Lazy that he is going to read the statement in its entirety. Why. Most people can get that idiot. Have a thought and talk.

People in the car possibly would want to know what he's talking about? Weird thing to be angry about.

Danny sounded like he was getting a chubb while reading that.

So where does Jim Hendry sit in the victory parade in relation to Edwin Jackson?

Ok. I figured people want the news in brief and opinion and feedback. I did not consider the car folks. I find it lazy when he reads long pieces on the air. Just me I guess.

bernstein (tried) to make a case that Jackson was a great signing.

So Ricky Renteria is going to get a managerial interview before Ozzie Guillen. That's awesome.

100% imaginary radio. He literally said two different times that was not in any way his point.

It's not the slightest bit imaginary. Anyone else hear it? If not, listen to the podcast. He said an argument could be made that Jackson was a great move that resulted in Bryant and Schwarber. If you heard something else, you're the one who is imagining.

Anyone who says a signing was great because it helped your team lose and therefore get a better draft pick is an asshole, and not a sports fan.

I think there are moves you can make that enable you to do a proper rebuild and draft well, and those moves should be applauded. Starting pitchers who cost a fuck ton of money aren't those moves.

Did you hear him say it? Because I'm pretty sure my radio is very real and working quite well. Don Tiny may need some work on his radio or his imagination.

No, so I can't confirm that's what he said...but I agree that if he said it was a good signing it could only be in the context of helping them tank (which of course Epstein could not have known at the time of the signing).

Terry's take seemed to be that signing a losing pitcher was great but that you didn't need to pay $50 million for him.