jackref wrote:
IMU doesn't hit women - easy pick.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=171&t=120965 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Voting goes until Tuesday at noon. Participants are encouraged to solicit/beg/threaten for votes. Vote by PM or by voting in this thread. (3)IMU (14)312player My Take:A player vs someone who is definitely not a player |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 |
|
| Author: | Harvard Dan [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 Player. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
PocketPool Player |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Eye Em You |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Fast Track |
|
| Author: | jackref [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU doesn't hit women - easy pick. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
jackref wrote: IMU doesn't hit women - easy pick.
|
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
jackref wrote: IMU doesn't hit women - easy pick. Only because they'd probably hit back and I'm not trying to get laid out. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 is so Chicago. I am a Bears fan. I am voting for the Bears fan.. |
|
| Author: | Telegram Sam [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Nas wrote: 312 is so Chicago. I am a Bears fan. I am voting for the Bears fan.. I am indirectly responsible for the deaths of more cows and pigs than probably anybody on this board. |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | Furious Styles [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Does IMU post here anymore? 312player |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Nas wrote: 312 is so Chicago. I am a Bears fan. I am voting for the Bears fan.. 
|
|
| Author: | Drunk Squirrel [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Author: | Ron Wolfley [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
easy as 312 |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
Eye yam ewe |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
312 |
|
| Author: | shirtless driver [ Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: CFMB North Rd. 1:(3)IMU vs. (14)312player |
IMU |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|