billypootons wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
spiegs offered zero evidence of wrong-doing. not much of an evisceration, more of a hissy fit.
This same unnamed source "reporting" led to Bernstein on air insinuating Kris Bryant was partying too much.
So that's an example of how this goes wrong.
The damning part of Spiegs' rant was his (true) assertion that Dan's "sources" are a "bit" he does so he can have programming for his show and tease listeners into the next segment. He then made a remark about "say things you can't be called out on", which I think further reinforces the idea that Dan's "sources", if not made up entirely, are nebulous enough that they allow Dan to speak through them and make insinuations that he otherwise would be taken to task for, whether informally or formally via lawsuit (Bryant's partying, pincushion, wife-fucking, etc.).
Dan also likes to question the integrity of other people in the media which is laughable when you consider he apparently lies about sources and the information "they" provide him.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
