Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=97062		 Page 1 of 7
Author:  Beardown [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:26 am ]
Post subject:  11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Bernstein: Have you heard what's being said on twitter?

Boers: Oh yeah. I heard about it.

Bernstein: Disgusting.

Boers: Yep. Disgusting.

Bernstein: Oy. Anyway, we're gonna bring Julie in after the break to talk about how victims can't take the stress of seeing these rape trials to their conclusion.
Author:  IkeSouth [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
So do i get this story right?

Kane brought ugly girl back to house

Ugly girl gets nutty because she thinks shes hot

Kane doesnt want to fuck crazy girl so he turns her down

She freaks and for revenge cries rape

After much publicity, kane privately gives her $25k to shut the fuck up

She agrees.
Author:  Gloopan Kuratz [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
I don't think she was ugly.
She apparently had DNA from more than one man on her.
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
I don't think she was ugly.

She's very cute.
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Bernstein will imply that the Lake Forest Police Department are also likely involved in a nefarious capacity in this case.
Author:  Franky T [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 11:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Who knows what really happened, but I'm guessing Danny won't even allow for the possibility that she doesn't want to move forward because she was lying. If anyone calls in to suggested that they will be shouted down.
Author:  Beardown [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
IkeSouth wrote:
So do i get this story right?

Kane brought ugly girl back to house

Ugly girl gets nutty because she thinks shes hot

Kane doesnt want to fuck crazy girl so he turns her down

She freaks and for revenge cries rape

After much publicity, kane privately gives her $25k to shut the fuck up

She agrees.


Bernstein: See what I mean, Terry? You knew it was coming. The "Fan Boys" are out in full force today.

Boers: Oh yeah. I knew it was coming. Ass wipes!!!!! All of them!!!!!

Bernstein: Now we bring in Julie Dicaro. So now what, Julie? Do we just add Kane to the list of people who get away with rape?

Julie: I'm afraid so.
Author:  redskingreg [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Franky T wrote:
Who knows what really happened, but I'm guessing Danny won't even allow for the possibility that she doesn't want to move forward because she was lying. If anyone calls in to suggested that they will be shouted down.


He will say it doesn't mean Kane didn't do it, but he sure as shit won't entertain the other side of that coin.
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
redskingreg wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Who knows what really happened, but I'm guessing Danny won't even allow for the possibility that she doesn't want to move forward because she was lying. If anyone calls in to suggested that they will be shouted down.


He will say it doesn't mean Kane didn't do it, but he sure as shit won't entertain the other side of that coin.

Because why would she open herself up to the kind of scrutiny and harassment from Kane fanboys that she is getting if she wasn't raped? This is exactly why she's not pursuing this any further.
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
So determining a managers value is a nebulous concept and hard to determine how much they mattersbut we do know that Ned Yost,Matheny, and Dusty Baker are bad managers. Our reasoning when dopes like Yost do win it? Well, baseball is just weird. JFC.
Author:  pittmike [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
B&B have us twisted in knots. Just puppet masters playing with us by strings.
Author:  IMU [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
IkeSouth wrote:
After much publicity, kane privately gives her $25k to shut the fuck up

Well, you can't spend justice at any store I know of.
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Franky T wrote:
Who knows what really happened, but I'm guessing Danny won't even allow for the possibility that she doesn't want to move forward because she was lying. If anyone calls in to suggested that they will be shouted down.


This is why everyone should give it a rest at this point.
Author:  Gloopan Kuratz [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Bernsie: Now let's go to Score rape expert Julie DiCaro. Looks like another one got away.

Julie: Afraid so Dan. It's so hard for women....

Terry : Yes it is young lady.

Julie: Off to HR again....
Author:  mrgoodkat [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

There needs to be far more of that when it comes to the epidemic of false allegation that actually exists, in order to right the narrative.
Author:  IMU [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

What is the scenario if they truthfully accused you of rape?
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

Maybe that scummy off duty cop Kane has corrupted can dig up some dirt on her.
Author:  mrgoodkat [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
IMU wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

What is the scenario if they truthfully accused you of rape?


