It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:55 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » DAN OR BERNSIE (DON'T CALL HIM BERNSTEIN) & WHOEVER

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 9 of 9
  [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
No Clever Moniker
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
chaspoppcap wrote:
Beardown wrote:
I agree. I think the Duke thing is really a nothing. But Dan wants it to be a something so he's gonna talk about it in a slow, cryptic tone. Because doing so makes it a something.


You know why he is going after Duke? Easy as pie, Duke is a Catholic institution.


No, they are a Methodist institution.

_________________
DRINK BƎTTƎR. @theRIPH
Top
 Profile  
 
No Clever Moniker
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
Godfella wrote:
If you notice, Bernstein always prefaces any claim with; "I'm told..." or "People close to the situation say..."

And then of course, no matter what Dan says, Terry chimes in with a "Yep, yep, that's what I heard, too!"

#BeOriginal


Which is why I think there may be a platform for legal actions. When one person goes about slandering the proof can be difficult. But Boers' parrot act puts him in a situation where if deposed he would either have to repeat what Dan told him or be guilty of slander.

_________________
DRINK BƎTTƎR. @theRIPH
Top
 Profile  
 
rogers park bryan
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
No Clever Moniker wrote:
Godfella wrote:
If you notice, Bernstein always prefaces any claim with; "I'm told..." or "People close to the situation say..."

And then of course, no matter what Dan says, Terry chimes in with a "Yep, yep, that's what I heard, too!"

#BeOriginal


Which is why I think there may be a platform for legal actions. When one person goes about slandering the proof can be difficult. But Boers' parrot act puts him in a situation where if deposed he would either have to repeat what Dan told him or be guilty of slander.

Terry would answer "that sounds about right" to every question on the stand
Top
 Profile  
 
Tall Midget
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:22 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
No Clever Moniker wrote:
Godfella wrote:
If you notice, Bernstein always prefaces any claim with; "I'm told..." or "People close to the situation say..."

And then of course, no matter what Dan says, Terry chimes in with a "Yep, yep, that's what I heard, too!"

#BeOriginal


Which is why I think there may be a platform for legal actions. When one person goes about slandering the proof can be difficult. But Boers' parrot act puts him in a situation where if deposed he would either have to repeat what Dan told him or be guilty of slander.


There's a basis for a lawsuit because Terry agreed with Dan's deliberately vague statements about what might be happening with Sharp?

Yeah, no.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Don Tiny
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
No Clever Moniker wrote:
Godfella wrote:
If you notice, Bernstein always prefaces any claim with; "I'm told..." or "People close to the situation say..."

And then of course, no matter what Dan says, Terry chimes in with a "Yep, yep, that's what I heard, too!"

#BeOriginal


Which is why I think there may be a platform for legal actions. When one person goes about slandering the proof can be difficult. But Boers' parrot act puts him in a situation where if deposed he would either have to repeat what Dan told him or be guilty of slander.


You should take a brief sabbatical from thinking.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George
Top
 Profile  
 
Score is doomed
PostPosted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 6:14 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
Did dannyboy spend any time today discussing Sharp?
Or was he told to drop the subject?
"my sources" tell me that one of the parties are planning to sue.
Top
 Profile  
 
No Clever Moniker
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
Futher Sharp talk after March 3.

Image

_________________
DRINK BƎTTƎR. @theRIPH
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
No Clever Moniker wrote:
Futher Sharp talk after March 3.
It's been mentioned.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 9 of 9
  [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » DAN OR BERNSIE (DON'T CALL HIM BERNSTEIN) & WHOEVER

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group