| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Dan & Matt https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=118767 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Dan & Matt |
The board’s beloved Meat Pants filled in for the worst host on the station, McDouche.... If Bernsie & Spiegs were a full time show, it’d be the best tandem from a purely chemistry point of view. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Haugh is the worst host. Grimace wouldn't last a month hosting with Bernstein. Spiegs gets too sensitive to work with a miserable penis like Bernstein everyday. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
It was a good listen. |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Kirkwood wrote: Haugh is the worst host. Grimace wouldn't last a month hosting with Bernstein. Spiegs gets too sensitive to work with a miserable penis like Bernstein everyday. McDouche Mully Then it’s personal preference, but those 2 are objectively, categorically and easily THEE worst. |
|
| Author: | vitoscotti [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Speigel and Parkins the worst. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
vitoscotti wrote: Speigel and Parkins the worst. You're the worst. |
|
| Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
it was a really solid listen today. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
it was a nice change of pace... And it points out either how overmatched McKnight is, or how bad the pairing is.... or both. |
|
| Author: | Tad Queasy [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Kirkwood wrote: Grimace wouldn't last a month hosting with Bernstein. Spiegs gets too sensitive to work with a miserable penis like Bernstein everyday. Agreed. Remember years ago when Speigel would get himself worked up all show long over something Bernstein said and confront him during transition, only for Bernstein to swat him aside, often acting as though he didn't give a rat's ass about what Speigel thought, leaving him even more upset and frustrated than he was in the first place? I think that would likely happen again, except instead of happening during transition it would happen for the duration of their show until Speigel eventually self-destructed and wandered around Wrigley Field wearing his wife's wedding dress and mumbling to himself. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Kirkwood wrote: Haugh is the worst host. Grimace wouldn't last a month hosting with Bernstein. Spiegs gets too sensitive to work with a miserable penis like Bernstein everyday. Aesthetically, McKnight is horrible. Add to that, by bringing absolutely NOTHING to the table, he is hands down the worst host on the station. That includes everybody. Yup, ev-er-y-bod-y. |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Bernstein has obviously chilled considerably with the dick head act, too much so perhaps. Spiegel takes himself less seriously as well and I think his experience with Parkins and subsequent demotion thickened his skin Point being, Dan and Matt would mesh just fine on a personality front |
|
| Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
I agree with Crick. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Boers and Bernstein was bad. Bernstein and Goff was bad. Bernstein and McKnight is bad. (Note: Boers and Bernstein are now good). Let me guess how the board would view Bernstein and Spiegel once that became reality. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Boers and Bernstein was bad. Bernstein and Goff was bad. Bernstein and McKnight is bad. (Note: Boers and Bernstein are now good). Let me guess how the board would view Bernstein and Spiegel once that became reality. Yup. |
|
| Author: | Augie [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Spiegel has allowed some of Rosenbloom's vocal ticks to populate his speech. Awful. |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Boers and Bernstein was bad. Bernstein and Goff was bad. Bernstein and McKnight is bad. (Note: Boers and Bernstein are now good). Let me guess how the board would view Bernstein and Spiegel once that became reality. So everything is just bad then? Ok great insight I’m talking UPGRADE....Dan and Spiegs would clearly be less bad than Dan/Jason, Dan/Connor Less bad is where I’m at with this |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
August Schell wrote: Spiegel has allowed some of Rosenbloom's vocal ticks to populate his speech. Awful. Hey, he sucks so you don’t have to |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
I have never loved Bernstein more than when he was placed on a shift where I can never listen to him |
|
| Author: | BD [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 5:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Boers and Bernstein was bad. Bernstein and Goff was bad. Bernstein and McKnight is bad. (Note: Boers and Bernstein are now good). Let me guess how the board would view Bernstein and Spiegel once that became reality. I don't think McKnight or Spiegal are bad, they're just sort of 'blah'. Nobody is going turn the station on to listen to either, and they're sort of sidekicks hosts to the main person which is Bernstein. Bernstein is very good when he wants to be. The problem is he likes to provide his social justice crap. Being a sports radio host doesn't make me care about his political opinions, but too many of these hosts think the platform now plays into that (in the age of Trump, we must resist crap..). Goff was awful. Social justice/racism every show. Who wants to listen to that? Boers was fine until he wasn't. He retired years before the Score got rid of him. |
