I heard B & G sat that they've known about the Addison Russell situation for at least three weeks.
Why wasn't anything said in that period of time?
Don't you think it's incredibly smug for someone to say they knew about a breaking news story all the time but neglected to report on it?

I don't quite see your point here, Sarley.

I heard B & G sat that they've known about the Addison Russell situation for at least three weeks.
Why wasn't anything said in that period of time?
Don't you think it's incredibly smug for someone to say they knew about a breaking news story all the time but neglected to report on it?

They said the Cubs have known about what's up the last few weeks. B & G never said they knew about it.

They said the Cubs have known about what's up the last few weeks. B & G never said they knew about it.

known about what, exactly? that Russell beat his wife? how did they know about that? how would anyone know about that unless Russell was bragging about it.

known about what, exactly? that Russell beat his wife? how did they know about that? how would anyone know about that unless Russell was bragging about it.

They intimated last year that Addison had some issues with cheating and being out on the town. I don't think they knew about the DV rumor.

NOBODY cares if a baseball player is cheating on his wife.

Spanky cares.

If they knew about it for three weeks, and believe domestic violence accusers should be given the benefit of being credible as victims, how could they not report this? Didn't they shield Russell by not saying something?

For a station that took the position that Patrick Kane was guilty without actual evidence and that the Blackhawks should have pre-emptively suspended a player without evidence or charges to support the allegations, and a show that now prides itself on being ahead of the curve on social issues, even moreso since the presidential election, how could they stay quiet when they had such knowledge of a situation this explosive?

Shut up.

If they knew about it for three weeks, and believe domestic violence accusers should be given the benefit of being credible as victims, how could they not report this? Didn't they shield Russell by not saying something?

For a station that took the position that Patrick Kane was guilty without actual evidence and that the Blackhawks should have pre-emptively suspended a player without evidence or charges to support the allegations, and a show that now prides itself on being ahead of the curve on social issues, even moreso since the presidential election, how could they stay quiet when they had such knowledge of a situation this explosive?

Like I said, because Russell is Brown, Goff gives him the benefit of the doubt. Because Theo is Jewish, Bernstein gives him the benefit of the doubt. Because Theo would never get a bad guy.

And, of course, the Cubs are partners with the SCORE.

So Kane was guilty right away. Both Goff and Bernstein loved kicking him. He's white, it's hockey and the SCORE doesn't broadcast their games. They were still on Kane after the mother planted fake evidence to get a conviction.

But they won't do it for the brown Cub with the Jewish President. And the Score broadcasts their games.

We all know what this is. It goes without saying.