It is currently Tue Mar 25, 2025 7:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94119
Location: To the left of my post
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No way, ESPN am 1000 likes hosts that are more listener friendly. Not pompous, verbose asswipes that can't even get along with their teammates. Plus, his takes on sports are awful. He would be better off working a liberal station that focuses on politics, where he can just try to impress the audience with how evolved, woke and liberal he is.

It was funny when he made fun of you though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:31 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 34075
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because it was the other sports radio station that had to do it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94119
Location: To the left of my post
Beardown wrote:
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because of he other sports radio station had to do it?

It was a different time but Mac got fired from The Score and went to ESPN 1000 and it worked out pretty well for them.

COMMUNITY NOTE (by Elmhurst Steve):
Mac just made a comment about a sideline reporter having an inappropriate outfit on that looked like something suitable for an AVN convention. He didn't threaten anyone or their family. Really different.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:05 pm
Posts: 1760
Beardown wrote:
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because of he other sports radio station had to do it?


Hey, serious question: have you had a stroke or something? I'd really like to know, as your inane typo-filled posts certainly have a different vibe if there are medical things going on that would help explain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57123
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Beardown wrote:
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because of he other sports radio station had to do it?

It was a different time but Mac got fired from The Score and went to ESPN 1000 and it worked out pretty well for them.

The Score fired him in 2014 and 2020 but I think the first time he left was of his own volition. Wasn't it shortly after they paired him with Dan Jiggetts and the show was a disaster?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:43 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 34075
Harry Seaward wrote:
Beardown wrote:
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because of he other sports radio station had to do it?


Hey, serious question: have you had a stroke or something? I'd really like to know, as your inane typo-filled posts certainly have a different vibe if there are medical things going on that would help explain.


You hate me more than white women hate me. Which is saying a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17440
pizza_Place: Pequods
Brick wrote:
Beardown wrote:
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because of he other sports radio station had to do it?

It was a different time but Mac got fired from The Score and went to ESPN 1000 and it worked out pretty well for them.

Mac had a style that fit what ESPN wanted when they were creating MJ&H. Bernstein has a style that no one at WMVP wants in that building. The entire line-up hates his guts and says so in no uncertain terms.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17440
pizza_Place: Pequods
Curious Hair wrote:
Brick wrote:
Beardown wrote:
C’mon guys. Think about this for a second.

If Bernstein would have don the his at ESPN 1000 they would have fired him. So why would they hire him just because of he other sports radio station had to do it?

It was a different time but Mac got fired from The Score and went to ESPN 1000 and it worked out pretty well for them.

The Score fired him in 2014 and 2020 but I think the first time he left was of his own volition. Wasn't it shortly after they paired him with Dan Jiggetts and the show was a disaster?

2014 wasn't even a firing. It was Mac trying to hold out for more money when his contract was up and 670 holding their ground because it was the era where they could no longer justify the types of contracts that were given out earlier in the 2000s. It was more akin to an aging free agent thinking he is worth more than he is and the team letting him hit free agency to get a dose of reality

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 6:31 pm
Posts: 20
Location: Lake House
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No way, ESPN am 1000 likes hosts that are more listener friendly. Not pompous, verbose asswipes that can't even get along with their teammates. Plus, his takes on sports are awful. He would be better off working a liberal station that focuses on politics, where he can just try to impress the audience with how evolved, woke and liberal he is.

Yes! I think AM 820 is a longshot possibility. The money and the audience would be a lot less, but seems like Dan was tired of talking just sports and the ideology of this station would suit him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2811
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
zunk wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No way, ESPN am 1000 likes hosts that are more listener friendly. Not pompous, verbose asswipes that can't even get along with their teammates. Plus, his takes on sports are awful. He would be better off working a liberal station that focuses on politics, where he can just try to impress the audience with how evolved, woke and liberal he is.

Yes! I think AM 820 is a longshot possibility. The money and the audience would be a lot less, but seems like Dan was tired of talking just sports and the ideology of this station would suit him.


