Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=91652		 Page 1 of 3
Author:  Hatchetman [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:  1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Should be plenty of D-Rose bashing. Is Thibs on the way out??
Author:  redskingreg [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 1:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
I though they were on parade.
Author:  denisdman [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
I thought the regular season didn't matter?
Author:  City of Fools [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
this is the day to ask Dan that question and hear him try to work his way out of a WYC moment.
Author:  8675309 [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
When the Score King and Joffrey ran into Bryan Bickell while shopping for expired meat did they say hello or just demand an autograph without any small talk?
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?
Author:  billypootons [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?


for once he's really dug himself in on an issue.... he better hope his strawmen are right on it or else..... the CSFMB message board cretin will give him shit for being wrong!
Author:  Hatchetman [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
In this instance I hope he's right. I hate Brandon Marshall.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?
Because he is?
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?
Because he is?


Mannelly doesn't seem to think so.
Author:  bpchamp [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
billypootons wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?


for once he's really dug himself in on an issue.... he better hope his strawmen are right on it or else..... the CSFMB message board cretin will give him shit for being wrong!



Dan is right because he said a few weeks ago that no matter who is hired as general manager, letting Marshall go is inevitable, it's a McCaskey decision. Dan is right because he said today if Ryan Pace has ultimate power, then it will be up to him.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?
Because he is?


Mannelly doesn't seem to think so.
Mannely wasn't there for the show in New York, locker room arguments, and Marshall wanting to fight fans on twitter.
Author:  City of Fools [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Pat is careful to note now that he wasn't with the team this year, and that his 2 cents comes from last year.
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
Jesus, why is Bernstein so intent on portraying Brandon Marshall as an ungovernable, uncontrollable, wang-whipper?
Because he is?


Mannelly doesn't seem to think so.
Mannely wasn't there for the show in New York, locker room arguments, and Marshall wanting to fight fans on twitter.


He knows plenty of people who were, and if they told him it was an issue he probably would have said as much.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
He knows plenty of people who were, and if they told him it was an issue he probably would have said as much.
If I were to guess it would not be worth getting involved in for any of those players. You'll hear a lot whenever Marshall is gone.

They couldn't even get Gould to say anything negative after Marshall ripped him in the locker room where all the reporters could hear.
Author:  billypootons [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
City of Fools wrote:
Pat is careful to note now that he wasn't with the team this year, and that his 2 cents comes from last year.


he only provided that caveat after FOTS argued with him about it.... Mannelly wouldn't have volunteered that marshall supportive comment if he had heard there was a problem with brandon this year

i'm of the opinion you give fox a chance to work with marshall this year... none of that crap you list really matters other than the locker room incident but even that didnt sound like it was a big deal that FOTS wants us to think it was
Author:  Douchebag [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
He knows plenty of people who were, and if they told him it was an issue he probably would have said as much.

No he wouldn't. He's not going to break any real dirt on anyone.
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
He knows plenty of people who were, and if they told him it was an issue he probably would have said as much.
If I were to guess it would not be worth getting involved in for any of those players. You'll hear a lot whenever Marshall is gone.

They couldn't even get Gould to say anything negative after Marshall ripped him in the locker room where all the reporters could hear.


I wouldn't expect him to name names, but he can certainly say whether or not people in the locker room think he's a pain in the ass and a disruptive force or if he's not causing problems.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
I wouldn't expect him to name names, but he can certainly say whether or not people in the locker room think he's a pain in the ass and a disruptive force or if he's not causing problems.
I'm going to guess that no one has reached out to him about it.

Bernstein has a guy with the Bears like he has a guy with the Cubs who is in the front office who feeds him information they want out there. I don't really understand why people don't think Bernstein is credible here. He has mostly been right when not mixing in his opinion.

Marshall is a problem, and I still think he has played his last game with the Bears. Fox would have to really love him for him to stay.
Author:  billypootons [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
I wouldn't expect him to name names, but he can certainly say whether or not people in the locker room think he's a pain in the ass and a disruptive force or if he's not causing problems.
I'm going to guess that no one has reached out to him about it.

Bernstein has a guy with the Bears like he has a guy with the Cubs who is in the front office who feeds him information they want out there. I don't really understand why people don't think Bernstein is credible here. He has mostly been right when not mixing in his opinion.

Marshall is a problem, and I still think he has played his last game with the Bears. Fox would have to really love him for him to stay.


bernstein has gone out on a ledge breaking new ground 0 times prior to the Marshall narrative.... trestman firing was obvious and anyone could see that coming.... Bernstein never said Phil was fired.... and was wish washy with any reporting on GM status

His marshall comments are the first bear story he is somewhat breaking as it is not obvious that brandon would be cut. what makes the marshall comments so funny to me is that it flies directly in the face of the phillips/ownership wont meddle in football affairs narrative that FOTS is pushing
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
I wouldn't expect him to name names, but he can certainly say whether or not people in the locker room think he's a pain in the ass and a disruptive force or if he's not causing problems.
I'm going to guess that no one has reached out to him about it.


What makes you say that?
Author:  Hatchetman [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
neither Pace nor Fox has said anything positive about Cutler or Marshall. It wouldn't surprise me if they were both gone.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Tad Queasy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
I wouldn't expect him to name names, but he can certainly say whether or not people in the locker room think he's a pain in the ass and a disruptive force or if he's not causing problems.
I'm going to guess that no one has reached out to him about it.


What makes you say that?
The fact that Robbie Gould, on the radio with them, wouldn't even address it.

Most of the Bears seemed to be simply playing out the string and just trying to get through it. Why call up Mannelly and cause even more issues that are already pretty obvious after Marshall's locker room tirade?
Author:  redskingreg [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Thibs is on #thespectrum, per Dan.
Author:  conns7901 [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
I love how the regular season now matters in the NBA.
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tad Queasy wrote:
I wouldn't expect him to name names, but he can certainly say whether or not people in the locker room think he's a pain in the ass and a disruptive force or if he's not causing problems.
I'm going to guess that no one has reached out to him about it.


What makes you say that?
The fact that Robbie Gould, on the radio with them, wouldn't even address it.

Most of the Bears seemed to be simply playing out the string and just trying to get through it. Why call up Mannelly and cause even more issues that are already pretty obvious after Marshall's locker room tirade?


Just because Robbie Gould wouldn't address it on the radio doesn't mean that no one on the else on the team will discuss it off the record. Mannelly can pick up the phone and talk his friends on the team. He doesn't have to sit around and wait for people to contact him.

If Marshall is more trouble than he's worth and the effects of his behavior isn't being blown out of proportion by the media, then I hope they part ways with him. If not, he's worth keeping.
Author:  City of Fools [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
conns7901 wrote:
I love how the regular season now matters in the NBA.


I'm going to call in about this but I'm sure they're going to say that it means something now due to a lack of a dominant east team.
Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 4:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Does Dan have a piece of the back-end on Pitch Perfect?

And that was definitely a "chick flick".
Author:  Don Tiny [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Sweet merciful Christ, why is Charlie Weis anywhere near Halas Hall?!?
Author:  Peoria Matt [ Tue Jan 20, 2015 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/20: Bulls in Turmoil
Don Tiny wrote:
Sweet merciful Christ, why is Charlie Weis anywhere near Halas Hall?!?


Uhhh........this is a joke, right?
Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/