Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=92447 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
"The man knows what he's doing. Still, I'm John Feinstein." |
Author: | Reared on the Score [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
David Diehl isn't afraid like Bernstein. https://twitter.com/davediehl66/status/ ... 0810262528 Or maybe Dan is talking about this explicitly, I wouldn't know unless someone here told me first. |
Author: | spmack [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Just post it here, Reared. Chris Kuc probably knows about it but didn't report it. I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
spmack wrote: Just post it here, Reared. Chris Kuc probably knows about it but didn't report it. I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. You were wondering why he blocked you? |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
When did this fight supposedly happen? |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
OK calling my guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Why did these reporters go to journalism school? |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
spmack wrote: I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. No question. We should have the kind of hockey media Toronto has, though it bears mentioning that Toronto is the fourth most common city for the big bitches that are NHL players to veto trades to. |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
bigfan wrote: OK calling my guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! or emailing him |
Author: | SteveSarley [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
bigfan wrote: OK calling my guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When Boers brought this up yesterday he said he hadn't talked to his Hawk guy yet. How does he have a Hawk guy? He (and his partner) know little about the Hawks. I don't think they have any "guys" in any of the local sports. |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Curious Hair wrote: spmack wrote: I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. No question. We should have the kind of hockey media Toronto has, though it bears mentioning that Toronto is the fourth most common city for the big bitches that are NHL players to veto trades to. CI have anything on this? |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
The only Hawks guy they know is McDonough when he gives them a free jersey in the suite they take their kids to. |
Author: | spmack [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: spmack wrote: Just post it here, Reared. Chris Kuc probably knows about it but didn't report it. I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. You were wondering why he blocked you? But he would have had to specifically found my account since I never said anything to him directly. |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
spmack wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: spmack wrote: Just post it here, Reared. Chris Kuc probably knows about it but didn't report it. I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. You were wondering why he blocked you? But he would have had to specifically found my account since I never said anything to him directly. Don't be so fucking modest. The spmack brand is well known throughout Chicago sports media. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
badrogue17 wrote: Curious Hair wrote: spmack wrote: I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. No question. We should have the kind of hockey media Toronto has, though it bears mentioning that Toronto is the fourth most common city for the big bitches that are NHL players to veto trades to. CI have anything on this? Deadspin had it, I believe. The most common places where players don't want to go are Edmonton, Winnipeg, Buffalo, Toronto, and Ottawa. Florida, Phoenix, New Jersey, and Montreal are also places that players will avoid at all costs. Hockey players are so tough that they'll skate on a broken leg, but too sissy to live where it's cold in the winter. (Or too hot in the case of Phoenix and Florida.) Go figure. |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Curious Hair wrote: badrogue17 wrote: Curious Hair wrote: spmack wrote: I think media in this town is soft, but they are kid gloves soft when it comes to the Hawks. No question. We should have the kind of hockey media Toronto has, though it bears mentioning that Toronto is the fourth most common city for the big bitches that are NHL players to veto trades to. CI have anything on this? Deadspin had it, I believe. The most common places where players don't want to go are Edmonton, Winnipeg, Buffalo, Toronto, and Ottawa. Florida, Phoenix, New Jersey, and Montreal are also places that players will avoid at all costs. Hockey players are so tough that they'll skate on a broken leg, but too sissy to live where it's cold in the winter. (Or too hot in the case of Phoenix and Florida.) Go figure. I meant about the Sharp stuff / brawl. |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Fla and Phx likely due to clown college ownership? |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
SteveSarley wrote: bigfan wrote: OK calling my guy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When Boers brought this up yesterday he said he hadn't talked to his Hawk guy yet. How does he have a Hawk guy? He (and his partner) know little about the Hawks. I don't think they have any "guys" in any of the local sports. Terry and I should have the same Hawks guy....but dont know if Terry stays in touch with him... Bernstein can call Adam Rogowin, is who he calls when he needs tickets, but dont think Rogowin would tell him anything. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
pittmike wrote: Fla and Phx likely due to clown college ownership? Bingo. They're afraid the teams might move to Canada. Quick: name a big-name Canadian who signed with a Canadian team in free agency. |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Phoenix growing way too fast, not losing a team. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
No one wants to play in Toronto because their media is the capital of hockey #hottakes. They'll ruin your career if you slump. Montreal is similar but I believe their media and fans secretly hate every player on their team who isn't French-Canadian. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
bigfan wrote: Phoenix growing way too fast, not losing a team. They were 15 minutes from heading back to Winnipeg in 2010 if not for Glendale giving the NHL $25MM to stay another year. Phoenix is there to hedge against high-revenue teams. |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Curious Hair wrote: pittmike wrote: Fla and Phx likely due to clown college ownership? Bingo. They're afraid the teams might move to Canada. Quick: name a big-name Canadian who signed with a Canadian team in free agency. Good question. Nothing pops right away but Europeans have gone to Ottawa. |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Curious Hair wrote: bigfan wrote: Phoenix growing way too fast, not losing a team. They were 15 minutes from heading back to Winnipeg in 2010 if not for Glendale giving the NHL $25MM to stay another year. Phoenix is there to hedge against high-revenue teams. and they will stay there...UNLESS...Vegas calls, they will get whom they want |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
pittmike wrote: Curious Hair wrote: pittmike wrote: Fla and Phx likely due to clown college ownership? Bingo. They're afraid the teams might move to Canada. Quick: name a big-name Canadian who signed with a Canadian team in free agency. Good question. Nothing pops right away but Europeans have gone to Ottawa. Europeans generally don't care. Everything is equally Not Home, and if anything, places like Winnipeg and Montreal are easier to settle into than Phoenix or Dallas. Winnipeg and Quebec City were on the vanguard of incorporating European finesse players at a time when old NHL teams were largely apprehensive. Detroit probably reminds Russians and Slovaks of old Communist Bloc shitholes. They play there then go home in the offseason and in retirement and that's just the understood agreement. (Though come to think of it, Thomas Steen was an MLA or city councillor in Winnipeg, and some of the Stastnys still live in QC.) But Canadians not only run screaming from their country, they become dual citizens and live in the States in retirement. Wayne Gretzky is voted the Greatest Canadian Ever or some shit. He's lived in Los Angeles for years. Some Canadian! But when the Olympics roll around, they're all as Canadian as can be. Then they go back to preferring to live in Florida just like anybody else would. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
bigfan wrote: Curious Hair wrote: bigfan wrote: Phoenix growing way too fast, not losing a team. They were 15 minutes from heading back to Winnipeg in 2010 if not for Glendale giving the NHL $25MM to stay another year. Phoenix is there to hedge against high-revenue teams. and they will stay there...UNLESS...Vegas calls, they will get whom they want Did you see the ticket drive they're having in Las Vegas? They sold 5,000 tickets in 36 hours, then 2,000 in 14 days. Winnipeg sold 13,000 in less than ten minutes. But we gotta get in on this Vegas thing. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Haha. "You guys are trying to deal in innuendo. I'm trying to deal in facts." |
Author: | City of Fools [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
that was absolutely hilarious.... |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Quote: Daren Millard ✔ @darenmillard Follow Re @NHLBlackhawks report of a fight in the dressing room. I'm told the group held its 1st team meeting in yrs but no scraps. Chemistry good What? Seriously, do reporters live in la-la land? |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2/26: another day of Sharp innuendo |
Curious Hair wrote: Haha. "You guys are trying to deal in innuendo. I'm trying to deal in facts." Yes this Mark is telling me there is no Sharp shit to worry about and these two clowns won't back down. Even after he told them stop fucking around more or less. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |