Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again

Well, so Dan and Terry didn't see this Coulter Northwestern thing coming.

Add it to the list.

Where's my B&B Prediction thread? Can't find it....

I have never heard him say anything that was funny.

This transition is funny as shit. I don't believe any of these Zack stories. There is no way this guy is getting that much ass. He is one of the ugliest people I have seen. So if he really is fucking all these bitches, they must be nasty as fuck. Larry and Dan also said he is one of the funniest guys out there, I don't think so. I have never heard him say anything that was funny.

creature that's always going on about his "precious".

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

creature that's always going on about his "precious".

Rosenbloom?

I used to work in an office full of nerdy and/or married guys. One day after an office party we were all at a bar and I approached a table of pretty hot blonde sisters. I ended up getting the number of the older one and we went out a few times.

The next day at work guys were literally searching me out to say they "heard the story." I'm thinking "haven't you guys ever seen a guy hit on a chick at a bar before?" I mean...it's not like I took off with both sisters or anything.

You have to consider the audience.

a table of pretty hot blonde sisters.

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

a table of pretty hot blonde sisters.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

a table of pretty hot blonde sisters.

Would.

schmitty1121 wrote:

No. Zack is not banging every women he approaches. When Larry tells these stories, he literally portrays Zack as Brad Pitt. And there is something wrong with Larry. How he clings on to stories of Ranger and Zack with women. It's weird.

White Women: Zack? What? No.

Larry used to talk that way about Dan Zampillo too. Have you ever seen Dan Zampillo? He looks like that fucking Lord of the Rings creature that's always going on about his "precious".

Author:	City of Fools [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:29 pm ]
Post subject:	3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Well, so Dan and Terry didn't see this Coulter Northwestern thing coming. Add it to the list. Where's my B&B Prediction thread? Can't find it....

Author:	Scorehead [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
City of Fools wrote: Well, so Dan and Terry didn't see this Coulter Northwestern thing coming. Add it to the list. Where's my B&B Prediction thread? Can't find it.... Far be it for me to defend B&B, but there aren't many people who actually thought that Coulter would win this thing.

Author:	schmitty1121 [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
This transition is funny as shit. I don't believe any of these Zack stories. There is no way this guy is getting that much ass. He is one of the ugliest people I have seen. So if he really is fucking all these bitches, they must be nasty as fuck. Larry and Dan also said he is one of the funniest guys out there, I don't think so. I have never heard him say anything that was funny.

Author:	Don Tiny [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
schmitty1121 wrote: I have never heard him say anything that was funny. You're probably not wrong, but I have to wonder if you would know 'funny' if you heard it in the first place.

Author:	Beardown [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:10 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
schmitty1121 wrote: This transition is funny as shit. I don't believe any of these Zack stories. There is no way this guy is getting that much ass. He is one of the ugliest people I have seen. So if he really is fucking all these bitches, they must be nasty as fuck. Larry and Dan also said he is one of the funniest guys out there, I don't think so. I have never heard him say anything that was funny. No. Zack is not banging every women he approaches. When Larry tells these stories, he literally portrays Zack as Brad Pitt. And there is something wrong with Larry. How he clings on to stories of Ranger and Zack with women. It's weird. White Women: Zack? What? No.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=86023	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Beardown [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
I also don't believe that story about Zack pretending to be his own twin, gabbing it up with some girl in Canton Ohio and then Banging here a half hour later after she rejected him earlier as the other fake twin. I think Zack tells this story. But it never happened. This is pretty much the way Larry describes Zack every fuckin time he talks about Zack with B&B. Larry: Uncle Teary and Dan, you don't understand. Zack has the gift of gab. He talks to women and after 10 minutes, they're naked and spread eagle on the bar floor begging Zack to bang them. Guess what? Zack bangs them right there in front of everybody. Then he gets up and tweets something about the Bears. I know you don't believe me. But it's the truth. Baby!!!! Dan: Really? Larry: Yeah, I'm telling you. Uncle Teary: Are they blind? Larry: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Author:	Beardown [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
..

Author:	Rod [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Larry used to talk that way about Dan Zampillo too. Have you ever seen Dan Zampillo? He looks like that fucking Lord of the Rings creature that's always going on about his "precious".

Author:	Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:47 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: creature that's always going on about his "precious". Rosenbloom?

