry. But his Buddy Rich Melman is mega rich, with tons of the places to advertise and unless I am not aware, they don't have any ads with Mike. Feldco and Great Outdoors are COMCAST clients and I am sure, COMCAST has made sure North does not contact these people. With the economy the way it is and ad dollars being so tight, why would anyone risk/waste money advertising on his show? The ratings are in the tank, he's a moron and he "could" be in for some legal trouble- so why would anyone put up money for that? None of his "friends" or former sponsors could put up enough money to replace the Hernandez money, which is now gone and maybe forfeited. Sound business practices would tell anyone to stay away from him. Please post the rating numbers for MITM. Thanks. You, Bebe, Knuckles, Tom Dreesen, Pete Rose, Mike Ditka and Johnny "Quarters" Boyle. |
|
| Author: | Beebo [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
For Mike to succeed at anything, he's going to have to operate under the umbrella of a real management company. The days of Bebe as COO and Spaceball are over. And that's assuming North comes out of this Hernandez/Ponzi scheme deal clean. Seriously, is he going to come out this deal being so stupid he didn't do a proper background check? Or will it be learned he did do one, and decided to roll the dice anyhow? |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nothing for North? |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|