It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:30 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 234 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
I'm not saying that there are HOF guys out there screwed over. I never said that. But Quintana is a prime example. Why do people want to look at his W/L as some sort of barometer (it's pronounced thermometer) of success? He played for awful teams and had incredibly low run support. Had he pitched on a winning club, he'd have a string of 17-6 seasons, not 11-11 seasons.


So he couldn't overcome the high-stress environment of knowing that he had to be his best to win.

That doesn't sound like a stud pitcher. It sounds like a nice #3.

There's no evidence to support that.

As opposed to the evidence he'd have a 17-6 record if he pitched for a
winning team?


Historical evidence suggests that if he just played for a better offensive team, his W/L% would increase, yes.


Isn't that true of everyone? If the team scored more runs then the pitcher would have a better chance of winning the game.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
Looking at wins and losses to evaluate a player is extremely simplistic. It's fine at the end of a career because it's such a large sample size. But GM's would be dumb to use it as an indicator of future performance. There are better indicators.



Like the indicators everyone used to trade for Samardzija when his W/L record showed you who he really was?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
ChiefWampum wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
I'm not saying that there are HOF guys out there screwed over. I never said that. But Quintana is a prime example. Why do people want to look at his W/L as some sort of barometer (it's pronounced thermometer) of success? He played for awful teams and had incredibly low run support. Had he pitched on a winning club, he'd have a string of 17-6 seasons, not 11-11 seasons.


So he couldn't overcome the high-stress environment of knowing that he had to be his best to win.

That doesn't sound like a stud pitcher. It sounds like a nice #3.

There's no evidence to support that.


Sure I do.

He won 48% of his games with the Sox.[/quote] While at the same time, Chris Sale was winning over 60% of his games with the Sox...as JOrr correctly pointed out a few days ago.

When evaluating a player, looking at only one stat is just as foolish as completely ignoring a so-called antiquated stat like W-L or RBI.[/quote]




He's not Sale numbnuts, nobody said he was.. Jorr goes to the hof comparison and you go to Sale(future hof)

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38690
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Wins is the original made up stat. It tells you absolutely nothing about how a pitcher performed in a game.



It tells you the most important thing- if he pitched better or worse than the guy(s) he faced.

Not necessarily true. Bullpens blow leads, errors lead to extended innings, no run support = much lower likelihood of winning.


If you leave the game with the lead and nobody on you can't lose. If you're really a top pitcher (and in today's game you aren't really expected to go more than 6 innings) you should be leaving the game with the lead a great majority of the time.

That's just as easily countered with games they were on the hook for a loss and the team ended up at least tying the game . Those even out for the most part

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
ChiefWampum wrote:
I'm not saying that there are HOF guys out there screwed over. I never said that. But Quintana is a prime example. Why do people want to look at his W/L as some sort of barometer (it's pronounced thermometer) of success? He played for awful teams and had incredibly low run support. Had he pitched on a winning club, he'd have a string of 17-6 seasons, not 11-11 seasons.


So he couldn't overcome the high-stress environment of knowing that he had to be his best to win.

That doesn't sound like a stud pitcher. It sounds like a nice #3.

There's no evidence to support that.

As opposed to the evidence he'd have a 17-6 record if he pitched for a
winning team?


Historical evidence suggests that if he just played for a better offensive team, his W/L% would increase, yes.



Unfortunately, Jose Quintana- just like every other pitcher- has to pitch the actual games he is in rather than other theoretical games where his team is scoring runs by the dozen.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Looking at wins and losses to evaluate a player is extremely simplistic. It's fine at the end of a career because it's such a large sample size. But GM's would be dumb to use it as an indicator of future performance. There are better indicators.



Like the indicators everyone used to trade for Samardzija when his W/L record showed you who he really was?



