If only that were true.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Hawk v Stoney https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=72247 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Hawk v Stoney |
This morning during the MH spectacular radio show, Stoney pointed out that Floyd leads with his hip and needs to keep it closed as long as possible, despite what some people say about leading with his chest. Now I had no idea who Stone was talking about, until....Mac mentions that Hawk says that Gavin leads with his chest. So when Stone says 'Despite those who says he leads with his chest" he means Hawk...hmmmm. |
|
| Author: | denisdman [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Rather inconsequential don't you think? Hawk says tons of crap every game....at least half is horse bleep. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Not when your partner comes on the air and says 'Despite what some people think"...and he is referring to his 'broadcast partner' One day Stoney will break bad on Hawk in his next gig, but of course not say anything directly. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Remember when Stoney and Ron Santo didn't speak for a while? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
spmack wrote: Remember when Stoney and Ron Santo didn't speak for a while? One is a Hall of Famer, the other had one nice season. I could see why there'd be tension. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Stoney is no Angel. I think some guys might even appreciate it more if he came out and said what he means with many of his comments. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
badrogue17 wrote: spmack wrote: Remember when Stoney and Ron Santo didn't speak for a while? One is a Hall of Famer*, the other had one nice season. I could see why there'd be tension. Fixed that for you. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
I hate you. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
| If only that were true. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
bigfan wrote: Stoney is no Angel. I think some guys might even appreciate it more if he came out I'm sure a few guys in Wrigleyville agree with this statement alone. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
spmack wrote: bigfan wrote: Stoney is no Angel. I think some guys might even appreciate it more if he came out I'm sure a few guys in Wrigleyville agree with this statement alone. Steve Stone walking into Hydrate wrote: Everyone I knew here is dead
|
|
| Author: | Rod [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
spmack wrote: bigfan wrote: Stoney is no Angel. I think some guys might even appreciate it more if he came out I'm sure a few guys in Wrigleyville agree with this statement alone.  Awesome, spmack.
|
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Hawk is the suck |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
bigfan wrote: Stoney is no Angel. I think some guys might even appreciate it more if he came out and said what he means with many of his comments. I would, I like Stone and I think he is one of the sharper baseball analysts around..but he should have more balls and speak directly more often. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
312player wrote: bigfan wrote: Stoney is no Angel. I think some guys might even appreciate it more if he came out and said what he means with many of his comments. I would, I like Stone and I think he is one of the sharper baseball analysts around..but he should have more balls and speak directly more often. Lou Pinella said it best about Stoney. However, I do know for a fact Stone was willing to be a front office guy if a certain town got a franchise. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
I thought Stone kinda debunked all that ...Thought I heard Stone say he has turned down a couple G.M. offers ..no? |
|
| Author: | Scooter [ Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Stone talks a great amount but knows little. That is why he has never had a front office job in MLB. Perhaps Lou was spot on. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Stone has turned down front office jobs, you think that dummy Harrelson knows his shit?..one of the worst G.M.s in history. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
I think Stone is a good broadcaster but Sox games were far and away more enjoyable during Paciorek's brief return. Hawk and Whimpy on TV and Stone and Farmer on the radio would be fine with me. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
312player wrote: Stone has turned down front office jobs, . You got a source on that? |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
NO....but I believe I heard him say it on the score..believe someone asked him..perhaps BB? and he confirmed that he has turned down a G.M. opportunity. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
Watched the game on YES last night. The Yankee announcers were making fun of how far apart Stoney and Hawk sit. |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
good dolphin wrote: I think Stone is a good broadcaster but Sox games were far and away more enjoyable during Paciorek's brief return. Hawk and Whimpy on TV and Stone and Farmer on the radio would be fine with me. Subtract St. Rita's finest(?) from that setup & we'll be in complete agreement. |
|
| Author: | Firefox [ Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hawk v Stoney |
I don't think they like each other much. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|