I wouldn't want you fired either.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Don’t use Trump to make Bernsie a victim.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

Dont forget Dan said something mean about Ron Santo 20 years ago.

_________________

Nope, this is where the dislike for the man overcomes the fear of being a hypocrite.

Why would anyone take yours seriously. You're clearly a bernstein superfan, right?

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Hey Brick,

Quote my post above and take a look at the three consecutive "[/quote]s." I tried to remove two of them several times and they keep being reinserted. Weird.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

JORR, not only is LibsOfTikTok not actually on TikTok, you've reposted LibsOfTikTok tweets on numerous occasions. And I'm not even against LibsOfTikTok.

_________________

JORRs fixed quotes:


No. I've never even downloaded TikTok. And I'm not sure what Libs of TikTok has to do with bernstein killing fish and threatening people's children.



Why would anyone take yours seriously. You're clearly a bernstein superfan, right?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

I know what Libs of Tik Tok is. And I'm sure I've posted her tweets occasionally. I had no idea she wasn't on Tik Tok. I assumed that's where the account originated.

Whatever, I'm hardly a "super fan." As far as I know, she simply reposts stupid shit others put on the Internet.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

If "you want your kids involved?" was not a threat, why mention the man's kids then? What was he doing with that if not threatening? That coupled with the other veiled threats pretty much set the context.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

It was also beneath the picture of the pregnant fish he’d recently murdered.

_________________

I have pointed this out and clearly Brick doesn’t want to discuss this point, because either he has me on ignore or knows the obvious.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins

Brick is just moving needles here god bless him. He's basically Jimmy Hart.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

How do we know the guy’s kids are adults? Plenty of older dudes having kids and/or adopting them. The 60ish couple across the street from me have two adopted grade school girls from China.

If you don’t assume Greg’s kids are adults, Dan’s comments are more ominous. And maybe there’s a pic of the kids out there, but I’m not going to look for it.

I've already said if we are getting technical it was a meaningless threat.

Like "Do you want me to block you?" is a meaningless threat but it can still be a threat.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

I preferred the dude with the tennis racket. Jimmy Cornette

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins

Listen, this guy used his real name on social media, alright? So anyone could EASILY find out where he lived, his current and past phone numbers, his work history, his family tree, etc. And since none of them probably thought to use a pseudonym for their internet profiles, anyone could EASILY find this PUBLIC information and...err...promise to involve them if conditions aren't meant.

But that's not doxxing and it's not illegal show me the law.

Anytime people on this bored post about being manly men (who would never stoop so low as to engage in petty squabbling like the fairer sex), I will recall that there were two separate multi-page threads litigating the issue of a Dan Bernstein Twitter beef.

_________________

He should've mentioned the wife, she's in the Twitter profile photo

But Dan maybe had a spasm of reason assuming a MAGA chud likely hates his own wife so that wouldn't be a detterent

Ok.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

I suppose retweets don't equal endorsements and not making you superfan.

Well in case you're legitimately ignorant and not faking it, I mention them because that reposting of public information has caused threats to children, and on a legitimately serious level not Bernstein fishdick level. Whether they're directly causing it is up for debate, but by your definition they are threats

Hypothetical: the Messenger kid is trans

I would have to think Messenger’s kids already know the type of person he is. Just look at his Twitter account, he’s not trying to hide anything.

If it were 2009, the Score would do a Barack Obama Beer Summit where Senor and The Mess go fishing together and work out their problems. But now that the power of crybullying has been handed from liberals to conservatives (charitably speaking), blood must spill from more than just gills.

_________________

They'd likely stick up for him, the liberal mob has lost its juice but getting one of six vehicles in the will is forever (or at least a few years)

Are you talking about when LoTT reported that some hospital was doing some procedure and the hospital claimed they received a bomb threat?

If so, I think you need another crash course in what "doxxing" is and isn't. "Doxxing" is posting personally identifiable information, which while technically "publicly available", isn't necessarily readily available or known. "Doxxing" is not saying the name of a well-known entity like a hospital. Saying "McDonald's chicken isn't really chicken" isn't "doxxing" McDonald's.

Criticize LoTT for their journalistic acumen, and there's plenty of meat on that bone for sure, but stating, even incorrectly, that "Boston Children's Hospital is offering this procedure to minors" isn't "doxxing" anyone or anything.

Let them fight, there is absolutely nothing going out over the Score airwaves that is better than a good ol fashioned twitter fight. Seeing Bernstein's latent personality spring into life was great and right up until the kids comment, Greg six cars seemed to be up for it.

_________________

JORR doesn't care about the exact definition of doxxing either, though I legit learned more about that today. We're Talking what makes a "threat", in that they aren't directly saying to harm but know there's an army of psychos they're riling up

(different question as to why Dan would think he had similar power)

As a proud suburbanite I have respect for a 6 car man. One for each day. The last day for the Lord.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

he said he owns "six vehicles". i'm going to guess at least one of them is a riding lawnmower.