| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Spring Ratings https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=80364 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Northside_Dan [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Spring Ratings |
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/co ... 565.column 25-54 Year Olds Overall WSCR 4th 4.7 share WMVP 16th 2.4 Morning Drive Mully and Hanley 3rd 6.8 Mike and Mike 10th 2.9 Afternoon Drive B&B 2nd 5.2 W&S 16th 2.6  That's a 3 month sample for W&S which also includes a bump from Bulls playoffs All Hail the Kings 
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
I guess maybe Waddle should have showed up to DAY FUCKING ONE of the new timeslot of the show that begins with his last name. Seems the actual kings are.... 
|
|
| Author: | SteveSarley [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Northside_Dan wrote: No man that age should be wearing a shirt unbuttoned that low unless his name is Harry Belafonte. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
OMG THE SCORE IS RUINED AHHHHH!!!! |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
interesting quote in the paper from mitch talking about the continuity of the WSCR lineup. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Rare photo of Terry's wife |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Looks like ESPN needs to take this shit a bit more seriously. Don't just reshuffle the decks, or move around the deck chairs....really retool the station. -I think it's J-Hoods turn for a shot at the throne. He's as solid as they come, for the most part and he's spent his time in radio jail. -Bring in some new blood. As for M&H....I don't, their ratings are disturbing and a poor reflection on the populace. Although they are Chicago based sports talk and that's what the people want? Maybe? But I think it's clear that ESPN's shuffle has failed. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Listened to J Hood last night as Sox were on. Forgot how comfy his show makes me feel. Anyone have the Mac ratings and what did Mithc say in interview? I am not signing up with the Trib site. |
|
| Author: | newper [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
"With ESPN, you have to focus on all of our platforms," Delevitt said. "Nobody can duplicate what we're doing on every platform." |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
SomeGuy wrote: Although they are Chicago based sports talk and that's what the people want? Maybe? Ya think? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Hatchetman wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Although they are Chicago based sports talk and that's what the people want? Maybe? Ya think? Ya, but it's horrible sports talk....horrible, Hatchetman! This just shows you how M&M and their crap doesn't fly in this market. How about a real Chicago oriented sports talk show, ESPN? That would cost money, though. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
newper wrote: "With ESPN, you have to focus on all of our platforms," Delevitt said. "Nobody can duplicate what we're doing on every platform." Fucking business school
|
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
I imagine ESPN radio as a whole makes a lot of money from national accounts. So regardless of Chicago's ratings relative to the score they are making tons of cash. S&W are probably thought of as a bone thrown to local fans and that slot is not taken as a huge thing. I am really surprised they run local at all anymore. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
pittmike wrote: I am really surprised they run local at all anymore. Concur. How much worse would their ratings be just running a national stream? |
|
| Author: | Northside_Dan [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Hatchetman wrote: pittmike wrote: I am really surprised they run local at all anymore. Concur. How much worse would their ratings be just running a national stream? Considering Mike and Mike pull better ratings than W&S. The option I'm sure has been discussed by higher ups. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
| Frank don't worry I have will have a nice signature ready for you come Jan 1st. 
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
pittmike wrote: I imagine ESPN radio as a whole makes a lot of money from national accounts. So regardless of Chicago's ratings relative to the score they are making tons of cash. S&W are probably thought of as a bone thrown to local fans and that slot is not taken as a huge thing. I am really surprised they run local at all anymore. Bring in North,Murph & Coppock to take over that slot. Now that would draw a crowd! |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Waddle is fucking brutal, if the score dumped Mulligan they would double that number. U put hood n silvy in n they beat any score show in any time slot. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Uh, guys.... What are you all talking about? The Score is "stale" and needs a shakeup; Scorehead has said that's the way it is, which means that's the way it is. Is he going to have to go outside to the DHS military man on his corner and tell them to enforce the community radio guidelines policy? I think he is. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
sinicalypse wrote: Uh, guys.... What are you all talking about? The Score is "stale" and needs a shakeup; Scorehead has said that's the way it is, which means that's the way it is. Is he going to have to go outside to the DHS military man on his corner and tell them to enforce the community radio guidelines policy? I think he is. I agree. It's like driving a working car with 150,000 miles on it. A new shiny car is just more exciting |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Terry's Peeps wrote: So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. I agree, they have a great show. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
The score does need a shake up. I use to listen daily multiple hours, great background noise..now I listen to maybe an hour a week. Mac loves to throw the term "tallest midget " around. The score is the tallest midget in sports radio here, Congrats...the station sucks, just not as bad as 1000. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Terry's Peeps wrote: So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. yep. the general narrative of "the score has no competition so it wins by default even though all of its shows are in decline" continues onward. I'm glad the DHS military dude made it over to your house so quickly, cuz even though he was slated to come over and see what this talk of "ReVolution" was all about; you know that whenever there's a complaint lodged by a blue-graded citizen like Scorehead, well, you get over there even quicker. All hail the truth of the great radio narrative! |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Terry's Peeps wrote: So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. i was going to ask what were their ratings from the last period.... that's a 20% drop.... what was MVP's rating from Jan? and I also want to see what was mcneil's ratings from the period were |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Terry's Peeps wrote: So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. That's a good point, Speeps. B&B are on the decline. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
Terry's Peeps wrote: So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. The perfect counter show would be one that chooses to argue with the athletes and management. A show that says Theo,Gar or whoever is anidiot. A show that doesn't mock a fanbase. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
B&B have gone down, while the same timeslot at AM1000 has gone up. Both fairly significantly. This trend will continue until the inevitable happens-- B&B are behind W&S in the ratings. |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Spring Ratings |
jimmypasta wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: So from January til now, B&B have gone from a 6.5 to a 5.2. But the story is how great B&B are. Makes perfect sense. The perfect counter show would be one that chooses to argue with the athletes and management. A show that says Theo,Gar or whoever is anidiot. A show that doesn't mock a fanbase. is your new show called "meatball nation"? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|