It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:57 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
good dolphin wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
before the place fills up.



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


the last time they had a remote, every table was taken and people were standing full bus close to each other. You couldn't move around by 5 PM.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
He's covered himself with the inane belief that the MLB postseason is completely random. Spins at the wheel or whatever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:46 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Due to change in off periods at work, the only time I hear this show are the 5 to 10 minute drive from one school to practice at another. Has anyone asked him why for the Bulls it was "Only Championships Matter" but for the Cubs it is ok because they are a year early?

he really hasn't said that about the Cubs.


He tweeted it tonight.


Are the Mets winning at about the right time? They seem to be relying on 3 young pitchers with a lot of upside. Are they winning ahead of schedule? Is this different for pitchers?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:34 am
Posts: 583
pizza_Place: Great American
Yeah baseball's completely random in the post season, its not like they allow these guys a few games to sort anything out.

_________________
Dan Bernstein wrote:
This is Tao. Joe Maddon as Laozi.

Mac FM wrote:
Did somebody say grass?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
City of Fools wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
of all people Rod, you would understand the concept of house money. You would also be one of those with proper expectations for the Cubs that they then over exceeded.


They exceeded the expectations at the start of the season. But going into the play-offs they looked like they might be the best team.


actually they played their best baseball in the second half. But their pitching was such smoke and mirrors...their bullpen such a mess...an over reliance on power hitting from young players. It didn't add up for this season. It could have worked out like the 06 Cards, but even if they draw the Dodger and win, who's their Baumgardner against KC?


Their offense is going to strike out a ton, now or in the future, but perhaps they will show more patience (Game 1, they were swinging early in the count against Harvey). The starting rotation needs another legitimate top of the rotation starter. When Hendricks is getting the ball in Game 3, that's a problem.

Still, though, they were (or still are) facing a team with little post-season experience that is also depending on several younger players.

When you're a top 4 team, I hate to hear they are too young. The playoffs in baseball are a crap shoot. They still have to win their division next season to avoid that wildcard game, and that's already a tall order given the Pirates and Cardinals both should be strong again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
I don't think the third best team in the NL should be talking about the playoffs being random when they are losing to the fourth best team in the NL.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't think the third best team in the NL should be talking about the playoffs being random when they are losing to the fourth best team in the NL.

uh...because that proves the point?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't think the third best team in the NL should be talking about the playoffs being random when they are losing to the fourth best team in the NL.

uh...because that proves the point?
Are you telling me that the Pirates and Cardinals are better teams than both of these teams?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't think the third best team in the NL should be talking about the playoffs being random when they are losing to the fourth best team in the NL.

uh...because that proves the point?
Are you telling me that the Pirates and Cardinals are better teams than both of these teams?

The Cardinals lost their best pitcher a week before the playoffs. If they have him, then yes

And yes on the Pirates


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cardinals lost their best pitcher a week before the playoffs. If they have him, then yes

And yes on the Pirates
Got it. So the Cubs shouldn't even be playing now.

So, I'm not sure what the point is of bringing up that the playoffs are random.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cardinals lost their best pitcher a week before the playoffs. If they have him, then yes

And yes on the Pirates
Got it. So the Cubs shouldn't even be playing now.

So, I'm not sure what the point is of bringing up that the playoffs are random.

Because it's true?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Because it's true?
Got it.

Water is wet. Also true.

I'd understand the relevance if the Cubs were the best team in the NL but they aren't according to you guys.

Or, at least say "Team lucky to still be playing is now unlucky and likely won't be playing much longer".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cardinals lost their best pitcher a week before the playoffs. If they have him, then yes

And yes on the Pirates
Got it. So the Cubs shouldn't even be playing now.

So, I'm not sure what the point is of bringing up that the playoffs are random.

look, I understand playoff excitement, whatever, all that. But baseball should really be like the Premiership. The best team over 162 is the best team. Or have the NL champ play the AL champ. But the schedule is unbalanced.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:47 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79555
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Cardinals lost their best pitcher a week before the playoffs. If they have him, then yes

And yes on the Pirates
Got it. So the Cubs shouldn't even be playing now.

So, I'm not sure what the point is of bringing up that the playoffs are random.

look, I understand playoff excitement, whatever, all that. But baseball should really be like the Premiership. The best team over 162 is the best team. Or have the NL champ play the AL champ. But the schedule is unbalanced.


But that's one of the unique things about baseball. There's no real way to actually balance the schedule. Every team is different depending on which pitcher is starting that day. You can schedule the same amount of games between the teams but if Team A faces Arrieta five times and Team B only gets him once, that's not really "balanced".

The randomness is what makes it great. And I'll say this, the postseason is different than the 162. You could make a case that the Cubs had a better rotation than the Mets over the course of the year. But it's all different now. The spotlight is shining. You're the only game on the scoreboard. It's prime time.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Dan Bernstein:

Any team that does not win the world series, their season has been a failure.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
City of Fools wrote:
Dan Bernstein:

Any team that does not win the world series, their season has been a failure.


This is what a year early looks like, and what it looks like is a completely abysmal failure.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:21 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
City of Fools wrote:
Dan Bernstein:

Any team that does not win the world series, their season has been a failure.


I'm pretty positive that the Cubs did not consider the last 3 years, when they acquired all of these young players to compete for years to come, to be a failure.

Winning the WS, if you make the playoffs, is a crapshoot as well. It's pretty random.

