As Dan has backed up on the "Marshall being definitely gone" he HAS NOW SAID....."IF Marshall stays there is NO WAY he does the Showtime gig".....as I will never watch anyway...I will laugh my ass off if he is while a member of the beloved.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| 1/27: the bears don't want briggs https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=91822 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
holy crap does dan love the word "analogous" or what? he's now saying that the briggs situation is analogous to the marshall situation in that ownership doesn't want him but it's ultimately up to andy pace and the superfriends-of-coaching to decide his fate (aka the cop out so he can say he was always right about marshall even if he's on the roster for opening day) he's saying that ownership thinks briggs and peanut were working against the big picture.... is it that they're trestman guys or that they weren't trestman guys? he doesn't want to paint this as "malicious" or say they're "lockerroom issues" in any ways nor do briggs/peanut mean ill, but they might have been counterproductive in the big picture. "it made things difficult to have people so obviously not on the reservation with you" --- so aha they undermined trestman in the spirit of the old establishment. c'est la vie. ANDY PACE IS THAT DUDE. HE'S A CLEAN DESK GUY. NO DRAMA. HE'S A BOSS! tune in to get told what to think, how to think it, and of course how to communicate it. ask laurence: dan's already in your head, so give in and pay your radio fealty to the greatest host in the history of hosting because HE NEVER ESCAPES YOUR HEAD. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Pat certainly shot down Dan today. That was fun. Dan backed down, noticeably so. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
City of Fools wrote: Pat certainly shot down Dan today. That was fun. Dan backed down, noticeably so. DETAILS, PLEASE. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
aaaaand spiegel's off to eat! file that one under "surprising developments" petty joking aside, yeah CoF, spill the deets because i've been half-in half out as i meander around here making the thread and whatnot. i must have missed the part where A 16 YEAR VETERAN OF THE BEARS earned his due respect up against the sanctimonious man/myth/legend we know simply as "the stain" |
|
| Author: | Bobfromaccounttemps [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
NSJC kept trying to paint Briggs as an awful locker room cancer, and bringing Mannelly into the discussion assuming he will agree with him and Pat just kept shooting it down "Nope", "Nope", "Nope". You can tell he really wants to slug him. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Patrick McNeil wrote: NSJC kept trying to paint Briggs as an awful locker room cancer, and bringing Mannelly into the discussion assuming he will agree with him and Pat just kept shooting it down "Nope", "Nope", "Nope". You can tell he really wants to slug him. NSJC = north shore jesus christ? north shore jewish cancer? north shore jewish contemporary? north shore jewish Caller Bob? help me out here! seeing as this is you and given this account's storied history, im thinking the J is for jewish and i'm working my madlibs game on the c.. hrmmmm. north shore jewish champion? |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
sinicalypse wrote: aaaaand spiegel's off to eat! file that one under "surprising developments" petty joking aside, yeah CoF, spill the deets because i've been half-in half out as i meander around here making the thread and whatnot. i must have missed the part where A 16 YEAR VETERAN OF THE BEARS earned his due respect up against the sanctimonious man/myth/legend we know simply as "the stain" i couldnt do it. when my stomach starts buldging from fat i lose all appetite for weeks. i hate the feeling of fat. i dont know how he is ok with it... just weird to me |
|
| Author: | Tad Queasy [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
City of Fools wrote: Pat certainly shot down Dan today. That was fun. Dan backed down, noticeably so. The longer Mannelly is there, the more often I think that will happen. He is at least Dan's equal intellectually, he seems to keep his cool, and is clearly his superior physically. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
A Matt Abbatacola update is like being dragged to your friend's improv show, and also, the improv show is in Kearney, Nebraska. |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Tad Queasy wrote: City of Fools wrote: Pat certainly shot down Dan today. That was fun. Dan backed down, noticeably so. The longer Mannelly is there, the more often I think that will happen. He is at least Dan's equal intellectually, he seems to keep his cool, and is clearly his superior physically. hes also a way more important person to society than burpstain is |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
This is inside news? I wrote this weeks ago. and it isn't analogous because briggs is no longer under contract, is in his mid 30s and has underperformed for over 2 years |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
I don't find Mannelly very interesting. He would make a nice neighbor I'm sure. Hey Patrick! Can I borrow your extension ladder? Sure, Hatch, c'mon over. |
|
| Author: | T-Bone [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Tad Queasy wrote: City of Fools wrote: Pat certainly shot down Dan today. That was fun. Dan backed down, noticeably so. The longer Mannelly is there, the more often I think that will happen. He is at least Dan's equal intellectually, he seems to keep his cool, and is clearly his superior physically. Well, I'm not sure about that one but I find it funny that Dan could really never say anything disparaging about his education since they both went to the same school. |
|
| Author: | Bobfromaccounttemps [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Belle Knox went to Duke too. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Patrick McNeil wrote: Belle Knox went to Duke too. MONETIZE EVERYTHING |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Curious Hair wrote: A Matt Abbatacola update is like being dragged to your friend's improv show, and also, the improv show is in Kearney, Nebraska. the kids nowadays could refer to him as an "edgelord" and not be wrong. i can picture him making a little aggro face when he's making his rapier-witty remarks kind of like he's trying to force out a rather large nugget of shit first thing in the morning. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
dan "doesn't need the DNA" of the old defensive establishment via urlacher/briggs/etc. i wonder how many women throughout his life have shot him down claiming that they "don't need the DNA" |
|
| Author: | Smarmystein [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Curious Hair wrote: A Matt Abbatacola update is like being dragged to your friend's improv show, and also, the improv show is in Kearney, Nebraska. ...on a Tuesday night. |
|
| Author: | Smarmystein [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
As Dan has backed up on the "Marshall being definitely gone" he HAS NOW SAID....."IF Marshall stays there is NO WAY he does the Showtime gig".....as I will never watch anyway...I will laugh my ass off if he is while a member of the beloved.
|
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
City of Fools wrote: Pat certainly shot down Dan today. That was fun. Dan backed down, noticeably so. THIS WAS NICE BEFORE ONE TURNS STATION OFF. So the problems in the Bears system last year was Cutler, Marshall, Briggs and now Tillman! Not really problems, but I think the word 'Distant" and "not on the same island" is about as deifnitive as Dan could be without the guy who is friends with briggs and peanut telling him he is wrong. Yaawnnnnnn. hey, they got me listening to Tranny, which I bet some radio stat guy projects out to 3 hours of listening. lol |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
I hope he puts Lawrence in an uncomfortable spot by bringing this up to him |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Then they will just say "peanut hates football" |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
publicly pining for Lovie aint exactly doing wonders for your present coach. |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YtOOeDEJ6Y id say closer to 50 with a lot of makeup on |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgDZ33f ... 1422327029 |
|
| Author: | Reared on the Score [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
bigfan wrote: Not really problems, but I think the word 'Distant" and "not on the same island" but Dan, you were the same guy who said stuff when the kumbaya all-for-one attitude was the wrong thing to do...so who you crappin' |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
this Gregory Matthews piece...where is it? |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
Mark it down. Dan Betnstein made me laugh. His recital of West Side Mikes call was funny |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
That was awesome. The show should always be fun like that. |
|
| Author: | schmitty1121 [ Tue Jan 27, 2015 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1/27: the bears don't want briggs |
When will the bullshit stop? Now Dan says he received texts from a former equipment guy, who told him how you would deflate the balls in 90 seconds. Then he says, he's not going to say the guys name, but it's a reliable guy. Hard for me to believe this, when you bring it up almost 3 hours into your show. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|