Are you like that with songs as well, or no?

I'm always amazed at how people absolutely love or hate a song the very first time they hear it.

I generally need a good 5 to 10 plays before I finally "feel" how I really think about it.

:bounce:

Still don't know what that emoticon means.

I like it. Just because the old one was old, doesn't mean it was irreplaceable.

I think as long as you leave the Ditka/Boers interaction in, which Tanney did, it's fair game. Ditka/Boers is what birthed the segment so it's off limits. But the songs are just songs. There are a million songs that reference lying in the chorus.

I always thought "Policy of Truth" by Depeche Mode would make a good WYC theme song. If only Tannehill could replace Steve from Bolingbrook.

My immediate thought was that I didn't hate it. Thought it was OK. Which probably means I'll really like it in a few weeks considering I'm old and I don't like change.

The segment really does just suck. People are more interested being grammatically correct than having good content. Instead of vitriol we get guys worried about a broadcaster who says climate instead of climax...and giggle from the two guys who broke this segment.

Correct. Everybody does the same formula. As you say, we never get the guy who just yells an angry WYC at somebody in about 2 sentences. It's always -

a) Recap of quote typically with bonus smarm at the mention of whoever's name it is
b) 2-3 paragraph commentary on said person/quote with minimum 3 cultural references and 1 word that needs to be looked up in a dictionary
c) Holier than thou conclusion

So, good dolphin, I've got 2 questions for you -

- Why do 80% of the crappers finish with "I've got 2 questions for you"

and

- I don't remember the other one. ?

its 45 seconds too long.... and since they like saving time so much stop telling us EVERY WEEK about your stupid WYC rules once a month should be fine or as needed if a mistake does occur