Looks like we are getting the same child abuse show we had a few months ago. Dan with lots of yelling, and Terry repeatedly saying "yep." Guess this will be a music day.

Just checked in ... heard "givin' him a whoopin'" and went right back to Pandora.

Will try again later.

Dan even blasts callers who agree with him completely. "I'm a Vikings fan and I agree" "WHO CARES" Holy crap.

Well, a person's fan affiliation is entirely irrelevant to pretty much any topic, let alone beating the shit out of a four year-old kid.

Well, a person's fan affiliation is entirely irrelevant to pretty much any topic, let alone beating the shit out of a four year-old kid.

Dan, isn't it entirely possible that people don't agree with the penalty and/or think it's too harsh AND don't support child beatings or 'whoopins'. People can be disgusted with the actions of Adrian Peterson AND believe in due process. If that due process - via the LEGAL system - did not determine any crime was committed, then we have to live by that. Yes, it's a private business however, the actions weren't done in context of the performance of the job. They were done outside of the confines of the private business' work environment (although that is grey area with athletes and/or public figures). It's simple - should we start down the slippery slope of suspending a person's employment because of actions/behaviors in their personal lives outside of work? I'm sure there are countless cases, but what where does it end? Does the employer fire or suspend an employee because they go and get 20 tattoos of Stewie Griffin? Does the employer fire or suspend the employee because they play in a band with questionable content? Does the employer fire or suspend the employee because they are a swinger and/or like to go to midget orgies? Perhaps the employer suspends or fires the employee because they are a vocal advocate for gay marriage or they are vocally antagonistic to anyone religious as Dan is?

The point? It is entirely possible to despise what Adrian Peterson did and hate him as a human being AND not support his employer suspending him when he hasn't been convicted of a crime.

I also find it funny that Dan (like he did yesterday) uses it as a diatribe against all things southern and invokes the 'well, a lot people also owned slaves'. Funny though, Dan tries to paint this as some southern redneck thing, when what we are seeing in all of these cases and all of the people defending it is that it is the black community involved. That it is them that is saying it is part of their culture and that's how they were raised. Where is Dan condemning the black culture (particularly southern black culture) as a whole as he so freely does with white southern culture? He routinely paints all southern white folks as backwards racists. Will he now paint all southern black folks as serial child abusers?

Someone should send him <a href="http://cbsdetroit.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/paterno-statue-getty-jeff-swensen.jpg?w=1500">horrifying and graphic photos of people abusing infants, like this.</a>

Dan only deals in "ABSOLUTES"..and they are HIS...and he gets to categorize them.

Someone should send him horrifying and graphic photos of people abusing infants, like this.

Or worse, baptizing them. He's probably lose his shit.

Oh. My. God.

Bernstein is hosting a showing of "Happy Valley" on December 3rd.

Oh. My. God.

Bernstein is hosting a showing of "Happy Valley" on December 3rd.

He monetized CHILD RAPE!

That's pretty creepy.

Oh. My. God.

Bernstein is hosting a showing of "Happy Valley" on December 3rd.

He monetized CHILD RAPE!