It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 7:07 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:54 pm
Posts: 301
pizza_Place: sausage
Bearly Legal featuring Chet Coppock as guest host today with me, David Spada.
Frank Layden gives his take on the state of the Bullls, new coach Tom Thibodeau, and the Kobe v MJ Debate. Then, Milt Pappas talks Cubs, Ron Santo, and blown perfect games. Finally, we look back on the White Sox' magical 1983 season with Rich Dotson.

http://www.talkzone.com/episodes/199/2462.html

_________________
Listen to current and past Bearly Legal Shows at http://www.talkzone.com/previousepisodes/155/1401.html
THANKS TO BIG FAN FOR LINKING MY SHOW FOR ME!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
I'm gonna need a hat.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
David,you should include the info listed below,to make your guests more relevant.
Perhaps some folks on here are smart enough to go back 30 years.


In physics, spacetime (or space–time; or space/time) is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single continuum. Spacetime is usually interpreted with space being three-dimensional and time playing the role of a fourth dimension that is of a different sort from the spatial dimensions. According to certain Euclidean space perceptions, the universe has three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. By combining space and time into a single manifold, physicists have significantly simplified a large number of physical theories, as well as described in a more uniform way the workings of the universe at both the supergalactic and subatomic levels.

In classical mechanics, the use of Euclidean space instead of spacetime is appropriate, as time is treated as universal and constant, being independent of the state of motion of an observer. In relativistic contexts, however, time cannot be separated from the three dimensions of space, because the observed rate at which time passes for an object depends on the object's velocity relative to the observer and also on the strength of intense gravitational fields, which can slow the passage of time

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:12 pm 
Image


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Baby McNown wrote:
Image


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
jimmypasta wrote:
David,you should include the info listed below,to make your guests more relevant.
Perhaps some folks on here are smart enough to go back 30 years.


In physics, spacetime (or space–time; or space/time) is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single continuum. Spacetime is usually interpreted with space being three-dimensional and time playing the role of a fourth dimension that is of a different sort from the spatial dimensions. According to certain Euclidean space perceptions, the universe has three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. By combining space and time into a single manifold, physicists have significantly simplified a large number of physical theories, as well as described in a more uniform way the workings of the universe at both the supergalactic and subatomic levels.

In classical mechanics, the use of Euclidean space instead of spacetime is appropriate, as time is treated as universal and constant, being independent of the state of motion of an observer. In relativistic contexts, however, time cannot be separated from the three dimensions of space, because the observed rate at which time passes for an object depends on the object's velocity relative to the observer and also on the strength of intense gravitational fields, which can slow the passage of time

LMFAO!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
jimmypasta wrote:
David,you should include the info listed below,to make your guests more relevant.
Perhaps some folks on here are smart enough to go back 30 years.


In physics, spacetime (or space–time; or space/time) is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single continuum. Spacetime is usually interpreted with space being three-dimensional and time playing the role of a fourth dimension that is of a different sort from the spatial dimensions. According to certain Euclidean space perceptions, the universe has three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. By combining space and time into a single manifold, physicists have significantly simplified a large number of physical theories, as well as described in a more uniform way the workings of the universe at both the supergalactic and subatomic levels.

In classical mechanics, the use of Euclidean space instead of spacetime is appropriate, as time is treated as universal and constant, being independent of the state of motion of an observer. In relativistic contexts, however, time cannot be separated from the three dimensions of space, because the observed rate at which time passes for an object depends on the object's velocity relative to the observer and also on the strength of intense gravitational fields, which can slow the passage of time


A couple of thousand years or so ago, the incommensurability of discrete numbers - not to mention the continuous physical magnitudes - essentially destroyed the Pythagorean cult, so to speak. Now in modern times, the incompatibility of the Discrete Theory of Matter, and the Continuous Theory of Spacetime, complicates and even threatens the theoretical community with a similar fate.

With the rise of so-called String Theory, hopes of reconciling Quantum physics with Continuous physics has arisen, only to inflate into a landscape of near infinite possibilities and, with that, the prospect of describing the physical laws of a concurrently unique and predictable universe diminished significantly. Even worse, our very notion of space now appears to be brought under examination for similar reasons.

This leads to the seemingly inevitable conclusion that both space and time, as we know them today, are “doomed,” as fundamental entities of theoretical physics. Since no one yet knows how to do Physics without time, Einstein's notion of Spacetime - more specifically, the dimension of Time in Spacetime - must have its validity questioned in the same way Pythagorean 'algebra' was examined (and eventually dismissed) as the basis for the science of Pure Time.

I guess. I just think we don't know shit about shit, like a 3-year old trying to understand nuclear fission. "Time" is a conceptual handicap that we 'live' with and hampers our ability to understand Physics, Time, and anything beyond the so-called Fourth Dimension.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Last edited by Don Tiny on Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Don Tiny wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
David,you should include the info listed below,to make your guests more relevant.
Perhaps some folks on here are smart enough to go back 30 years.


In physics, spacetime (or space–time; or space/time) is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single continuum. Spacetime is usually interpreted with space being three-dimensional and time playing the role of a fourth dimension that is of a different sort from the spatial dimensions. According to certain Euclidean space perceptions, the universe has three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. By combining space and time into a single manifold, physicists have significantly simplified a large number of physical theories, as well as described in a more uniform way the workings of the universe at both the supergalactic and subatomic levels.

In classical mechanics, the use of Euclidean space instead of spacetime is appropriate, as time is treated as universal and constant, being independent of the state of motion of an observer. In relativistic contexts, however, time cannot be separated from the three dimensions of space, because the observed rate at which time passes for an object depends on the object's velocity relative to the observer and also on the strength of intense gravitational fields, which can slow the passage of time


A couple of thousand years or so ago, the incommensurability of discrete numbers - not to mention the continuous physical magnitudes - essentially destroyed the Pythagorean cult, so to speak. Now in modern times, the incompatibility of the Discrete Theory of Matter, and the Continuous Theory of Spacetime, complicates and even threatens the theoretical community with a similar fate.

With the rise of so-called String Theory, hopes of reconciling Quantum physics with Continuous physics has arisen, only to inflate into a landscape of near infinite possibilities and, with that, the prospect of describing the physical laws of a concurrently unique and predictable universe diminished significantly. Even worse, our very notion of space now appears to be brought under examination for similar reasons.

This leads to the seemingly inevitable conclusion that both space and time, as we know them today, are “doomed,” as fundamental entities of theoretical physics. Since no one yet knows how to do Physics without time, Einstein's notion of Spacetime - more specifically, the dimension of Time in Spacetime - must have its validity questioned in the same way Pythagorean 'algebra' was examined (and eventually dismissed) as the basis for the science of Pure Time.

I guess.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Hey Spada, get that lesbian Ricketts broad on there. Have Robin Earl quiz her down about the state of the Cubs!! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Sorry ... hit submit before I was done.

And no, I'm not on drugs ... we've discussed this before. I did however take one generic Aleve tablet an hour or so ago.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group