Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
3/7: An Argument of Shows https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=105363 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Parkins and Speigs for Glennon-Jason and Dan against acquiring Glennon. Interesting radio with a good disagreement. I think Dan and Jason will prove to be right. |
Author: | denisdman [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Bernsie dead on. Glennon the egg sandwich. |
Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Porkins is an idiot. Glennon is a terrible idea. Bernstain is correct in this instance. |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Parkins is for Glennon? Another reason to hate this liberal little shit |
Author: | Ron Wolfley [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Goff's never had an egg salad sandwich. |
Author: | billypootons [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
nothing should be stopping them from signing glennon AND taking a qb in 2nd or 3rd |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
billypootons wrote: nothing should be stopping them from signing glennon AND taking a qb in 2nd or 3rd That is absolute stupidity |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Ron Wolfley wrote: Goff's never had an egg salad sandwich. and Dan didn't know how Christians celebrated Easter.....I'm seeing a correlation here |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
The guy from KC is a dope |
Author: | Tad Queasy [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Dan didn't know how Christians celebrated Easter.....I'm seeing a correlation here Oh, come on... |
Author: | 312player [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
So the guy who celebrated the Quade hire and Cutler trade is against Glennon? I like Glennons chances than. |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Tad Queasy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: Dan didn't know how Christians celebrated Easter.....I'm seeing a correlation here Oh, come on... |
Author: | Tad Queasy [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: Dan didn't know how Christians celebrated Easter.....I'm seeing a correlation here Oh, come on... I think Bernstein is lying. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
denisdman wrote: Bernsie dead on. Glennon the egg sandwich. Goff: Damn right, cracka!!!! Brothers don't eat egg sandwiches!!!! But I agree with Bernstein. Which, obviously, means I agree with Goff (Goff gets his opinions from Dan). Cutler for 12.5 is better than Glennon at 15. Plus, Cutler is year to year where you can cut him with a low cap hit. Glennon will be front loaded and you have to commit to him for at least 2 years even if he sucks. Look, if you don't like the QB options this year, which I don't, stick with Cutler for another year and see what's available next year. |
Author: | the ghost of t-dub [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Here we go, Blackhawks talk!!!! Oh, it's about Panarin not liking black women... |
Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
"everybody has preferences" "but when you use race...literally the color of one's skin, that is the textbook definition of racism". Dan Bernstein. Discuss. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
the ghost of t-dub wrote: Here we go, Blackhawks talk!!!! Oh, it's about Panarin not liking black women... Goff doesn't like light skinned brothers. Has spread this hate for years. Shouldn't he apologize? |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Dan saying that not finding black women beautiful is racist, but not liking blondes or redheads is a subjective preference in beauty. So black women are objectively beautiful. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Dan saying that not finding black women beautiful is racist, but not liking blondes or redheads is a subjective preference in beauty. So black women are objectively beautiful. For years Dan has said he hates fat women. Shouldn't we make him bang Julie? |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Dan just said it: you're racist if you're not attracted to a certain race. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
By the way, Goff shouldn't want racist Russians to bang black women. Why would he want racist hockey players banging black women? I've often heard Goff say "If you're racist, jut let me know." Well, this guy let you know. Just like Goff has let us know he's racist. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
You HAVE to find beauty in black women, otherwise you are racist. So beauty is subjective...except when it isn't. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Bernstein once called a black women's basketball player a "Wilda beast" and suggested that she had a wang. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
I can't wait to see their February and March books. March is helped out by the ToB, but that's only a couple days out of the month. With no Cubs Baseball to buoy this 5 hours of preening SJW-ism, I doubt they break 2.5. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Beardown wrote: "Wilda beast" You ever graduate high school, Beardown? |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
that's what came up on the spell check so I just hit it. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
The Score's special relationship with the Blackhawks will always amuse me. They're not so important that you could talk about one of their games instead of, like, a Warriors-Rockets game, but they're always important enough for The Big Issues. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Curious Hair wrote: Beardown wrote: "Wilda beast" You ever graduate high school, Beardown? Wilda is Shenaynay's cousin. |
Author: | Beardown [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Goff just called his partner "My wife". Did that son of a gun finally get married? Or is it one of those things where you just call her that at this point. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 3/7: An Argument of Shows |
Goff is IG'ing pictures of the text line. These are people they say to avoid: That second text on the last picture must have made Dan hard...or wet, whatever his preference. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |