Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
7/30: contact HIGH https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=88176 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | bigfan [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | 7/30: contact HIGH |
Can you get high from 2nd hand smoke? |
Author: | Bagels [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
yes, depending |
Author: | No Clever Moniker [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Secondhand cigarette smoke = bad. Secondhand weed smoke = non-existant? |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
can you get a positive steroid test from turkish wrestling with Mike Trout? |
Author: | Darkside [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Most standard screenings have a cutoff of 50 ng/ml to avoid false positives that may occur as a result of second hand smoke. I don't know if the NFL uses the stricter standard of 20. |
Author: | 312player [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
bigfan wrote: Can you get high from 2nd hand smoke? High? No....unless u were letting couple people blow huge hits in your face in an enclosure like a closet or clam bake in a car. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Darkside wrote: Most standard screenings have a cutoff of 50 ng/ml to avoid false positives that may occur as a result of second hand smoke. I don't know if the NFL uses the stricter standard of 20. Quote: Regardless, the NFL’s current limit of 15 ng/ml needs to change, especially since (as pointed out by ESPN’s Bomani Jones) the World Anti-Doping Agency raised its limit by an order or magnitude in 2013, from 15 to 150 ng/ml.
|
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
If you're shotgunning (blowing smoke in someone's mouth) or totally clam baking in a small space you can get second hand high but in both cases its essentially first hand |
Author: | Darkside [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Kirkwood wrote: Darkside wrote: Most standard screenings have a cutoff of 50 ng/ml to avoid false positives that may occur as a result of second hand smoke. I don't know if the NFL uses the stricter standard of 20. Quote: Regardless, the NFL’s current limit of 15 ng/ml needs to change, especially since (as pointed out by ESPN’s Bomani Jones) the World Anti-Doping Agency raised its limit by an order or magnitude in 2013, from 15 to 150 ng/ml. In this case I would wager that 2nd hand smoke could give us the 15 limit. That being said you are most likely a user is you test positive or you're too close to regular users. Either way it's a big mistake for a player to be in those situations. Still this penalty is a little harsh. |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Darkside wrote: In this case I would wager that 2nd hand smoke could give us the 15 limit. That being said you are most likely a user is you test positive or you're too close to regular users. Either way it's a big mistake for a player to be in those situations. Looks like I need to rethink meeting some people from this board.
Still this penalty is a little harsh. |
Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Darkside wrote: In this case I would wager that 2nd hand smoke could give us the 15 limit. That being said you are most likely a user is you test positive or you're too close to regular users. Either way it's a big mistake for a player to be in those situations. Looks like I need to rethink meeting some people from this board.Still this penalty is a little harsh. Stay away from Panther. |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Douchebag wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Darkside wrote: In this case I would wager that 2nd hand smoke could give us the 15 limit. That being said you are most likely a user is you test positive or you're too close to regular users. Either way it's a big mistake for a player to be in those situations. Looks like I need to rethink meeting some people from this board.Still this penalty is a little harsh. Stay away from Panther. |
Author: | Nas [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Depends on what you consider high to be. |
Author: | Tad Queasy [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Author: | City of Fools [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
hilarious! |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
(re: college campuses) "... even without the football players they're rape factories." Done. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
That should read "rape" factories |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
What did I say about Dan and "rape culture"? IT BEGIIINNSSSS |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 8:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Curious Hair wrote: What did I say about Dan and "rape culture"? IT BEGIIINNSSSS Almost immediately who/what I thought of, and I grumbled to myself about your being right. |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
i get stoned just thinking about weed |
Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
rogers park bryan wrote: If you're shotgunning (blowing smoke in someone's mouth) Is this like a foreplay thing? Why would anyone want to do this? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: If you're shotgunning (blowing smoke in someone's mouth) Is this like a foreplay thing? Why would anyone want to do this? Not like foreplay but definitely something you do with a significant other Some people are weird about smoking and dont know how to hit it. |
Author: | spanky [ Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 7/30: contact HIGH |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: If you're shotgunning (blowing smoke in someone's mouth) Is this like a foreplay thing? Why would anyone want to do this? Girls (allegedly) soak tampons in grain alcohol and then stick them places to get drunk. Suddenly, the "shotgunning" thing seems normal. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |