It is currently Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:41 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 685 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 23  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2837
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
USA wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
The problem is that as consumed as he is by it, Dan doesn't actually have any interesting political thoughts. Republicans are very bad. Democrats are good. Bernie Sanders, not too great either. Liberal journalists are very, very good. How do you weave a show out of that? He'd make Pod Save America sound like Chapo Trap House.

He’s Moviebob Chapman. Just hates white people, particularly the white working class, to an almost insane & pathological degree. I dont think he really cares for blacks much either, or maybe that’s the fact that WSCR has bone-headedly been trying to force “Jew Boy & the Negro Minstrel Hour” ever since Terry Boers left through three different terrible lineup iterations.

In terms of actual ideology? He doesn’t have a lot. Pro illegal immigration is about the only thing he really believes in coherently. The rest is just rabid partisanship just for the sake of it.


it's not that he has uninteresting political thoughts, it's that "politics" has stretched into basic moral arguments, where something like the rights afforded to historically marginalized people is now considered a "political issue" where Republicans' outright bigotry (the kind of boring shit USA espouses regularly) is legitimized

so no, Dan wouldn't be a good political radio host. Maybe if it was regarding local politics.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2837
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Bernstein was going to call someone's employer because that person called him fat and a murderer of unborn pikes on X, formerly twitter? Or maybe even call that person's kids?


no

Edited: well actually yes, that is WHY he was going to call the employer. Which is, of course, ridiculously funny. But I don't think that's what he was going to tell the employer, he was going to mess with Greg by exposing Greg's social media personality


Last edited by Reared on the Score on Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2837
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even in 2020 what Greg did wouldn't get him in trouble. He never really crossed lines like Dan


Not in this argument over fish, no. But being a MAGA dipshit on Twitter (per CH's investigation) he's probably crossed a 2020 line


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:53 pm
Posts: 229
Location: Chicago
There have been some genuinely good and insightful comments in this thread as well as the requisite amount of meatballs, but it has all been interesting to consume. I made my feelings known earlier and only took minimal shrapnel so thanks for that. Carry on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:11 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57231
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
You know, when you look at his regular feed, it's just retweets of accounts called like "Patriot Report" and "The Freedom Conservative," but if you go over to the replies tab, ol' Greggers has been up Dan's ass for weeks now.

- He went after Dan for retweeting that the USDA is cutting school lunch budgets, retorting with "well, you retweeted Adam Kinzinger" (?) and then called him a libtard

- He responded to Dan posting the link to the OneStep poker event with "you're another dumb liberal, stick to sports"

- Went after Dan for working for Audacy, owned by (((Soros))), and accused Dan of getting a Rolex in high school (?)

Maybe he'd finally had enough of the guy.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12599
Curious Hair wrote:
BD wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
USA wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I think I said it before in the context of retirement/"early buyout," but when Dan is gone, he's gonna be gone gone. He's not gonna try to hustle some independent-contractor Substack gig, or start a podcast, or be a guest on other people's, or really resurface in any way for any sort of cobbled-together third act. He'll just disengage from talking about sports and fade away and that'll be it. I think I said at the time he'd just settle into some NFP sinecure where he'd get paid for being Dan Bernstein, but that appears to be off the table now.

Maybe he can do public relations for the Vernon Hills school district. Now there's a bit.

Distinct chance he goes CHGO. Not postulating or guessing, like they want him & he at least is listening. Backed up by my guy, one of their OG’s (who also had the hottest sister around growing up).

I don't know. He seems like he'd be disdainful of following the path that North and Mac took.


I think he lost interest in hosting a daily sports show on most days. Wouldn't his type of anger be welcomed on a progressive station? That's what he wants to talk about anyways....Maybe he can even find a station that lets him talk anything? I don't think he'd do a podcast, thinking more of radical left show where he can be comfortable??


The problem is that as consumed as he is by it, Dan doesn't actually have any interesting political thoughts. Republicans are very bad. Democrats are good. Bernie Sanders, not too great either. Liberal journalists are very, very good. How do you weave a show out of that? He'd make Pod Save America sound like Chapo Trap House.


Imagine Dan reading "thought" pieces on why socialism is what is needed, why price gouging is the true cause of egg-flation, etc. He's done this on his sports radio show. I think he would have plenty of topics to be angry about, just give him the space to do it vs. dropping these in on a sports show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:04 am
Posts: 609
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
As I said, esp with Chicago sports....this is more fun than actual Chicago sports. The Bulls? The Blackhawks? Another shitty Bears season, winning the offseason.
We should all thank Dan for the entertainment.

No, he won't be fired, as I said earlier, by Thursday of next week no one will be talking about this. Also, I agree with a lot of Bricks, but disagree on bad for people enjoying this or his mental health. The guy is an asshole, Always has been, he is not some nice, salt of the earth guy. He is a complete garbage human being. That said, he was extremely talented and witty back in the day and had amazing bits.

I get people saying if he is fired left with Milktoast radio.....it has been that way in Chicago for years.

Only exception was Parkins, but he went national.

the drama of a fisherman....thank you dan and twitter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:23 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57231
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
BD wrote:
Imagine Dan reading "thought" pieces on why socialism is what is needed

Pretty hard to imagine; I think even Elizabeth Warren was too radical for him.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13493
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
denisdman wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: all this over a fish.


Boobs, fish, his first name....the guy sure f's up on really minor things, although I recognize there is nothing minor about the boobs he messed up on.


Something is going on in his house. It seems like the whole group went off the deep end a couple of years ago.


If I had to guess, he lives in a very insular world where everyone thinks the same way. So he has trouble understanding or accepting that people have legitimate different views of the world. And with the world and social media so polarizing, he is always in defense mode. Goff had a lot of these traits as well.
That’s pretty much the whole politics section.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus. - Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Reared on the Score wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Bernstein was going to call someone's employer because that person called him fat and a murderer of unborn pikes on X, formerly twitter? Or maybe even call that person's kids?


no

Edited: well actually yes, that is WHY he was going to call the employer. Which is, of course, ridiculously funny. But I don't think that's what he was going to tell the employer, he was going to mess with Greg by exposing Greg's social media personality

I see it differently. Dan wasn't going to do anything other than threaten the guy with doxxing, because even he knows that posting the guy's address and what he could find out about him from Facebook would get him in big trouble, so he had to go with plausibly deniable threats. Except, the guy wasn't intimidated with the initial threat, and was unmoved by the threats about personal information—whether by naivete about what people do with such information or because he knows Dan's ilk are cowards, it doesn't really matter—and Dan was either too consumed by his anxious rage or too drunk from Lot 95 wine to realize escalating to "want your kids involved?" (whatever that actually meant) was likewise crossing a line.

It's likely very similar to what caused the dust-up with the Barstool guy filling in during transition: Dan was in the mood to settle someone's hash (Barstool then, MAGA Christian now [don't forget Dan HATES Christians]), and mustered up enough clenched-fist, visibly-shaking nerd rage to make a stand for all that is right and...did something completely embarrassing and possibly, in this case, career-ending. He's an awkward dork who has either bought into the rhetoric that the world is coming apart and he, personally, Must Do Something About All This, or has been so consumed by fear that everyone not in complete lockstep with him politically is waiting for a chance to gas people. Is there any doubt that things like being a more doting husband to his wife or a nurturing father to his children are afterthoughts in his therapy sessions, where he pays someone handsomely to plead with him to turn off MSNBC?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39074
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I see it differently. Dan wasn't going to do anything other than threaten the guy with doxxing, because even he knows that posting the guy's address and what he could find out about him from Facebook would get him in big trouble, so he had to go with plausibly deniable threats. Except, the guy wasn't intimidated with the initial threat, and was unmoved by the threats about personal information—whether by naivete about what people do with such information or because he knows Dan's ilk are cowards, it doesn't really matter—and Dan was either too consumed by his anxious rage or too drunk from Lot 95 wine to realize escalating to "want your kids involved?" (whatever that actually meant) was likewise crossing a line. ?

I’m guessing that was a bat signal to the real hardass dudes and Bernstein nut huggers like Schmutzie to Mobilize And Do Something like the actual doxxing , calling this guys work , etc . Didnt go quite as planned .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:35 pm 
Online

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2500
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
What happened to old Quad Cities Pat? Did he finally give up the computer?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
USA wrote:
What happened to old Quad Cities Pat? Did he finally give up the computer?

He appears to have a bluesky account, but you have to sign in to be able to see it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94216
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
You know, when you look at his regular feed, it's just retweets of accounts called like "Patriot Report" and "The Freedom Conservative," but if you go over to the replies tab, ol' Greggers has been up Dan's ass for weeks now.

- He went after Dan for retweeting that the USDA is cutting school lunch budgets, retorting with "well, you retweeted Adam Kinzinger" (?) and then called him a libtard

- He responded to Dan posting the link to the OneStep poker event with "you're another dumb liberal, stick to sports"

- Went after Dan for working for Audacy, owned by (((Soros))), and accused Dan of getting a Rolex in high school (?)

Maybe he'd finally had enough of the guy.

Denis wrote:
But his MAGA comment shows his intolerance.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33530
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Brick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
You know, when you look at his regular feed, it's just retweets of accounts called like "Patriot Report" and "The Freedom Conservative," but if you go over to the replies tab, ol' Greggers has been up Dan's ass for weeks now.