A prosecutor decides to prosecute?

badrogue17 wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

Maybe that scummy off duty cop Kane has corrupted can dig up some dirt on her.


Would you cry for her?
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
mrgoodkat wrote:
IMU wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

What is the scenario if they truthfully accused you of rape?


A prosecutor decides to prosecute?

badrogue17 wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.

Maybe that scummy off duty cop Kane has corrupted can dig up some dirt on her.


Would you cry for her?

A river of SJW tears, yes.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.
While Kane is not the same as Bill Cosby who is going to have to testify in a suit brought by Janice Dickinson, if you make the accusation that the accuser is lying they can sue you for defamation, put you on the stand and force you to testify, and all with a much lower presumption of innocence.

Kane already won. The accusers mom made that a certainty.
Author:  mrgoodkat [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
If someone falsely accused me of rape, if that is what happened, I would use every last dime to discredit that person. Wouldn't sue them but would make it my life's goal to make it known that they lied.
While Kane is not the same as Bill Cosby who is going to have to testify in a suit brought by Janice Dickinson, if you make the accusation that the accuser is lying they can sue you for defamation, put you on the stand and force you to testify, and all with a much lower presumption of innocence.

Kane already won. The accusers mom made that a certainty.



Sure, you don't go off halfcocked. Spend some considerable money and time to build a case. Most of it was probably already done by a defense team. Clear your name to these simpletons who will always just assume you raped a girl. Shouldn't be too hard considering the quality of human being she has in her inner circle.

What was that thing they said about the apple and the tree?
Author:  No Clever Moniker [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
So after the Bukkake, Kaner called it quits while one of his bros stumbled over her. Blinded by the ectoplasm that got in her eyes, she swore it was Kane but was mistaken.

As for being sued for defamation, she also has to prove that she isn't a liar and that would mean deposing everyone else. If she can't/won't do it for free (District Attorney), what makes you think she's got the coin to go the Gloria Allred route? The reason Kane won't go after her is then it does become true victim shaming (as she is now a self-described victim) and sympathy would extend to her by the SJWs who think Kane should do better things with his money.
Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 5:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
I has a question.

If a rape did occur and the rapist is not Kane and we know all who were present, why isn't someone being charged?
Author:  bigfan [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
pittmike wrote:
B&B have us twisted in knots. Just puppet masters playing with us by strings.


Nope

The gradual WSCR removal I believe is complete. feel like apologizing the M&H, but knowing that actual Bears info isnt even reported anymore, I can just tune in to ESPN for the same junk without having guys that are Asswipes report it.
Author:  Spaulding [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Yeah. I thought about that too. Or why was it reported Kane was the accused?
Author:  Beardown [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
.
Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
good dolphin wrote:
I has a question.

If a rape did occur and the rapist is not Kane and we know all who were present, why isn't someone being charged?

I believe the accuser named Kane as the "rapist" specifically. Why would they charge anyone else?
Author:  No Clever Moniker [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
What do we really know? Seriously?

The incident happened at his house. Known.

How many were there?

How long were they there?

Who left and when?

How did she get to the hospital? Known.

What happened? Who leaked what, and to whom? And when?

She lawyered up before talking to the police (criminal defense).

I could go on. Tim Graham from the Buffalo News broke the story first. He's now been relegated to the back bench on Sunday's story. That's an editor's move to punish a reporter, add your byline one more time to the retraction/clarification story.
Author:  No Clever Moniker [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
Graham was whom both Bernstein and DiCaro used as their source. He pushed all in on this story, and they were willing to sign the proverbial "marker" for him to continue.
Author:  pittmike [ Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 11/3: IT. DOESN'T. MEAN. KANE. IS. INNOCENT
And now Bernsien is silent....
Page 1 of 7 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/