Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

11/2: Steve Sparks
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=109337
Page 1 of 1

Author:  City of Fools [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  11/2: Steve Sparks

this is the best B&G show all year. The Greatest.

Author:  Tad Queasy [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Who is filling in for them today?

Author:  City of Fools [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

I didn't say they provided most of the funny content.

But Tanny put together the 7 minute tape and it is hilarious.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Tad Queasy wrote:
Who is filling in for them today?

:lol:

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 3:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Tad Queasy wrote:
Who is filling in for them today?


:lol:

350 down the middle.

Author:  Hypnic Jerk [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 5:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Why did they keep throwing it down to Steve Sparks?

Author:  RFDC [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 5:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Is Tannys audio available anywhere online? It is great.

Author:  Franky T [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

It was funny for a couple minutes, not seven.

Author:  Franky T [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

They were incredulous that the Texans would sign McGloin over Kaepernick. Absolutely zero understanding that they have a game in 3 days and Bill O'Brien might want to sign someone who knows his offense to serve as a backup, as opposed to teaching it to someone new in a couple days.

Author:  Darkside [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Tad Queasy wrote:
Who is filling in for them today?

Outstanding

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 8:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Franky T wrote:
They were incredulous that the Texans would sign McGloin over Kaepernick. Absolutely zero understanding that they have a game in 3 days and Bill O'Brien might want to sign someone who knows his offense to serve as a backup, as opposed to teaching it to someone new in a couple days.


Were there any contractual issues?

It would have been interesting to hear an actual analysis of the available options. I don't know what they were to be honest.

But, gasoline makes a bigger fire.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

I wanted to see Kaepernick catch on as much as anyone, but now that he's suing the league, that just isn't going to happen. Forget it. You don't need to cry for him anymore.

Author:  billypootons [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

can someone provide a time when this hilarious audio was played... they offer a podcast by the hour so its not hard to find if you give us a time

Author:  Heisenberg [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Franky T wrote:
It was funny for a couple minutes, not seven.

Agree. Goff also over hyped a Tom Brady/Jim Gray interview yesterday. It wasn’t the “weirdest thing I’ve heard on radio all year.” Brady simply had almost zero opinion of, nor interaction with, Jimmy G.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

billypootons wrote:
can someone provide a time when this hilarious audio was played... they offer a podcast by the hour so its not hard to find if you give us a time


5pm.

Not that great.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 6:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
billypootons wrote:
can someone provide a time when this hilarious audio was played... they offer a podcast by the hour so its not hard to find if you give us a time


5pm.

Not that great.

The best interview of yesterday’s afternoon shows was John Smoltz on with W&S. Give it a listen, was great .

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

badrogue17 wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
billypootons wrote:
can someone provide a time when this hilarious audio was played... they offer a podcast by the hour so its not hard to find if you give us a time


5pm.

Not that great.

The best interview of yesterday’s afternoon shows was John Smoltz on with W&S. Give it a listen, was great .

I caught the first few minutes of that. It was pretty good. I liked Pleasac's segment, too.

Author:  hnd [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

billypootons wrote:
can someone provide a time when this hilarious audio was played... they offer a podcast by the hour so its not hard to find if you give us a time


they played it at least 4 times yesterday. just pick and hour and pick a point and you are probably on it.

Author:  City of Fools [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Franky T wrote:
They were incredulous that the Texans would sign McGloin over Kaepernick. Absolutely zero understanding that they have a game in 3 days and Bill O'Brien might want to sign someone who knows his offense to serve as a backup, as opposed to teaching it to someone new in a couple days.


Were there any contractual issues?

It would have been interesting to hear an actual analysis of the available options. I don't know what they were to be honest.

But, gasoline makes a bigger fire.

It's Matt McGloin. I don't care how well he knows your offense, it's Matt McGloin.

Author:  Franky T [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

City of Fools wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Franky T wrote:
They were incredulous that the Texans would sign McGloin over Kaepernick. Absolutely zero understanding that they have a game in 3 days and Bill O'Brien might want to sign someone who knows his offense to serve as a backup, as opposed to teaching it to someone new in a couple days.


Were there any contractual issues?

It would have been interesting to hear an actual analysis of the available options. I don't know what they were to be honest.

But, gasoline makes a bigger fire.

It's Matt McGloin. I don't care how well he knows your offense, it's Matt McGloin.

And a game in 3 days. For an emergency fill-in it makes the most sense to sign someone who at least is familiar with the terminology.

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Who the hell is Steve Sparks and what is this all about?

Author:  Bagels [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

pittmike wrote:
Who the hell is Steve Sparks and what is this all about?


Frankly, it sounds made up

Author:  RFDC [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 11:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Bagels wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Who the hell is Steve Sparks and what is this all about?


Frankly, it sounds made up

:lol:

Author:  billypootons [ Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

Parts of it were funny, but not funny enough to play twice in an hour

Author:  BD [ Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

billypootons wrote:
Parts of it were funny, but not funny enough to play twice in an hour


Agreed. It was more surprising that the play by play guy was the person doing this than it actually was funny to me. It definitely wasn't worth playing all day.

Author:  BigW72 [ Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/2: Steve Sparks

billypootons wrote:
Parts of it were funny, but not funny enough to play twice in an hour


perfectly stated.

As someone else mentioned....why on earth did they keep going back to him. They should have aborted that plan after his first interview.

It was funny once.....not nearly as funny as they made it out to be. But to their credit, gave them a really easy day at the office.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/