I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke

Of course, that doesn't explain Dan's Twitter addiction. But I believe, especially after this fish fiasco, Dan would want to talk about politics even less, not more


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12597
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No way, ESPN am 1000 likes hosts that are more listener friendly. Not pompous, verbose asswipes that can't even get along with their teammates. Plus, his takes on sports are awful. He would be better off working a liberal station that focuses on politics, where he can just try to impress the audience with how evolved, woke and liberal he is.


That's where he'll likely land, if he stays in talk radio. He was already turning the Score into that and couldn't keep his social/political thoughts to the side. He's been broken by DJT and should just own it now. If he wants to Chicago's version of Keith Olbermann, best riddance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39047
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2811
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
badrogue17 wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.


I'll put it in terms you can perhaps better understand: when the "politics" is simple bigotry, then yes more sports media have a take on politics*. Doesn't mean they want to become political media.

*BOTH SIDES


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:45 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12597
Reared on the Score wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.


I'll put it in terms you can perhaps better understand: when the "politics" is simple bigotry, then yes more sports media have a take on politics*. Doesn't mean they want to become political media.

*BOTH SIDES


Bernstein was bringing his views into quite a few topics, sometimes sports related, sometimes not. Also, Dan thinks of many opposing viewpoints as bigotry when most people would disagree with his very extreme point of view.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2811
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
BD wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.


I'll put it in terms you can perhaps better understand: when the "politics" is simple bigotry, then yes more sports media have a take on politics*. Doesn't mean they want to become political media.

*BOTH SIDES


Bernstein was bringing his views into quite a few topics, sometimes sports related, sometimes not. Also, Dan thinks of many opposing viewpoints as bigotry when most people would disagree with his very extreme point of view.


Dan: "I read Craig Calcaterra newsletter, everyone should, he wrote this about MLB team payrolls"

CSFMB white guy grievance committee: :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41511
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Have we got TheKapMan's thoughts on this?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83258
He's not going to 820. That station can barely cover the contracts for the old or never were that they currently employ.

I think Dan could make money with a podcast. I'd take a look. He already has the setup for he and his son.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 1:10 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41129
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
good dolphin wrote:
He's not going to 820. That station can barely cover the contracts for the old or never were that they currently employ.

I think Dan could make money with a podcast. I'd take a look. He already has the setup for he and his son.


Speaking of that where will that OWC go?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 1:45 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25974
pizza_Place: Pizanos
BD wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.


I'll put it in terms you can perhaps better understand: when the "politics" is simple bigotry, then yes more sports media have a take on politics*. Doesn't mean they want to become political media.

*BOTH SIDES


Bernstein was bringing his views into quite a few topics, sometimes sports related, sometimes not. Also, Dan thinks of many opposing viewpoints as bigotry when most people would disagree with his very extreme point of view.

He was definitely open about his anti-Christian views for years, particularly with respect to Catholics or evangelicals. It’s not like somebody demanded he air that bigotry or his hand was somehow forged.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23761
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Reared on the Score wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.


I'll put it in terms you can perhaps better understand: when the "politics" is simple bigotry, then yes more sports media have a take on politics*. Doesn't mean they want to become political media.

*BOTH SIDES

:lol: It took one dope kneeling during the national anthem for sports media personalities to begin insisting, in unison, that they can't do their job without acknowledging politics. Who you crappin'?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2811
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
He was definitely open about his anti-Christian views for years, particularly with respect to Catholics or evangelicals. It’s not like somebody demanded he air that bigotry or his hand was somehow forged.


I don't think he is anti Christian, just doesn't agree with that lifestyle (child molestation and female subjugation)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2811
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:

I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke


:lol: :lol: What a load of shit this is.


I'll put it in terms you can perhaps better understand: when the "politics" is simple bigotry, then yes more sports media have a take on politics*. Doesn't mean they want to become political media.

*BOTH SIDES

:lol: It took one dope kneeling during the national anthem for sports media personalities to begin insisting, in unison, that they can't do their job without acknowledging politics. Who you crappin'?


hmm, well, I can't make the same promise to you as I did to badrogue, as I don't think there's any framing of this argument that you would comprehend


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2811
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
to bring it back to the main point: I don't think Dan wants to become a liberal talk radio host

for one thing there's no immediate money nor long term career path in it. And the Twitter persona is something he's trying to therapy his way out of, not lean further into

it's so unlikely that it's actually more likely he'd do a disingenuous pivot towards anti cancel-culture


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:47 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25974
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Reared on the Score wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
He was definitely open about his anti-Christian views for years, particularly with respect to Catholics or evangelicals. It’s not like somebody demanded he air that bigotry or his hand was somehow forged.


I don't think he is anti Christian, just doesn't agree with that lifestyle (child molestation and female subjugation)

Yikes

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33450
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
The station was aghast that the SEC decided to play football during Covid, and Nebraska wanted to play too. “Those damn red states!”

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 33421
pizza_Place: What??
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
He was definitely open about his anti-Christian views for years, particularly with respect to Catholics or evangelicals. It’s not like somebody demanded he air that bigotry or his hand was somehow forged.


I don't think he is anti Christian, just doesn't agree with that lifestyle (child molestation and female subjugation)

Yikes

Let me take a gander at the Old Testament......Yikes. God and his chosen seem like real pricks. Perchance, are there orthodox jews in the world? Just asking a question.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57123
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Reared on the Score wrote:
zunk wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No way, ESPN am 1000 likes hosts that are more listener friendly. Not pompous, verbose asswipes that can't even get along with their teammates. Plus, his takes on sports are awful. He would be better off working a liberal station that focuses on politics, where he can just try to impress the audience with how evolved, woke and liberal he is.

Yes! I think AM 820 is a longshot possibility. The money and the audience would be a lot less, but seems like Dan was tired of talking just sports and the ideology of this station would suit him.


I think you're over-inflating Dan's interest in politics. Like most 'liberal' media members in the sports sector, they would likely prefer to Stick to Sports. It's when 'conservative' viewpoints (and not, like, the capital gains tax kind...) is legitimized and amplified (Conservative media is meant to impress the audience with how much of a shithead they are) it's mere human nature to speak up, that doesn't make you super woke

Of course, that doesn't explain Dan's Twitter addiction. But I believe, especially after this fish fiasco, Dan would want to talk about politics even less, not more


Yeah, as we've discussed before, Dan's so-called "far-left politics" are pretty inchoate and mostly consist of fashionable upper-middle-class social liberalism while maintaining the economic status quo. You can get the same thoughts from half of Evanston. For all the agonizing over him being too political, I can't recall him saying anything particularly incisive or thoughtful, mostly because the majority of his political content was retweeting other media figures who weren't very insightful themselves.

However, I will take every opportunity to remind people that kind of out of nowhere, Dan wrote a column about then-incipient Ukrainian Nazi movements all the way back in 2012. He got that one right!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23761
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Lame political takes are one thing, but when they're shoe-horned into a sports talk format by a pompous asshat who made his bones calling people gay and retarded it can get particularly galling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11230
pizza_Place: Depends
BD wrote:
Derplington wrote:
Seems like a no brainer. There's nothing compelling on that station currently.


I don't think ESPN would want to take a chance on someone who is clearly unhinged.

Dan also doesn't care about talking sports solely. He's been broken by DJT.


dan maneeel got nearly infinity chances because his ratings. i have to believe espn would be willing to take a shot, especially at the right cost, on bernstein.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2025 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11801
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
No way, ESPN am 1000 likes hosts that are more listener friendly. Not pompous, verbose asswipes that can't even get along with their teammates. Plus, his takes on sports are awful. He would be better off working a liberal station that focuses on politics, where he can just try to impress the audience with how evolved, woke and liberal he is.

It was funny when he made fun of you though.


When did that happen? What was said? I certainly had several differences of opinions with him. But I am most definitely the one laughing now.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group