Another horse shit comparison, The guppy had a 4 era in the NL, Quintana will be significantly lower in the NL, The guppy was 5 in the AL, what's Q @ ? 3.6 in the AL.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Quintana got 2 runs or less in 55% of his Sox starts, that's abysmal.. You'd have to be Sale or Bob Gibson to make that look decent... He's a good 3 pitcher, he's not a hall of famer.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Looking at wins and losses to evaluate a player is extremely simplistic. It's fine at the end of a career because it's such a large sample size. But GM's would be dumb to use it as an indicator of future performance. There are better indicators.



Like the indicators everyone used to trade for Samardzija when his W/L record showed you who he really was?



Another horse shit comparison, The guppy had a 4 era in the NL, Quintana will be significantly lower in the NL, The guppy was 5 in the AL, what's Q @ ? 3.6 in the AL.



Sham ran the second fastest Kentucky Derby ever. Do you believe he was the second best horse ever to run in the Derby?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
2017-4.6
2016-4.0
2015-3.6
2014-4.1

That is the run support avg for Quintana. I would hope that given 4 runs a game is good enough for such a great pitcher.

Here is a guy that I never hear talked about like Quintana is... Good ol' Lance Lynn.

2015 run support of 3.3, finished 12-11. 2014 run support of 4.1, finished 15-10. How did he manage to be a winning pitcher when Quintana wasn't?

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Keyser Soze wrote:
Wins is the original made up stat. It tells you absolutely nothing about how a pitcher permformed in a game.
A Keith Law dicksucker talking bad about made up stats.

Cats & dogs living together, mass hysteria!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
2017-4.6
2016-4.0
2015-3.6
2014-4.1

That is the run support avg for Quintana. I would hope that given 4 runs a game is good enough for such a great pitcher.

Here is a guy that I never hear talked about like Quintana is... Good ol' Lance Lynn.

2015 run support of 3.3, finished 12-11. 2014 run support of 4.1, finished 15-10. How did he manage to be a winning pitcher when Quintana wasn't?

Hank, perhaps, but so far, so good.

Lynn's a good pitcher, and a righty.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
formerlyknownas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
2017-4.6
2016-4.0
2015-3.6
2014-4.1

That is the run support avg for Quintana. I would hope that given 4 runs a game is good enough for such a great pitcher.

Here is a guy that I never hear talked about like Quintana is... Good ol' Lance Lynn.

2015 run support of 3.3, finished 12-11. 2014 run support of 4.1, finished 15-10. How did he manage to be a winning pitcher when Quintana wasn't?

Hank, perhaps, but so far, so good.

Lynn's a good pitcher, and a righty.


Yeah, Lynn is fine but I don't hear people gushing over him like I do for Quintana. Maybe I'm wrong and the Cardinal contingent on the board will be along to correct me, I don't consume a ton of national baseball talk.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Lack of run support can fuck up a pitcher for a season. Maybe a season and a half. If it goes on longer than that, its likely the pitcher himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38690
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Can't wait for the HOF to put a .500 pitcher in next to Tom Seaver because his WAR and WHiP were so good.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
badrogue17 wrote:
Can't wait for the HOF to put a .500 pitcher in next to Tom Seaver because his WAR and WHiP were so good.




Nobody is suggesting he's a hof pitcher, how many other guys in the AL have an era below 3.5 in a hitters park and are 50-54 ?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
Can't wait for the HOF to put a .500 pitcher in next to Tom Seaver because his WAR and WHiP were so good.



Murry Dickson and Joe Horlen are probably the best starting pitchers you can find with losing career records. Horlen was a game under .500. I would consider him a good comp for Quintana. He was a fine pitcher but all those numbers he piled up pitching in Sox Park make him seem better than he was. And his sparkling peripherals aren't unrelated to the fact that he lacked "run support".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Can't wait for the HOF to put a .500 pitcher in next to Tom Seaver because his WAR and WHiP were so good.




Nobody is suggesting he's a hof pitcher, how many other guys in the AL have an era below 3.5 in a hitters park and are 50-54 ?


Aren't the guys who are allowing less than Quintana in the games he pitches pitching in the same ballparks?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22457
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
2017-4.6
2016-4.0
2015-3.6
2014-4.1

That is the run support avg for Quintana. I would hope that given 4 runs a game is good enough for such a great pitcher.