Author:	Rod [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:51 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: creature that's always going on about his "precious". Rosenbloom? That's "Luscious". Every time Rosenbloom mentions her I picture a 6'5" black transvestite.

Author:	badrogue17 [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
schmitty1121 wrote: This transition is funny as shit. I don't believe any of these Zack stories. There is no way this guy is getting that much ass. He is one of the ugliest people I have seen. So if he really is fucking all these bitches, they must be nasty as fuck. Larry and Dan also said he is one of the funniest guys out there, I don't think so. I have never heard him say anything that was funny. Yeah I heard that and was lolling in the car. " You guys don't understand, Zack gets play". Yeah sure he does Larry.

Author:	Beardown [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Look, what could Zack possibly say, with this great gift of gab, that would make women not realize that Zack looks like Zack?

Author:	Beardown [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:19 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I used to work in an office full of nerdy and/or married guys. One day after an office party we were all at a bar and I approached a table of pretty hot blonde sisters. I ended up getting the number of the older one and we went out a few times. The next day at work guys were literally searching me out to say they "heard the story." I'm thinking "haven't you guys ever seen a guy hit on a chick at a bar before?" I mean...it's not like I took off with both sisters or anything. You have to consider the audience. Yeah. You hit it. I think that's what it is with Larry. He kind of lives vicariously through the people in his life that get women. So their stories become his stories. It's weird as hell. And I think Zack just talking to some bitch at a bar is a win in Larry's mind. I think Zack talks to bitches. I don't think he bangs them. But Larry tells the story like talking to them is "the win".

Author:	Rod [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: a table of pretty hot blonde sisters.

Author:	Curious Hair [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Zaidman's gotta be almost 40 by now, right? Guy's been at the Score/WBBM forever, and has mentioned doing the Pete Rose show, which I remember being on around 1997, 1998.

Author:	good dolphin [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:26 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
I picture Zaidman and Sir out for the night while on the road covering the Bears looking like a modern version of Steve Martin and Dan Akroyd's Wild and Crazy Guys. I bet they are back in the room wearing their footie pajamas the moment the per diem is used up

Author:	Curious Hair [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Everything about Zach is an Informed Attribute. "You should hear how well Zach talks about sandwiches! He really sells you that sandwich! I can't stop thinking about Zach talking about sandwiches! If you heard it, you'd agree!"

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Don Tiny [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: a table of pretty hot blonde sisters. Would. Something profoundly different about a fella that wouldn't; I have a fairly high level of confidence that even a certain painter around these parts would too with no small amount of glee.

Author:	MajorKong [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 9:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Hub: D.J. Williams is clearly the answer in the middle... Really? I know he was pretty good a few years ago, but the guy has only played 13 games over the past two seasons. More like hopefully...

Author:	Tad Queasy [ Wed Mar 26, 2014 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Beardown wrote: schmitty1121 wrote: This transition is funny as shit. I don't believe any of these Zack stories. There is no way this guy is getting that much ass. He is one of the ugliest people I have seen. So if he really is fucking all these bitches, they must be nasty as fuck. Larry and Dan also said he is one of the funniest guys out there, I don't think so. I have never heard him say anything that was funny. No. Zack is not banging every women he approaches. When Larry tells these stories, he literally portrays Zack as Brad Pitt. And there is something wrong with Larry. How he clings on to stories of Ranger and Zack with women. It's weird. White Women: Zack? What? No. Zaidman kind of looks like a red headed Mike Mulligan. Mike Mulligan looks like what would result if Frankenstein fucked Casper. I have, for reasons unknown to me, listened to significant portions of Bears All Access on several occasions while driving home from work. Maybe it's different when he's talking to the ladies, or talking about something other than the Bears, but I have heard little to no evidence of Zack Zaidman being either funny or interesting.

Author:	Don Tiny [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:35 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Larry used to talk that way about Dan Zampillo too. Have you ever seen Dan Zampillo? He looks like that fucking Lord of the Rings creature that's always going on about his "precious". No fucking way. Really? I dont like to take shots at people's physical appearance, but that guy's face is the stuff of nightmares

Author:	Makalu G [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: 3/26: Whoops, we Were Wrong Again
I'm sure Double Z is a nice enough guy and I wouldn't doubt it if he actually got laid, but funny?!? Funny people usually let you know they're funny at some point, not matter how "professional" they may be. I've never heard anything funny out of that cat...