That sounds great to make a statement like that, but it's a pretty stupid statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But that's one of the unique things about baseball. There's no real way to actually balance the schedule. Every team is different depending on which pitcher is starting that day. You can schedule the same amount of games between the teams but if Team A faces Arrieta five times and Team B only gets him once, that's not really "balanced".

The randomness is what makes it great. And I'll say this, the postseason is different than the 162. You could make a case that the Cubs had a better rotation than the Mets over the course of the year. But it's all different now. The spotlight is shining. You're the only game on the scoreboard. It's prime time.
The problem is that a lot of people overrate how impressive it is to win the most games in the regular season in all sports. The difference in wins between the Cardinals and Mets was 10 games, over an 162 game season. That is a difference of 6% of the total season(you know, the same difference that pretty much didn't matter with home field advantage) and yet somehow it is crazy to think the Mets aren't the best team?

I'd argue that the championship winner is actually more reflective of being the best team because everyone plays the same teams, or the teams that beat those teams, and that the goal is never to be the best team in April or May.

The playoffs being random is just a way to excuse poor play. Quite honestly, if you think that the sport you watch is decided by a completely random playoff then you shouldn't even watch it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
that the goal is never to be the best team in April or May.


I've found that to be the complete opposite in Milwaukee.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But that's one of the unique things about baseball. There's no real way to actually balance the schedule. Every team is different depending on which pitcher is starting that day. You can schedule the same amount of games between the teams but if Team A faces Arrieta five times and Team B only gets him once, that's not really "balanced".

The randomness is what makes it great. And I'll say this, the postseason is different than the 162. You could make a case that the Cubs had a better rotation than the Mets over the course of the year. But it's all different now. The spotlight is shining. You're the only game on the scoreboard. It's prime time.
The problem is that a lot of people overrate how impressive it is to win the most games in the regular season in all sports. The difference in wins between the Cardinals and Mets was 10 games, over an 162 game season. That is a difference of 6% of the total season(you know, the same difference that pretty much didn't matter with home field advantage) and yet somehow it is crazy to think the Mets aren't the best team?

I'd argue that the championship winner is actually more reflective of being the best team because everyone plays the same teams, or the teams that beat those teams, and that the goal is never to be the best team in April or May.

The playoffs being random is just a way to excuse poor play. Quite honestly, if you think that the sport you watch is decided by a completely random playoff then you shouldn't even watch it.

but that's part of what also makes it awesome...much like the first few rounds of the NCAA tourney.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
City of Fools wrote:
but that's part of what also makes it awesome...much like the first few rounds of the NCAA tourney.
The NCAA tournament isn't random.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
play 154 and play each NL or AL team 11 times. Don't play inter-league and have the NL champ and AL champ meet in an 11 game series.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
but that's part of what also makes it awesome...much like the first few rounds of the NCAA tourney.
The NCAA tournament isn't random.

uh? What? The first few rounds, outside of the #1 seeds against the #16 seeds, anything can happen.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
but that's part of what also makes it awesome...much like the first few rounds of the NCAA tourney.
The NCAA tournament isn't random.

uh? What? The first few rounds, outside of the #1 seeds against the #16 seeds, anything can happen.
It is not random. There are a ton of metrics that show it isn't.

Don't confuse upsets with randomness.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
but that's part of what also makes it awesome...much like the first few rounds of the NCAA tourney.
The NCAA tournament isn't random.

uh? What? The first few rounds, outside of the #1 seeds against the #16 seeds, anything can happen.
It is not random. There are a ton of metrics that show it isn't.

Don't confuse upsets with randomness.

:pirat: Arrr. I hate metrics.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2626
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Has there been comment on the Really Smart Guys who are allowing this to happen?

http://www.avclub.com/article/forget-hi ... rig-227229


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Can someone please tell me how you can say the playoffs are random and then say that the Cubs will win the World series?

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But that's one of the unique things about baseball. There's no real way to actually balance the schedule. Every team is different depending on which pitcher is starting that day. You can schedule the same amount of games between the teams but if Team A faces Arrieta five times and Team B only gets him once, that's not really "balanced".

The randomness is what makes it great. And I'll say this, the postseason is different than the 162. You could make a case that the Cubs had a better rotation than the Mets over the course of the year. But it's all different now. The spotlight is shining. You're the only game on the scoreboard. It's prime time.
The problem is that a lot of people overrate how impressive it is to win the most games in the regular season in all sports. The difference in wins between the Cardinals and Mets was 10 games, over an 162 game season. That is a difference of 6% of the total season(you know, the same difference that pretty much didn't matter with home field advantage) and yet somehow it is crazy to think the Mets aren't the best team?

The Mets are the best team right now. They werent over the course of the season.

The reason the randomness is more legit in baseball is the small sample size. The playoffs are 1/16th of a season.

NBA and NHL are like 40% and the NFL is about 20%


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
The Mets are the best team right now. They werent over the course of the season.
How do you know they weren't? The Cardinals won 10 more games than them, and the Cubs won 7. Is that enough for you to say that for certain?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
How can baseball be so heavily reliant on advanced metrics during the regular season -- it's been made quite clear that if you are not on board with advanced metrics you will be left in the dust as REALLY SMART PEOPLE march onward -- but in the playoffs advanced metrics mean nothing and everything is random?

How can advanced metrics suddenly become almost completely devalued at the most crucial time of the season when a champion is being crowned?

Why am I picturing Edward G. Robinson dressed in a Royals uniform bending Bernstein over a Gatorade cooler saying "Where are your advanced metrics noooow?"

Or do advanced metrics help you get to the playoffs and then everything is random?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group