It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:23 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 199 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Besides the Lebron Wade and Bosh situaton in which none of them were coming here anyway what stars have made it to free agency that the Bulls should have gotten?

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Yes there is. Rose seems very happy and content here.

they fell into that pick and he is a Chicago guy. It's sad that he'll likely finish his career in Chicago without a championship. You're not really refuting my point with that comment.

Thats ridiculous speculation on your part. Look at what Dirk did with the Mavs. Im sure Dallas fans were saying the same thing. They are really only a piece or two away. They dont need a huge LeBron-like star.

When is the last big time FA, outside of LeBron, who transformed a team into a championship team? LeBron and Shaq are really the only guys I can think of in the past 15 years.

Edit: And yes, what I said directly refutes your point. Perhaps your point was poorly worded?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Besides the Lebron Wade and Bosh situaton in which none of them were coming here anyway what stars have made it to free agency that the Bulls should have gotten?

I would have taken Rudy Gay, and I would have gone after Bosh hardcore. They were never going to get LeBron & Wade, I understand that. Scola? Stoudemire?

So you're saying you think that the Bulls can attract big names? Yes or no?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Besides the Lebron Wade and Bosh situaton in which none of them were coming here anyway what stars have made it to free agency that the Bulls should have gotten?

I don't think it was a given that Bosh was going to Miami.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Besides the Lebron Wade and Bosh situaton in which none of them were coming here anyway what stars have made it to free agency that the Bulls should have gotten?

I would have taken Rudy Gay, and I would have gone after Bosh hardcore. They were never going to get LeBron & Wade, I understand that. Scola? Stoudemire?

So you're saying you think that the Bulls can attract big names? Yes or no?

- Gay resigned with Memphis. That literally was impossible to ask them to do.
-Stoudemire is garbage and will almost certainly be out of the league before Boozer
-They went after Bosh. Still, he hasnt been a better player than Boozer has the past two seasons.
- Scola is a latin Carlos Boozer with a much better contract

K. What else?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Besides the Lebron Wade and Bosh situaton in which none of them were coming here anyway what stars have made it to free agency that the Bulls should have gotten?

I would have taken Rudy Gay, and I would have gone after Bosh hardcore. They were never going to get LeBron & Wade, I understand that. Scola? Stoudemire?

So you're saying you think that the Bulls can attract big names? Yes or no?

The Bulls would be in worse shape with Stoudamire than Boozer :lol: Rudy Gay is an OK player but not an upgrade over Deng IMO and oh my god Luis Scola? Seirously? And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Howard wasn't a free agent either. He was traded and he would only agree to two teams because he is a dope. Does that mean that the other 27 teams in the league that aren't the Nets or Lakers are awful? Or does it mean Howard is a big baby that mangled his impending free ajency?

my main point was that the Bulls can't attract stars. I don't think there's an argument for that.

Besides the Lebron Wade and Bosh situaton in which none of them were coming here anyway what stars have made it to free agency that the Bulls should have gotten?

I don't think it was a given that Bosh was going to Miami.

I do. I think that team was formed in a back-alley deal in Beijing in 2008.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Phil McCracken wrote:
And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

Bingo! Phil McCrack's the case on this one.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Phil McCracken wrote:
The Bulls would be in worse shape with Stoudamire than Boozer :lol: Rudy Gay is an OK player but not an upgrade over Deng IMO and oh my god Luis Scola? Seirously? And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

wait...Gay is not an upgrade over Luol Deng? Really?

and I think Stoudemire would have been a great player with Rose. Obviously that is opinion. What is not opinion is that Tom thinks Taj Gibson is a better player than Boozer. Or at least that the Bulls are a better team at the end of the game with Gibson on the floor.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Look what has come of me boldly suggesting that the Bulls were run poorly between Jordan and Rose.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

Bingo! Phil McCrack's the case on this one.

see, I understand that. But this is Chicago. They should be doing better than most NBA teams.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Curious Hair wrote:
Look what has come of me boldly suggesting that the Bulls were run poorly between Jordan and Rose.

and I initially wasn't defending what you said, because I don't think that the Bulls are incredibly poorly run. They just seem to want to build in a OKC manner but they can't draft like OKC.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

Bingo! Phil McCrack's the case on this one.

see, I understand that. But this is Chicago. They should be doing better than most NBA teams.

They are doing better than most teams.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
The Bulls would be in worse shape with Stoudamire than Boozer :lol: Rudy Gay is an OK player but not an upgrade over Deng IMO and oh my god Luis Scola? Seirously? And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

wait...Gay is not an upgrade over Luol Deng? Really?

and I think Stoudemire would have been a great player with Rose. Obviously that is opinion. What is not opinion is that Tom thinks Taj Gibson is a better player than Boozer. Or at least that the Bulls are a better team at the end of the game with Gibson on the floor.

Gay is not really much better than Deng, no.

Gibson is better at the end of games than Boozer. The Bulls usually are protecting a lead at that point. Its the converse of the same logical reasoning behind having Boozer start games.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

Bingo! Phil McCrack's the case on this one.

see, I understand that. But this is Chicago. They should be doing better than most NBA teams.

