I like your style, but which question are you answering?
Edit: ok fast edit my bad
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=102636 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Jbi11s [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
... The guy Bernstein couldn't wait for the White Sox to get rid of because according to his research although Gillaspie was an above average hitter you needed more power as a 3rd baseman? I'm not imaginary radioing that am I? |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
Jbi11s wrote: ... The guy Bernstein couldn't wait for the White Sox to get rid of because according to his research although Gillaspie was an above average hitter you needed more power as a 3rd baseman? I'm not imaginary radioing that am I? No. I'm pretty sure you're correct. |
|
| Author: | Jbi11s [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
| I like your style, but which question are you answering? Edit: ok fast edit my bad |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
Jbi11s wrote: ... The guy Bernstein couldn't wait for the White Sox to get rid of because according to his research although Gillaspie was an above average hitter you needed more power as a 3rd baseman? I'm not imaginary radioing that am I? Bernsie is always right until he isn't. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
Penisery aside, Dan isn't really wrong. A couple big (sorry, you can't define "big" hits) postseason hits doesn't make his mostly sub-par career stats any better. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
redskingreg wrote: Penisery aside, Dan isn't really wrong. A couple big (sorry, you can't define "big" hits) postseason hits doesn't make his mostly sub-par career stats any better. You're getting dangerously close to arguing small sample size here, greg. |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
Jbi11s wrote: :lol: I like your style, but which question are you answering? Edit: ok fast edit my bad Yeah, I thought about it for a second after I hit submit. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
leashyourkids wrote: redskingreg wrote: Penisery aside, Dan isn't really wrong. A couple big (sorry, you can't define "big" hits) postseason hits doesn't make his mostly sub-par career stats any better. You're getting dangerously close to arguing small sample size here, greg. SHOW ME WHERE I REFERENCED SAMPLE SIZE. SHOW ME E(clap)X(clap)A(clap)C(clap)T(clap)L(clap)Y WHERE I SAID THAT. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
redskingreg wrote: leashyourkids wrote: redskingreg wrote: Penisery aside, Dan isn't really wrong. A couple big (sorry, you can't define "big" hits) postseason hits doesn't make his mostly sub-par career stats any better. You're getting dangerously close to arguing small sample size here, greg. SHOW ME WHERE I REFERENCED SAMPLE SIZE. SHOW ME E(clap)X(clap)A(clap)C(clap)T(clap)L(clap)Y WHERE I SAID THAT. Oh my god... if someone did that in real life, they should be murdered. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
Some do. That's how she got some rando Metra rider to shout "Every word in the book" at her. |
|
| Author: | Jbi11s [ Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wasn't Conor Gillaspie... |
redskingreg wrote: Some do. That's how she got some rando Metra rider to shout "Every word in the book" at her. Idk if it's funny or sad that I know who you're talking about without mentioning a name. I don't want her in my head. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|