redskingreg wrote:
It's shift change, you bunch of unevolved nitwits.
How you like this transition?
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| 12/16: White Sox are bad https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=97757 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | 12/16: White Sox are bad |
They'll always be bad. Everything is bad. Every move they make is bad. None of this makes sense. White Sox now getting the Illini treatment once Northwestern signed a deal with them! |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Good thing you moved on to greener pastures eh. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
312player wrote: Good thing you moved on to greener pastures eh. Yup.
|
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
I did hear Giggles ripping them earlier, saying eight years is a long time without a playoff appearance. 107 years without a championship is fine, though, because The Plan. |
|
| Author: | Reared on the Score [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 2:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
I assume The Chairman is still all fine and good, though. #PerniciousMyths |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 2:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
I missed tranny and early part of the show. Are they really breaking completely bad on the deal? |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
pittmike wrote: I missed tranny and early part of the show. Are they really breaking completely bad on the deal? They both basically said they were indifferent to the deal. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
RFDC wrote: pittmike wrote: I missed tranny and early part of the show. Are they really breaking completely bad on the deal? They both basically said they were indifferent to the deal. You must be listening to a different show than me because they don't even get why the Sox would try and win. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: RFDC wrote: pittmike wrote: I missed tranny and early part of the show. Are they really breaking completely bad on the deal? They both basically said they were indifferent to the deal. You must be listening to a different show than me because they don't even get why the Sox would try and win. In transition Goff and Asshat asked them their thoughts. They both said they were indifferent to it. They have went on and said that probably because it is the Sox the deal will end up being bad. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
RFDC wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: RFDC wrote: pittmike wrote: I missed tranny and early part of the show. Are they really breaking completely bad on the deal? They both basically said they were indifferent to the deal. You must be listening to a different show than me because they don't even get why the Sox would try and win. In transition Goff and Asshat asked them their thoughts. They both said they were indifferent to it. They have went on and said that probably because it is the Sox the deal will end up being bad. I normally skip transition now. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Ok so the transformation is complete. The Sox are now the same as white basketball players. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
It's shift change, you bunch of unevolved nitwits. |
|
| Author: | denisdman [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
redskingreg wrote: It's shift change, you bunch of unevolved nitwits. How you like this transition? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Bernstein with more inside info. Hahn is in charge. They are trying to win now without giving up their top prospects. Jerry still heavily involved. Ultimately, it is the White Sox fans fault. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
denisdman wrote: redskingreg wrote: It's shift change, you bunch of unevolved nitwits. How you like this transition? I crack up any time Caitlyn is on there. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
No surprise Danny backed big jerry and Hahn. |
|
| Author: | Tad Queasy [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Are they calling it "Shift Change" because it's sponsored by the Chicago Wolves and they wanted to use a hockey term or because they think saying "transition", not just "tranny", is insensitive to the LGBTQ community? |
|
| Author: | Reared on the Score [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Tad Queasy wrote: Are they calling it "Shift Change" because it's sponsored by the Chicago Wolves and they wanted to use a hockey term or because they think saying "transition", not just "tranny", is insensitive to the LGBTQ community? I'm assuming the latter. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
It's LGBTQIA now. Please do not exclude anyone but cisgendered white make shitlords. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Tad Queasy wrote: Are they calling it "Shift Change" because it's sponsored by the Chicago Wolves and they wanted to use a hockey term or because they think saying "transition", not just "tranny", is insensitive to the LGBTQ community? DiCaro complained to HR about the term "tranny" |
|
| Author: | Tad Queasy [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Gloopan Kuratz wrote: Tad Queasy wrote: Are they calling it "Shift Change" because it's sponsored by the Chicago Wolves and they wanted to use a hockey term or because they think saying "transition", not just "tranny", is insensitive to the LGBTQ community? DiCaro complained to HR about the term "tranny" I remember Big Purple said he got a call or a text from someone who was transgendered and asked him to stop saying "tranny." Eliminating legitimate uses of the word "transition" seems ridiculous, but if saying that you don't find certain women hot can get you suspended from college for six months I don't think I'm going to be surprised by anything any more. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Tad Queasy wrote: I remember Big Purple said he got a call or a text from someone who was transgendered and asked him to stop saying "tranny." Christina Kahrl? |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
why wouldn't the Sox make a run at Alex Gordon at this point? They might as well try and contend... |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Big Hurt on now having fun giving Cubs shit. 
|
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
pittmike wrote: Big Hurt on now having fun giving Cubs shit. he could have brought up the reduction in defensive value if the Cubs put Heyward in center...he questioned the deal anyway... |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
City of Fools wrote: pittmike wrote: Big Hurt on now having fun giving Cubs shit. he could have brought up the reduction in defensive value if the Cubs put Heyward in center...he questioned the deal anyway... Way better than Fowler, according to WAR. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Of the people people on the B&B show, why would "Hoodie footie" choose Terry to read the spots? It's kind of a sexual read. Terry's not good at selling sex. He's 65 years old. His wife lost interest in him years ago. She'd laugh at him if he bought a hoodie footie for her. Not that Dan is a good choice for the read either. But at least he's not a senior citizen. Drinky gets a lot of sponsor reads. You'd think he'd get this one instead of the old man. It's just weird hearing Terry say "How can it be hot if she's cold" or something like that. Whatever the read is. |
|
| Author: | IMissMyHair [ Wed Dec 16, 2015 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
I still think this was not a bad move today, and I think that the Sox are not done......subtracting Samardja, plus Frazier, catch lightning in a bottle......I think the Sox will be better next year than this year.....will it be enough? You never know what can happen.....a little hope here!! |
|
| Author: | No Clever Moniker [ Thu Dec 17, 2015 2:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Bernstein with more inside info. Hahn is in charge. They are trying to win now without giving up their top prospects. Jerry still heavily involved. Ultimately, it is the White Sox fans fault. Sometimes I'm tuning in and I'm not sure of what I'm hearing. Some caller being overtalked, then Terry babbling, and then ??? So I guess this is what was being intimated? Jerry's tried everything, everything, but the fans won't come out. My thought. Maybe its time for new ownership. It worked for the Cubs. |
|
| Author: | MajorKong [ Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 12/16: White Sox are bad |
pittmike wrote: Big Hurt on now having fun giving Cubs shit. Justin Upton: .271/.352/.473, -51.3 Defensive Runs Above Average, 26.5 WAR (9 seasons) Jason Heyward: .268/.353/.431, 61.9 DRA, 27.8 WAR (6 seasons) ...And Frank thinks Upton is WAY better. I understand its a different caliber of player but it kinda reminds me of when the White Sox had a chance to acquire Barry Bonds and Frank urged them to sign George Bell instead (which they did). |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|