| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| The Randazzler https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=70026 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue May 15, 2012 11:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | The Randazzler |
Wayne has been on tonight leading into Drinky Overnight. Not bad. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue May 15, 2012 11:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
I don't have Cinemax. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue May 15, 2012 11:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
You're lucky. Wayne and Matt back to back would be messy. |
|
| Author: | Dewskie [ Tue May 15, 2012 11:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
I've enjoyed it so far. Not bad at all. He's broaching Bernstein subjects but isn't drowning them in snide. |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Wed May 16, 2012 12:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
The Randazzler is already a better PBP Man than Farmio. Wayne should get the Sox job next year. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Wed May 16, 2012 9:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
It's not often that Wayne Randazzo gets an actual airshift to host a show on The SCORE besides doing "Scoreboard Updates". He said that Brent Morel might not be a Major League-quality third baseman over the long term. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed May 16, 2012 9:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
SHARK wrote: He said that Brent Morel might not be a Major League-quality third baseman over the long term. Well that eliminates his chance of ever calling Sox games. |
|
| Author: | Firefox [ Fri May 18, 2012 6:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
He's soooo smooth on the radio |
|
| Author: | Dewskie [ Fri May 18, 2012 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
I'd honestly be extremely pleased if he took over for Loho. I've been pretty impressed with the dazzler on his own. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon May 28, 2012 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
On again tonight til midnight. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon May 28, 2012 10:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Just heard Goff read a commercial for Tosh.0. Talk about phoning it in. Show some life Jason! |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon May 28, 2012 10:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
There are some pretty stupid callers calling in tonight. |
|
| Author: | Firefox [ Mon May 28, 2012 11:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Just heard Goff read a commercial for Tosh.0. Talk about phoning it in. Show some life Jason! rofl |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Anyone else out there listening to the Randazzler? |
|
| Author: | Killer V [ Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
The Dazzler has been on since early this morning! He was doing updates and co-hosting with Rosenbloom, in for M & H...then doing updates all day...now hosting for an hour of fill-in until they get some schmucks to come in and take over. Marathon man! |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Killer V wrote: The Dazzler has been on since early this morning! He was doing updates and co-hosting with Rosenbloom, in for M & H...then doing updates all day...now hosting for an hour of fill-in until they get some schmucks to come in and take over. Marathon man! Wow didn't realize he had been there all day. I heard him doing up dates for Bernsie. Just figured it was this afternoon and evening. |
|
| Author: | donspiracy [ Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Smooth radio voice. Enjoy his show. |
|
| Author: | Killer V [ Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
And back on this morning... Though this pairing really doesn't work. The Dazzler is clearly here for the support of Rosenbloom and to do updates. He's not adding much, if anything this morning... |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Killer V wrote: And back on this morning... Though this pairing really doesn't work. The Dazzler is clearly here for the support of Rosenbloom and to do updates. He's not adding much, if anything this morning... Agreed, though I thought he was doing pretty well winning his side of an argument for Lovie's lack of honesty at pressers. |
|
| Author: | Tad Queasy [ Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote: Killer V wrote: And back on this morning... Though this pairing really doesn't work. The Dazzler is clearly here for the support of Rosenbloom and to do updates. He's not adding much, if anything this morning... Agreed, though I thought he was doing pretty well winning his side of an argument for Lovie's lack of honesty at pressers. Is that all Rosenbloom ever talks about or do I just have the misfortune of tuning in when he happens to be talking about it? |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
I believe it was The Randazzler that I heard last night hosting around 11pm that was offering up the idea that the Packers might actually rather lose this week and then play the Vikings again at home the following week rather than have an off-week. Which goes to show, I think, that if you listen to sports radio long enough, you'll hear every crazy-ass notion possible. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I believe it was The Randazzler that I heard last night hosting around 11pm that was offering up the idea that the Packers might actually rather lose this week and then play the Vikings again at home the following week rather than have an off-week. Which goes to show, I think, that if you listen to sports radio long enough, you'll hear every crazy-ass notion possible. Remember a few years back when the Bears took it easy on the Packers in game 16? The Pack got in the playoffs and beat the Bears in the NFC championship. I still think Lovies biggest mistake in his regime (besides not running more in the SB) is going "easy" on the Packers in that game. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
That game didn't mean anything to the Bears. They already had a bye wrapped up. I think even Lovie Smith would have tried to win the final season game and not have to play an extra playoff game if he needed to. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: That game didn't mean anything to the Bears. They already had a bye wrapped up. I think even Lovie Smith would have tried to win the final season game and not have to play an extra playoff game if he needed to. In the end,it did mean everything. They could have knocked the Pack out of the playoffs. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I believe it was The Randazzler that I heard last night hosting around 11pm that was offering up the idea that the Packers might actually rather lose this week and then play the Vikings again at home the following week rather than have an off-week. It will be interesting to see what happens if the Vikings get up by more than 2 touchdowns. I bet the Packers have a plan to rest the starters for the second half if that happens.
|
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I believe it was The Randazzler that I heard last night hosting around 11pm that was offering up the idea that the Packers might actually rather lose this week and then play the Vikings again at home the following week rather than have an off-week. It will be interesting to see what happens if the Vikings get up by more than 2 touchdowns. I bet the Packers have a plan to rest the starters for the second half if that happens.Well, that would be different than not trying to win the game at all because you would rather play the extra game against the Vikings than to rest. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I believe it was The Randazzler that I heard last night hosting around 11pm that was offering up the idea that the Packers might actually rather lose this week and then play the Vikings again at home the following week rather than have an off-week. It will be interesting to see what happens if the Vikings get up by more than 2 touchdowns. I bet the Packers have a plan to rest the starters for the second half if that happens.Well, that would be different than not trying to win the game at all because you would rather play the extra game against the Vikings than to rest. The Packers will obviously try and win. It's not just important to have the bye, but I wouldn't want to go on the road to any of the other places. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The Randazzler |
I don't think they'll rest anybody unless/until they are absolutely out of it late in the game. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|