- He went after Dan for retweeting that the USDA is cutting school lunch budgets, retorting with "well, you retweeted Adam Kinzinger" (?) and then called him a libtard

- He responded to Dan posting the link to the OneStep poker event with "you're another dumb liberal, stick to sports"

- Went after Dan for working for Audacy, owned by (((Soros))), and accused Dan of getting a Rolex in high school (?)

Maybe he'd finally had enough of the guy.

Denis wrote:
But his MAGA comment shows his intolerance.


The minions doing fine work. Portnoy wins again.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26061
pizza_Place: Pizanos
good dolphin wrote:
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
WSCR without Dan Bernstein is basically a wasteland. Rahimi & Harris are both out-of-towners and the afternoon show is just pure, unadulterated cringe. I know Dan is a dweeb but man he is like the ONE person they have who really understands the mindset of the Chicago fan. He doesn’t starfuck athletes or coaches, and he knows exactly when to indulge delusion and bring out the torches & pitchforks.

I actually think the station might not last the year without him.

He saves his starfucking for the front office.

Since Theo left not really. He’s brutal on the Bears, even with the Ben Johnson thing you can tell he’s still a big skeptic.


hmmm...I wonder what itis about them personally that is a theme over dan's entire career

He’s willing to break bad on a co-religionist.

Look what he did to that pregnant fish.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Dan was able to dissociate during the onslaught from the Stoolies, so I don't buy that this one rando Boomer was able to crack the code and make Dan do something he's never done before and go ballistic on a troll.

Regardless, the guy's previous trolls were pretty tame by internet standards, hell they were lame by Bernstein's standard trolling shtick where he calls people dumb, inbred hicks. So the response was neither deserved nor warranted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33530
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Dan was smart enough to know they were coming for him. But he was dumb enough to fall into the traps Barstool laid.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
denisdman wrote:
Dan was smart enough to know they were coming for him. But he was dumb enough to fall into the traps Barstool laid.

The only traps the Stoolies like are hairless twinks in lingerie.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Posts: 2837
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Reared on the Score wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Bernstein was going to call someone's employer because that person called him fat and a murderer of unborn pikes on X, formerly twitter? Or maybe even call that person's kids?


no

Edited: well actually yes, that is WHY he was going to call the employer. Which is, of course, ridiculously funny. But I don't think that's what he was going to tell the employer, he was going to mess with Greg by exposing Greg's social media personality

I see it differently. Dan wasn't going to do anything other than threaten the guy with doxxing, because even he knows that posting the guy's address and what he could find out about him from Facebook would get him in big trouble, so he had to go with plausibly deniable threats. Except, the guy wasn't intimidated with the initial threat, and was unmoved by the threats about personal information—whether by naivete about what people do with such information or because he knows Dan's ilk are cowards, it doesn't really matter—and Dan was either too consumed by his anxious rage or too drunk from Lot 95 wine to realize escalating to "want your kids involved?" (whatever that actually meant) was likewise crossing a line.

It's likely very similar to what caused the dust-up with the Barstool guy filling in during transition: Dan was in the mood to settle someone's hash (Barstool then, MAGA Christian now [don't forget Dan HATES Christians]), and mustered up enough clenched-fist, visibly-shaking nerd rage to make a stand for all that is right and...did something completely embarrassing and possibly, in this case, career-ending. He's an awkward dork who has either bought into the rhetoric that the world is coming apart and he, personally, Must Do Something About All This, or has been so consumed by fear that everyone not in complete lockstep with him politically is waiting for a chance to gas people. Is there any doubt that things like being a more doting husband to his wife or a nurturing father to his children are afterthoughts in his therapy sessions, where he pays someone handsomely to plead with him to turn off MSNBC?


I mostly agree, except to add that Dan's threat didn't work because the shitheads won. This tactic is #resistance from the last war.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26061
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Also, point of order here on the fish…

The argument wasn’t about the merits of killing a pregnant pike. Dan insisted it was a walleye and got a “well ackshully” from the MAGA guy. That set Bernstein off, I think, because Bernstein has always been very emotional when proven factually wrong.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
USA wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
USA wrote:
WSCR without Dan Bernstein is basically a wasteland. Rahimi & Harris are both out-of-towners and the afternoon show is just pure, unadulterated cringe. I know Dan is a dweeb but man he is like the ONE person they have who really understands the mindset of the Chicago fan. He doesn’t starfuck athletes or coaches, and he knows exactly when to indulge delusion and bring out the torches & pitchforks.

I actually think the station might not last the year without him.

He saves his starfucking for the front office.

Since Theo left not really. He’s brutal on the Bears, even with the Ben Johnson thing you can tell he’s still a big skeptic.


hmmm...I wonder what itis about them personally that is a theme over dan's entire career

He’s willing to break bad on a co-religionist.

Look what he did to that pregnant fish.