Here is a guy that I never hear talked about like Quintana is... Good ol' Lance Lynn.

2015 run support of 3.3, finished 12-11. 2014 run support of 4.1, finished 15-10. How did he manage to be a winning pitcher when Quintana wasn't?


Right, that's the per 9 innings rate, not the amount of runs they actually gave to Quintana while he was in the game. What good is a run in the 9th for Quintana when he left in the 7th?

For his Sox career, Quintana started 169 games and received a total of 467 runs of offense from the Sox while in the game. That comes out to 2.76 runs per start. Here is the distribution of actual runs scored for every start with the Sox:

Image

As you can see, Quintana was way more likely to get 2 runs or less in any given start, such games comprising 96 starts, or 57% of his career with the White Sox. He got 1 run or less in nearly 40% of the starts he made.

Comparatively, Chris Sale for his career got 3.57 runs per start from the Sox. And the year he finished 4th in the Cy Young voting despite a 13-11 record in 2015, Sale got 3.19 runs of support per start. Here is his actual run support per start distribution:

Image

He got 2 runs or less a total of 70 times in his career, or 47% of his starts. Sale got 1 run or less in 32% of his starts.


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Good stuff Juice.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:52 pm
Posts: 516
pizza_Place: Barraco's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Can't wait for the HOF to put a .500 pitcher in next to Tom Seaver because his WAR and WHiP were so good.




Nobody is suggesting he's a hof pitcher, how many other guys in the AL have an era below 3.5 in a hitters park and are 50-54 ?


Aren't the guys who are allowing less than Quintana in the games he pitches pitching in the same ballparks?

You're assuming the starting pitchers he's going against are allowing fewer runs in all 54 of those losses.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:52 pm
Posts: 516
pizza_Place: Barraco's
JLN is packing heat. Love it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22457
pizza_Place: Giordano's
To put the above in context, over the last 3 seasons, the league-average starter got 3.04 runs of support per start.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
To put the above in context, over the last 3 seasons, the league-average starter got 3.04 runs of support per start.


Wait league avg is 3.04 and he's gotten 2.76? So the difference is a quarter of a run (or nothing since that doesn't exist). At the very least, he should be a .500 pitcher. If he's that good he should be ABOVE AVERAGE. He isn't because hes just another guy with good SABR stats that chart making guys like to jerk off about.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Just to confirm, hes a great pitcher (not HOF but hall of very good) and has just been the most unlucky sap in all of baseball history. He's going to win 30 games a year for the Cubs now!!!

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22457
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
To put the above in context, over the last 3 seasons, the league-average starter got 3.04 runs of support per start.


Wait league avg is 3.04 and he's gotten 2.76? So the difference is a quarter of a run (or nothing since that doesn't exist). At the very least, he should be a .500 pitcher. If he's that good he should be ABOVE AVERAGE. He isn't because hes just another guy with good SABR stats that chart making guys like to jerk off about.


Not really, the average I gave isn't weighted. As I showed via the charts, a guy can "average" nearly 2.76 runs of support a game, but still get 2 runs or less in 57% of his starts. There is a vast difference in expected value between 2.76 R/G and 3.04, because the smallest resolution is 1 run.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Hank gets it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38690
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Hank gets it.

I'm willing to bet it's a lot less since the twins came along .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Hank gets it.


I want to be wrong. I want JLN to bump this thread in October and call me a dumbass.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22457
pizza_Place: Giordano's
There have been 67 starters since 2012 to throw at least 750 innings. Quintana is 64th in per start Run Support.

Here are the top 5:

Max Scherzer (3.96)
David Price (3.95)
CJ Wilson (3.83)
Clayton Kershaw (3.68)
Adam Wainwright (3.65)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Hank gets it.


I want to be wrong. I want JLN to bump this thread in October and call me a dumbass.


I know.

I felt the same way. Eventually you come to realize he isn't some elite pitcher. He's ok.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 234 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group