| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Yeah, but this is totally different. https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=77594 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Yeah, but this is totally different. |
@dan_bernstein wrote: Quenneville would never admit it, but he loves the fact that he can start coaching again. His postgame eye-twinkle was telling. #Blackhawks Jay Cutler's body language: meaningless Joel Quenneville's eye twinkles: telling |
|
| Author: | Franky T [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 8:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Thursdays @ 5:00pm |
|
| Author: | No Clever Moniker [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Dan Bernstein can't be wrong. Not losing 24 straight games didn't involved coaching, it was anything but that. It was a little luck, a lot of momentum, and an indeterminable amount of unmeasurables along with the impromptu dropping of the gloves. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Not sure if serious: one of the biggest triumphs of the season's first half was a strong commitment to lines and pairings that was interrupted only by injuries and ill-fated Dan Carcillo experiments. I thought there was merit to Q letting everyone work with everyone, but it's better to let groups mesh and stay meshed, I guess. Of course, we could be transposing cause and effect: did the Hawks win because Q stopped drawing lines out of a hat, or did Q stop drawing lines out of a hat because the Hawks were winning? At any rate, the future's bright, and it shouldn't take much more than a .600 pace to lock up home ice throughout. Oh, and I wonder if Joel Quenneville's twinkling eyes are interesting enough to spend a night at the bar with him, just learning a tonne of stuff. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Dave In Champaign wrote: @dan_bernstein wrote: Quenneville would never admit it, but he loves the fact that he can start coaching again. His postgame eye-twinkle was telling. #Blackhawks Jay Cutler's body language: meaningless Joel Quenneville's eye twinkles: telling Why is this a thing? Of course a coach whose team has been in the spotlight so much recently is probably happy that this thing is over and they can refocus on the big picture. Do we really need to compare this to the Cutler talk? Seriously? |
|
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
RFDC wrote: Dave In Champaign wrote: @dan_bernstein wrote: Quenneville would never admit it, but he loves the fact that he can start coaching again. His postgame eye-twinkle was telling. #Blackhawks Jay Cutler's body language: meaningless Joel Quenneville's eye twinkles: telling Why is this a thing? Of course a coach whose team has been in the spotlight so much recently is probably happy that this thing is over and they can refocus on the big picture. Do we really need to compare this to the Cutler talk? Seriously? Probably not. Like the thread title says, this is totally different. |
|
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Curious Hair wrote: Not sure if serious: one of the biggest triumphs of the season's first half was a strong commitment to lines and pairings that was interrupted only by injuries and ill-fated Dan Carcillo experiments. I thought there was merit to Q letting everyone work with everyone, but it's better to let groups mesh and stay meshed, I guess. Of course, we could be transposing cause and effect: did the Hawks win because Q stopped drawing lines out of a hat, or did Q stop drawing lines out of a hat because the Hawks were winning? At any rate, the future's bright, and it shouldn't take much more than a .600 pace to lock up home ice throughout. Oh, and I wonder if Joel Quenneville's twinkling eyes are interesting enough to spend a night at the bar with him, just learning a tonne of stuff. Negative. Insufficiently tortured soul. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Dave you are kind of a one trick pony around here. Any chance of you branching out beyond your hate of lil Danny? |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Dave In Champaign wrote: Negative. Insufficiently tortured soul. I think he got a DUI after the Avs fired him. That certainly hints at some imbalance, arguably worse than the whimsical fantasyland of Dan Bernstein where he pretends that NBA coaches are so perpetually harried by everyday office drudgery that they read Kafka to cheer themselves up, and not, I dunno, doofy tall guys. |
|
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
RFDC wrote: Dave you are kind of a one trick pony around here. Any chance of you branching out beyond your hate of lil Danny? Probably not, no. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
You got my vote for Pope of CSFMB, Dave. |
|
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: You got my vote for Pope of CSFMB, Dave. Funny hats and diddlin' for everyone! |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
RFDC wrote: Dave In Champaign wrote: @dan_bernstein wrote: Quenneville would never admit it, but he loves the fact that he can start coaching again. His postgame eye-twinkle was telling. #Blackhawks Jay Cutler's body language: meaningless Joel Quenneville's eye twinkles: telling Why is this a thing? Of course a coach whose team has been in the spotlight so much recently is probably happy that this thing is over and they can refocus on the big picture. Do we really need to compare this to the Cutler talk? Seriously? I'm not sure what your complaint is here. The Cutler body language topic has to do with people speculating about what Cutler is thinking and how other people perceive him. I know in the past you have said this is a stupid topic to speculate on. That's exactly what Dan is doing with the stupid Q eye twinkle thing. That's all Dave is saying. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
FavreFan wrote: I know in the past you have said this is a stupid topic to speculate on. It is stupid. And so is reading/listening to every statement Bernsie makes in order to try and show he is full of crap. |
|
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: I know in the past you have said this is a stupid topic to speculate on. It is stupid. And so is reading/listening to every statement Bernsie makes in order to try and show he is full of crap. Are you implying there's a better use of my time? |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: I know in the past you have said this is a stupid topic to speculate on. It is stupid. And so is reading/listening to every statement Bernsie makes in order to try and show he is full of crap. I stopped doing that when I realized Dave, Curious and Some Guy were better at it. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Trying to read eye twinkles reminds me of how the Toronto media covered Brian Burke and how "the twinkle in his Irish eyes" foretold the acquisition of, I dunno, Francois Beauchemin or something. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
Dave In Champaign wrote: RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: I know in the past you have said this is a stupid topic to speculate on. It is stupid. And so is reading/listening to every statement Bernsie makes in order to try and show he is full of crap. Are you implying there's a better use of my time? 
|
|
| Author: | Dave In Champaign [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Yeah, but this is totally different. |
badrogue17 wrote: RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: I know in the past you have said this is a stupid topic to speculate on. It is stupid. And so is reading/listening to every statement Bernsie makes in order to try and show he is full of crap. I stopped doing that when I realized Dave, Curious and Some Guy were better at it. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|