Dan LOVES Smart People who are only there to do two things: chew bubble gum, and shift some goddamn paradigms. I doubt being a fellow member of the tribe is much more than a bonus to him. He loved the heterosexual, non-Jewish Billy Beane and Paul DePodesta (I don't know if Paul DePodesta is heterosexual).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:18 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57231
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Also, point of order here on the fish…

The argument wasn’t about the merits of killing a pregnant pike. Dan insisted it was a walleye and got a “well ackshully” from the MAGA guy. That set Bernstein off, I think, because Bernstein has always been very emotional when proven factually wrong.


I feel like he's in a place where "hey, that thing you care about, you actually fucked up at" is cutting deeper than usual.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 31002
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Brick wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
orioleboy wrote:
Camp One Step should have had his back. Say what you will about Dan but it cannot be denied that he helped them raise thousands of dollars for the kids they serve. And sure he mentioned it a lot on the air but he generated donations to a very important cause. He was totally invested in it. And in return, they jettison him quickly for a mistake on X. I do not endorse what Dan did but he deserved better from a charity to which he gave so much effort and dedication.

If he believes that much in the charity, he can still be a great influence on it.

The charity that fired him over a tweet?

The charity has made their position clear. Is he just supposed to keep working for them?

He can choose to if he likes, they also have the right to fire his ass. What a country!!!!


I guess you'll find out if he really is that into the charity or maybe just like being on the Board of Directors.

Amazing thought, can you discuss this with Brick?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66205
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
hnd wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Has Mac commented on whether the fish was likely dead or not? Even the outdoors "expert" at Barstool claimed the coagulated blood suggested the fish was dead.


there are 2 realities to keep in mind :

1. bleeding gills is not a death knell for a fish. it happens, and fish can recover just fine.
2. Northern pike are largely an unwanted game fish. they are prolific breeders and without culling can take over a body of water. Out of water they are slimy and stinks like ass and are tricky to clean. I've never met a person who complained about the possible demise of a northern pike. Muskies.....a totally different animal....literally and figuratively.

1. Take a closer look at the blood on the gills.

2. Who cares? It's not about the fish it's about the psychotic response to criticism. He went all John Cena because some .oron on the interwebs taunted him. This, and the barstool guy thing, is a massive ego problem.

3. It's all hilarious.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:20 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57231
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Blood on the Gills is my favorite Trey Anastasio comeback album.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Also, point of order here on the fish…

The argument wasn’t about the merits of killing a pregnant pike. Dan insisted it was a walleye and got a “well ackshully” from the MAGA guy. That set Bernstein off, I think, because Bernstein has always been very emotional when proven factually wrong.

Technically Mr. Messenger was well ackshually-ing "Betsy4Democracy" who brought up walleye in response to someone asking Dan directly whether he was going to eat the possibly-Jewish, possibly-dead pike in Dan's picture.

Image

Dan seemed to be really upset that he was accused of killing a pregnant pike.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33530
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Dan was smart enough to know they were coming for him. But he was dumb enough to fall into the traps Barstool laid.

The only traps the Stoolies like are hairless twinks in lingerie.


A lot of resources were activated. Some assumed Bernstein had outlasted Portnoy’s minions. They play the long game. They won.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23818
pizza_Place: Giordano's
And now that I read that back, "released successfully" seems like a lawyered response Dan is capable of. And tacking on "...took off like a torpedo" is protesting a bit much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Drunk Tweeting?
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12599
Darkside wrote:
hnd wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Has Mac commented on whether the fish was likely dead or not? Even the outdoors "expert" at Barstool claimed the coagulated blood suggested the fish was dead.


there are 2 realities to keep in mind :

1. bleeding gills is not a death knell for a fish. it happens, and fish can recover just fine.
2. Northern pike are largely an unwanted game fish. they are prolific breeders and without culling can take over a body of water. Out of water they are slimy and stinks like ass and are tricky to clean. I've never met a person who complained about the possible demise of a northern pike. Muskies.....a totally different animal....literally and figuratively.

1. Take a closer look at the blood on the gills.

2. Who cares? It's not about the fish it's about the psychotic response to criticism. He went all John Cena because some .oron on the interwebs taunted him. This, and the barstool guy thing, is a massive ego problem.

3. It's all hilarious.


Did the barstool guy criticism him or just say his last name? I think it's highly probable Dan didn't like him because that guy worked for barstool, a site that he hates because of their positions, so he went in looking for a fight and settled on the dumbest thing he could use (.....he then probably "trumped" it with a fish argument).

I think he's just triggered very easily by the slightest thins that offend/outrage him - Trump, anyone who supports him, etc. to the point that he's looking for reasons.

Even though his co-hosts all share his general thoughts, I can't imagine having to work with someone who is so miserable day after day.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 685 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group