It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:30 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » DAN OR BERNSIE (DON'T CALL HIM BERNSTEIN) & WHOEVER

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
WaitingforRuffcorn
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Quote:
“Those are legal issues. That’s not our purview … We wish him well.”

Paxson should have stopped before that last remark, considering that the LAPD is trying to find out if a violent crime was committed by Rose and his friends against another human being who’s now fighting for justice.

We may never know what exactly happened the night of the incident, but as long as so many possibilities remain open, it’s best for all involved to balance concern much more mindfully until and after there’s resolution of some kind.

There’s no reason to wish a rapist well, and Derrick Rose might be one.


Yeah. Don't wish him well. He "might" be a rapist. No projecting there at all.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/09/28/ ... tent=10093

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.
Top
 Profile  
 
formerlyknownas
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3717
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
“Those are legal issues. That’s not our purview … We wish him well.”

Paxson should have stopped before that last remark, considering that the LAPD is trying to find out if a violent crime was committed by Rose and his friends against another human being who’s now fighting for justice.

We may never know what exactly happened the night of the incident, but as long as so many possibilities remain open, it’s best for all involved to balance concern much more mindfully until and after there’s resolution of some kind.

There’s no reason to wish a rapist well, and Derrick Rose might be one.


Yeah. Don't wish him well. He "might" be a rapist. No projecting there at all.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/09/28/ ... tent=10093

This is why you need multiple voices.....doesn't he have an editor?

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid
Top
 Profile  
 
billypootons
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
formerlyknownas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
“Those are legal issues. That’s not our purview … We wish him well.”

Paxson should have stopped before that last remark, considering that the LAPD is trying to find out if a violent crime was committed by Rose and his friends against another human being who’s now fighting for justice.

We may never know what exactly happened the night of the incident, but as long as so many possibilities remain open, it’s best for all involved to balance concern much more mindfully until and after there’s resolution of some kind.

There’s no reason to wish a rapist well, and Derrick Rose might be one.


Yeah. Don't wish him well. He "might" be a rapist. No projecting there at all.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2016/09/28/ ... tent=10093

This is why you need multiple voices.....doesn't he have an editor?



did JDC write this for him? it's 4 times the length of his usual "columns"
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
That is not justice, your daughter is still alive

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
Godfella
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:18 pm
Posts: 4865
pizza_Place: Luigi's
Why did you go to the police? Why didn't you come to me first

_________________
"This is Chicago, my friend. Anything can happen."
Top
 Profile  
 
Hussra
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Quote:
The disclosures under oath were indeed damning enough to get the renewed attention of the LAPD in a case still well within the statute of limitations. Julie DiCaro of 670 The Score in Chicago reported via Twitter that a member of the accuser’s legal team confirmed that Rose’s deposition resulted in investigators being “not at all happy” with the facts that emerged.


We had this conversation a month ago re: Rose talking too much during civil discovery. Rose's lawyers done fucked up:

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=102086

Hussra wrote:
Pretty sure your right to invoke your 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to/supersedes civil proceedings and civil discovery. Regardless of whether or not there's an extant criminal proceeding against D-Rose with this particular plaintiff, most of his answers should've been:

"Based on the advice of counsel, I assert my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States
Constitution and respectfully decline to answer the question."

other than basic fact questions and likely financial discovery questions. anything about the night in question or D-Rose's relationship with this particular plaintiff? 5th amendment.
Top
 Profile  
 
Juice's Lecture Notes
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22507
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Hussra wrote:
Quote:
The disclosures under oath were indeed damning enough to get the renewed attention of the LAPD in a case still well within the statute of limitations. Julie DiCaro of 670 The Score in Chicago reported via Twitter that a member of the accuser’s legal team confirmed that Rose’s deposition resulted in investigators being “not at all happy” with the facts that emerged.


We had this conversation a month ago re: Rose talking too much during civil discovery. Rose's lawyers done fucked up:

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=102086

Hussra wrote:
Pretty sure your right to invoke your 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to/supersedes civil proceedings and civil discovery. Regardless of whether or not there's an extant criminal proceeding against D-Rose with this particular plaintiff, most of his answers should've been:

"Based on the advice of counsel, I assert my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United States
Constitution and respectfully decline to answer the question."

other than basic fact questions and likely financial discovery questions. anything about the night in question or D-Rose's relationship with this particular plaintiff? 5th amendment.


However, can't invocation of the Fifth during civil proceedings be used by the jury to infer culpability, unlike in a criminal proceeding? Of course the upside is, here you only lose a couple million of your hundreds of millions of dollars, as opposed to your liberty.
Top
 Profile  
 
Hussra
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
dunno, prolly depends on how good Rose's lawyer is at arguing against it vs the other side's lawyers arguing the other way.

but if Rose doesn't say anything, sounds like the police either didn't want to or didn't have enough to go forward with a criminal complaint.

like NAS noted in the previous thread, no way that civil case should've been at the point where Rose is giving sworn testimony in the first place:

NAS wrote:
For the life of me I can't understand how his brother or someone else didn't give this woman the $25k to make it go away. He has a lot of idiots around him.


the idiot-appellation also applies to whatever lawyers Rose has handling this case. your lawyer, if you're already in trouble, is supposed to at a bare-minimum not make the situation worse; and definitely not let you do or say anything to make it worse.
Top
 Profile  
 
Chus
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Godfella wrote:
Why did you go to the police? Why didn't you come to me first


Then take the justice from the judge, the bitter with the sweet, Bonasera. But if you come to me with your friendship, your loyalty, then your enemies become my enemies, and then, believe me, they would fear you...

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way
Top
 Profile  
 
Franky T
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9960
pizza_Place: world famous
Using the phrase "fighting for justice" necessarily assumes a wrongful act. That phrase has always bothered me. You can't say that without assuming guilt.

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 

Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » DAN OR BERNSIE (DON'T CALL HIM BERNSTEIN) & WHOEVER

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group