|
| Author: | DAC [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Crick Ramp wrote: If Bernsie & Spiegs were a full time show, it’d be the best tandem from a purely chemistry point of view. Not sure it would be better than Mac and Parko but it would be a helluva lot better than Bernstein and McKnight. The only reason I haven't completely unsubscribed to Bernstein and McKnight are days like today when I can download just today's podcasts. |
|
| Author: | vitoscotti [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
You know Mac is calling it in when he allows Speigel to visit as a baseball expert. |
|
| Author: | Warren Newson [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Say what you will about Spiegel, he is definitely better than Mulli (can't articulate thoughts clearly and has annoying verbal tics, "ON THE SCORE!") and McKnight (has no original opinions on anything and lives to please Bernstein). Swapping either of those guys out for Spiegel would improve either show. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Crick Ramp wrote: The board’s beloved Meat Pants filled in for the worst host on the station, McDouche.... If Bernsie & Spiegs were a full time show, it’d be the best tandem from a purely chemistry point of view. I agree. Firing Spiegel for McDoink was wrong. McDoink isn't interesting. He's not funny. He's basically a robot. Spiegel and Bernstein would have been good. I think it would have been the perfect pairing. I'll say this for Bernstein. I do find him to be funny. Mac is 2nd to him. The rest of the SCORE guys aren't funny at all. |
|
| Author: | cookie23 [ Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Boers and Bernstein was bad. Bernstein and Goff was bad. Bernstein and McKnight is bad. (Note: Boers and Bernstein are now good). Let me guess how the board would view Bernstein and Spiegel once that became reality. Correction Boers and Bernstein until around PSU was great radio. Best in town. Once Dan got all preechy and Terry checked out, yes it was bad Bernstein and Goff was not bad, it was awful. It. Was. Serious. Radio.........on a freakin sports station Bernstein and Mcknight is not bad, its not good, it just meh. Far more Mcknight than Dan. It would be the show you would listen to when you exhuausted your podcasts, siriux/xm, 1000 on a commercial break. Then it might be a short listen Bernstein and Spiegel...I agree with where you are going, board would hate it. Spiegs seems like the good hearted person who has all these great ideas to make the world better, but never pays back friends when he owe's money kind of guy. |
|
| Author: | rogar6 [ Thu Sep 12, 2019 3:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
August Schell wrote: Spiegel has allowed some of Rosenbloom's vocal ticks to populate his speech. Awful. What are those ticks? Is it anything like when Parkins finishes a comment with, "right." He doesn't use it for a question but to somehow confirm what he's saying with his cohost as though it's indisputable and then he continues to prattle on. Dope. |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Thu Sep 12, 2019 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
rogar6 wrote: August Schell wrote: Spiegel has allowed some of Rosenbloom's vocal ticks to populate his speech. Awful. What are those ticks? Is it anything like when Parkins finishes a comment with, "right." He doesn't use it for a question but to somehow confirm what he's saying with his cohost as though it's indisputable and then he continues to prattle on. Dope. Spiegel and Mully do that as well. It’s faaaaar down on the list of his weaknesses though. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Thu Sep 12, 2019 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Boers and Bernstein was bad. Bernstein and Goff was bad. Bernstein and McKnight is bad. (Note: Boers and Bernstein are now good). Let me guess how the board would view Bernstein and Spiegel once that became reality. No Pretty much Yes And that never changed. Eh....I think they'd be right in the middle. Depends on a producer for the show and whether Dan returns to form. |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Spiegs filling in for Mac; this is the official Spiegs filling in thread since this section is dead, save Twitter Muscle Great job today Matt |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Wed Sep 18, 2019 5:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Good show today. |
|
| Author: | DAC [ Wed Sep 18, 2019 7:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Dan & Matt |
Sounds good. I only caught bits and pieces of the show Tuesday and it seemed rough. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|