Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

Seacrest wrote:

LET IT GO.

Great answer to the question

bigfan wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

LET IT GO.

Great answer to the question

Everyone here knows why. You do too.

Dead Horses you like to beat...

Laurence
McCaskey's
White Sox
Wild Hare
Reinsdorf

LET IT GO.

Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays

Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation.

Will now address my alleged dead horse beating

Dead Horses you like to beat...

Laurence - Think he is terrible and will take my shots, but havent heard him in a long time, so cant even really mock him.
McCaskey's - Strange people, run a bad organization and at least 1 of them is antisemitic. Yup, gonna keep on that one.
White Sox - yeah, so?
Wild Hare - unless mentioned by someone else, nope.
Reinsdorf - never beaten, mentioned many times

Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. One would like I offended grandma ginny!

bigfan wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

LET IT GO.

Great answer to the question

Everyone here knows why. You do too.

Dead Horses you like to beat...

Laurence
McCaskey's
White Sox
Wild Hare
Reinsdorf

LET IT GO.

rogers park bryan wrote:

Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays

good answer

does he warn them to drive home safe?

bigfan wrote:

Good to see you clarified your silly remarks about all of the owners of the Bears.

Will you stop bitching about Laurence if I can get him to shake your hand?

YES OR NO

It will have to be at a remote of some sort.

Let me know when his next remote is announced.

Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays

bigfan wrote:

Seacrest is anti-semantic.

bigfan wrote:

The real estate I occupy in your head is expansive.

Seacrest wrote:

It will have to be at a remote of some sort.

Let me know when his next remote is announced.

So you want me to set it up for you to take credit? lol....I was not aware he even did remotes unless they assign him one of his prepaid sub days.

feel free to arrange it, as I have extended my hand in the past, would be happy to again.

bigfan wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

It will have to be at a remote of some sort.

Let me know when his next remote is announced.

I'm not looking for credit.

I'm looking to help you put an end to your boring, trite and jealousy fueled attacks on Laurence. They make you look small, vindictive and petty.

I picture the Seacrest peace brokering to look like the meeting of all the families in The Godfather....Sir walking around the table to embrace bigfan to the applause of the rest of the gathering

Author:	bigfan [ Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:50 am ]
Post subject:	Why No Leary?
I have to ask, as due to the high holiday, No Rosie, Roz, Berns, Spiegs, Mully , etc...not an unplanned scenario. Matty will be in with TB. Rosen smarts enough to keep Leary away from ManPat

Author:	Seacrest [ Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:51 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
LET IT GO.

Author:	IkeSouth [ Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
shut the fuck up man its like saying see oh oh see kay eye eeee around redskingregs mom

Author:	America [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:00 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Unplanned sceneerio.

Author:	bigfan [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:05 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Seacrest wrote: LET IT GO. Great answer to the question

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Why No Leary? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=156&t=89381	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Seacrest [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
bigfan wrote: Seacrest wrote: LET IT GO. Great answer to the question Everyone here knows why. You do too. Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence McCaskey's White Sox Wild Hare Reinsdorf LET IT GO.

Author:	billypootons [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:23 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?

Author:	bigfan [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:29 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Seacrest wrote: bigfan wrote: Seacrest wrote: LET IT GO. Great answer to the question Everyone here knows why. You do too. Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence McCaskey's White Sox Wild Hare Reinsdorf LET IT GO. Funny, for a guy who claims I never give an answer, you seem to NEVER drop real answers. So, why is it because he is that bad, they try to avoid having him on the air?

Author:	bigfan [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 10:40 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Will now address my alleged dead horse beating Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence - Think he is terrible and will take my shots, but havent heard him in a long time, so cant even really mock him. McCaskey's - Strange people, run a bad organization and at least 1 of them is antisemitic. Yup, gonna keep on that one. White Sox - yeah, so? Wild Hare - unless mentioned by someone else, nope. Reinsdorf - never beaten, mentioned many times Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. One would like I offended grandma ginny!

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:46 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays

Author:	bigfan [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:21 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
rogers park bryan wrote: Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays good answer does he warn them to drive home safe?

Author:	Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
bigfan wrote: Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. Seacrest is anti-semantic.

Author:	Seacrest [ Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:36 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
bigfan wrote: Will now address my alleged dead horse beating Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence - Think he is terrible and will take my shots, but havent heard him in a long time, so cant even really mock him. McCaskey's - Strange people, run a bad organization and at least 1 of them is antisemitic. Yup, gonna keep on that one. White Sox - yeah, so? Wild Hare - unless mentioned by someone else, nope. Reinsdorf - never beaten, mentioned many times Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. One would like I offended grandma ginny! Good to see you clarified your silly remarks about all of the owners of the Bears. Will you stop bitching about Laurence if I can get him to shake your hand? YES OR NO

Author:	Douchebag [ Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:39 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Seacrest wrote: bigfan wrote: Seacrest wrote: LET IT GO. Great answer to the question Everyone here knows why. You do too. Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence McCaskey's White Sox Wild Hare Reinsdorf LET IT GO. Hillary Clinton Obama Rahm HBO series Girls Frank

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Baby McNown [ Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
bigfan wrote: Will now address my alleged dead horse beating Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence - Think he is terrible and will take my shots, but havent heard him in a long time, so cant even really mock him. McCaskey's - Strange people, run a bad organization and at least 1 of them is antisemitic. Yup, gonna keep on that one. White Sox - yeah, so? Wild Hare - unless mentioned by someone else, nope. Reinsdorf - never beaten, mentioned many times Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. One would like I offended grandma ginny! The real estate I occupy in your head is expansive.

Author:	Matches Malone [ Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
bigfan wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays good answer does he warn them to drive home safe? Poor Ed Farmer.

Author:	bigfan [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:29 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Seacrest wrote: bigfan wrote: Will now address my alleged dead horse beating Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence - Think he is terrible and will take my shots, but havent heard him in a long time, so cant even really mock him. McCaskey's - Strange people, run a bad organization and at least 1 of them is antisemitic. Yup, gonna keep on that one. White Sox - yeah, so? Wild Hare - unless mentioned by someone else, nope. Reinsdorf - never beaten, mentioned many times Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. One would like I offended grandma ginny! Good to see you clarified your silly remarks about all of the owners of the Bears. Will you stop bitching about Laurence if I can get him to shake your hand? YES OR NO YES....when you gonna make that happen?

Author:	Seacrest [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:53 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
It will have to be at a remote of some sort. Let me know when his next remote is announced.

Author:	bigfan [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Seacrest wrote: It will have to be at a remote of some sort. Let me know when his next remote is announced. So you want me to set it up for you to take credit? lol....I was not aware he even did remotes unless they assign him one of his prepaid sub days. feel free to arrange it, as I have extended my hand in the past, would be happy to again.

Author:	Telegram Sam [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:01 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
rogers park bryan wrote: Because Laurence is so respectful of the Jewish People he celebrates their holidays ♫Hava Ne-gee-la♫ Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: bigfan wrote: Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. Seacrest is anti-semantic.

Author:	bigfan [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:03 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Baby McNown wrote: bigfan wrote: Will now address my alleged dead horse beating Dead Horses you like to beat... Laurence - Think he is terrible and will take my shots, but havent heard him in a long time, so cant even really mock him. McCaskey's - Strange people, run a bad organization and at least 1 of them is antisemitic. Yup, gonna keep on that one. White Sox - yeah, so? Wild Hare - unless mentioned by someone else, nope. Reinsdorf - never beaten, mentioned many times Ever since I dropped the Mccaskey antisemitic remarks, Seacrest has been almost as McNown Butthurt as I have ever seen him and in the end I wasnt wrong, seacrest just wanted more a detailed explanation of the exact situation, we got into semantics about the whole situation. One would like I offended grandma ginny! The real estate I occupy in your head is expansive. So because I associate you with being Butthurt, you think thats good?

Author:	Seacrest [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
bigfan wrote: Seacrest wrote: It will have to be at a remote of some sort. Let me know when his next remote is announced. So you want me to set it up for you to take credit? lol....I was not aware he even did remotes unless they assign him one of his prepaid sub days. feel free to arrange it, as I have extended my hand in the past, would be happy to again. I'm not looking for credit. I'm looking to help you put an end to your boring, trite and jealousy fueled attacks on Laurence. They make you look small, vindictive and petty.

Author:	bigfan [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
Seacrest wrote: bigfan wrote: Seacrest wrote: It will have to be at a remote of some sort. Let me know when his next remote is announced. So you want me to set it up for you to take credit? lol....I was not aware he even did remotes unless they assign him one of his prepaid sub days. feel free to arrange it, as I have extended my hand in the past, would be happy to again. I'm not looking for credit. I'm looking to help you put an end to your boring, trite and jealousy fueled attacks on Laurence. They make you look small, vindictive and petty. No thanks, I think you and others thrive on my petty jeaoulsy of a substitue radio guy who oggles after white women he calls friends.

Author:	Baby McNown [ Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:08 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
The thickness of your skin makes LoHo look like the toughest of tough guys.

Author:	good dolphin [ Mon Sep 29, 2014 8:45 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
I picture the Seacrest peace brokering to look like the meeting of all the families in The Godfather....Sir walking around the table to embrace bigfan to the applause of the rest of the gathering

Author:	Seacrest [ Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:31 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Why No Leary?
good dolphin wrote: I picture the Seacrest peace brokering to look like the meeting of all the families in The Godfather....Sir walking around the table to embrace bigfan to the applause of the rest of the gathering Something like that. BF will be off to the side doing his best Frankie Pantangelo.