They are doing better than most teams.

well, there it is then. I completely disagree that Chicago should be the 5th to 6th best team in the NBA.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
The Bulls would be in worse shape with Stoudamire than Boozer :lol: Rudy Gay is an OK player but not an upgrade over Deng IMO and oh my god Luis Scola? Seirously? And honestly no I don't believe the Bulls have a problem attracting stars. I just think that stars in the NBA are a limited commodity and every team has trouble getting more than one or two on the roster. That's why its tough to build a championship roster.

wait...Gay is not an upgrade over Luol Deng? Really?

and I think Stoudemire would have been a great player with Rose. Obviously that is opinion. What is not opinion is that Tom thinks Taj Gibson is a better player than Boozer. Or at least that the Bulls are a better team at the end of the game with Gibson on the floor.

Gay is not really much better than Deng, no.

Gibson is better at the end of games than Boozer. The Bulls usually are protecting a lead at that point. Its the converse of the same logical reasoning behind having Boozer start games.

if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
City of Fools wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Look what has come of me boldly suggesting that the Bulls were run poorly between Jordan and Rose.

and I initially wasn't defending what you said, because I don't think that the Bulls are incredibly poorly run. They just seem to want to build in a OKC manner but they can't draft like OKC.

And I'll concede that at least Reinsdorf negotiated with an agent on Thibodeau's behalf, which was a real breakthrough for him. Defend that little quirk.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
well, there it is then. I completely disagree that Chicago should be the 5th to 6th best team in the NBA.

:lol: :lol:

Well shit, me too.

White Sox should be the best team in MLB.
The Packers should be the best team in the NFL.
The Bulls should be the best team in the NBA.
The Blackhawks should be the best team in the NHL.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

They could amnesty Boozer at any time but have chosen not to. So there's that.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
City of Fools wrote:
wait...Gay is not an upgrade over Luol Deng? Really?


Player 1

19.0 PPG

6.4 RPG

2.3 APG

31% 3point FG %

2.5 Turnovers per game

Player 2

15.3 PPG

6.5 RPG

1.5 APG

36% 3point FG %

1.8 Turnovers per game

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Last edited by Phil McCracken on Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

The Bulls could unload Boozer right now. He could be off their cap by dinner time tonight if they wanted him to be.

I agree that they SHOULD get rid of Boozer and that Taj is better all-around player. It's hard to argue against that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

They could amnesty Boozer at any time but have chosen not to. So there's that.

Go away Phil. You keep saying the same thing as me, only quicker. Im starting to hate you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
and as for Gay versus Deng, I think over the long haul that Gay will prove to be the better player. I am very skeptical of Deng having another season like his last.

:lol: stupid keyboard. Chicago should be in the top 3 in the NBA. No other sport is so media market centered.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

The Bulls could unload Boozer right now. He could be off their cap by dinner time tonight if they wanted him to be.

I agree that they SHOULD get rid of Boozer and that Taj is better all-around player. It's hard to argue against that.

so...they really didn't need Boozer, did they?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
wait...Gay is not an upgrade over Luol Deng? Really?


Player 1

19.0 PPG

6.4 RPG

2.3 APG

31% 3point FG %

2.5 Turnovers per game

Player 2

15.3 PPG

6.5 RPG

1.5 APG

36% 3point FG %

1.8 Turnovers per game

Player 2 is also a much better defender, and a good argument can be made that Player 1's team plays better without him. So there's that too.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
FavreFan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

They could amnesty Boozer at any time but have chosen not to. So there's that.

Go away Phil. You keep saying the same thing as me, only quicker. Im starting to hate you.

I am more worried about the fact that we are agreeing on something. The Mayans might be onto something.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

The Bulls could unload Boozer right now. He could be off their cap by dinner time tonight if they wanted him to be.

I agree that they SHOULD get rid of Boozer and that Taj is better all-around player. It's hard to argue against that.

so...they really didn't need Boozer, did they?

Hindsight is 20/20. We didnt know about Gibson yet. In the summer of 2010 they badly needed a PF. That fact is undeniable.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Phil McCracken wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

They could amnesty Boozer at any time but have chosen not to. So there's that.

Go away Phil. You keep saying the same thing as me, only quicker. Im starting to hate you.

I am more worried about the fact that we are agreeing on something. The Mayans might be onto something.

Dont worry. This happened for a short, worrisome time with Hank Scorpio too. Then he went back to being an idiot. Im assuming you'll likewise regress to the mean soon.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
if the Bulls could unload Boozer, they would. Taj is certainly a more rounded player.

The Bulls could unload Boozer right now. He could be off their cap by dinner time tonight if they wanted him to be.

I agree that they SHOULD get rid of Boozer and that Taj is better all-around player. It's hard to argue against that.

so...they really didn't need Boozer, did they?

Hindsight is 20/20. We didnt know about Gibson yet. In the summer of 2010 they badly needed a PF. That fact is undeniable.

I thought they needed a center more than a PF. And under no circumstances did they need Boozer.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
and as for Gay versus Deng, I think over the long haul that Gay will prove to be the better player. I am very skeptical of Deng having another season like his last.

:lol: stupid keyboard. Chicago should be in the top 3 in the NBA. No other sport is so media market centered.

:lol: Over the long haul?

I'm pretty sure we basically know who each one is. At best, they are equal. Deng is probably slightly better.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 199 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group