Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Why??
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=119143
Page 1 of 1

Author:  pittmike [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:25 am ]
Post subject:  Why??

The fuck is Zach Zaidman on my radio talking Bears. Arrrggghhhh I thought we were done with this when he took Cubs beat.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

They came out of commercial break to "Rue the Whirl" by Boards of Canada last hour and I marked out. Mully Has The Right To Haugh.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Same here. Turned on the radio and heard Zach making excuses for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Click.

Author:  vitoscotti [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

ZZ in the few minutes I've listened has made excuses for the Brewers, Craig Counsell, and Maddon.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Peoria Matt wrote:
Same here. Turned on the radio and heard Zach making excuses for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Click.
Smart move. He then proceeded to make excuses for the Cubs.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Same here. Turned on the radio and heard Zach making excuses for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Click.
Smart move. He then proceeded to make excuses for the Cubs.


I'll hand it to Zach...he seamlessly made the company line transition from Bears to Cubs.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

He sure has. Kruetz teased him on that earlier. Said he was impressed how was able to 'support the Cubs with every fiber of his being.'

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

:lol:

Kruetz is awesome.

Author:  Crick Ramp [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

I’ll take Double Z over Mulli, Hanley, and McDoink simply off his speaking skills alone.

As far as his takes, that’s almost immaterial but of course he’s not gonna bash the teams he covers.
ZZ is very over hated on this board

Author:  Crick Ramp [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Peoria Matt wrote:
:lol:

Kruetz is awesome.



Fustrated. Fustrated. Fustrated.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Crick Ramp wrote:
I’ll take Double Z over Mulli, Hanley, and McDoink simply off his speaking skills alone.

As far as his takes, that’s almost immaterial but of course he’s not gonna bash the teams he covers.
ZZ is very over hated on this board


So because he has good "speaking skills", he should be on the radio. And what he says is immaterial. That sounds like an awesome formula. I'll take Kruetz's "fustrated" over Zach's mastery of speaking any day.

Also, he doesn't cover the Bears.

Any critical thoughts on Chicago teams are not part of his repertoire.

Keep it.

Author:  Crick Ramp [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Peoria Matt wrote:
Crick Ramp wrote:
I’ll take Double Z over Mulli, Hanley, and McDoink simply off his speaking skills alone.

As far as his takes, that’s almost immaterial but of course he’s not gonna bash the teams he covers.
ZZ is very over hated on this board


So because he has good "speaking skills", he should be on the radio. And what he says is immaterial. That sounds like an awesome formula. I'll take Kruetz's "fustrated" over Zach's mastery of speaking any day.

Also, he doesn't cover the Bears.

Any critical thoughts on Chicago teams are not part of his repertoire.

Keep it.


The next post you read closely will probably be your first.

I was comparing ZZ to Mulli and Hanley. They suck sooooo bad—in my opinion—I’d rather hear ZZ. That’s the take.

Disagree if you please. But try and be less stupid.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Crick Ramp wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Crick Ramp wrote:
I’ll take Double Z over Mulli, Hanley, and McDoink simply off his speaking skills alone.

As far as his takes, that’s almost immaterial but of course he’s not gonna bash the teams he covers.
ZZ is very over hated on this board


So because he has good "speaking skills", he should be on the radio. And what he says is immaterial. That sounds like an awesome formula. I'll take Kruetz's "fustrated" over Zach's mastery of speaking any day.

Also, he doesn't cover the Bears.

Any critical thoughts on Chicago teams are not part of his repertoire.

Keep it.


The next post you read closely will probably be your first.

I was comparing ZZ to Mulli and Hanley. They suck sooooo bad—in my opinion—I’d rather hear ZZ. That’s the take.

Disagree if you please. But try and be less stupid.


Yes, I do disagree. Who you were comparing him to had zero to do with my response. The original postings were in regards to Zaidman's excuse making for the teams.

Try and be less of an ass.

Author:  beni hanna [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Beni chose to listen for years to ZZ. He isn't hated. He's probably a decent humanoid in person. He serves no useful purpose for MANY on this bored. The Homer schtick got old when Lovie was still coaching the beloved. The fine representative from downstate is accurate in his assessment. ZZ has no ability to provide an unbiased opinion of the teams he covers. Company line drivel doesn't fly with most here. Maybe its more accepted now as you are here. That's one ZZ supporter. Find some more ZZ supporters and this could be fun.

Author:  denisdman [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

beni hanna wrote:
Beni chose to listen for years to ZZ. He isn't hated. He's probably a decent humanoid in person. He serves no useful purpose for MANY on this bored. The Homer schtick got old when Lovie was still coaching the beloved. The fine representative from downstate is accurate in his assessment. ZZ has no ability to provide an unbiased opinion of the teams he covers. Company line drivel doesn't fly with most here. Maybe its more accepted now as you are here. That's one ZZ supporter. Find some more ZZ supporters and this could be fun.


I enjoy his homer perspective. That’s two. Three times a charm.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

And I don't "hate" Zach. I bet he's a good guy. Just not interested in hearing any of his Cubs/Bears commentary.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

STFU, Cricket. If ZZ speaks so eloquently, then let him read news stories or traffic reports.

Author:  Chet Coppock's Fur Coat [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Zzzzz has exceeded his potential. He is the guy who is a AAA and mid-major PBP guy who has the 10-2 shift in a city like Louisville after Golic and Wingo.

Author:  redskingreg [ Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

You are literally on top of the players.

Author:  vitoscotti [ Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

ZZ 10/14 5@5

Generally QB sacks come on passing plays, not running plays. (Oh really)

The next Cubs manager will not be better than Joe Maddon. (That's a scary thought)

Referring to trading Cease, Torres, Eloy. If you're all in for future championships these are moves you have to make. (Maybe could of got Chapman, Q cheaper instead of getting fleeced Zack?)

Theo is still here, and that's what should give you faith running forward.

No one could of imagined Russell being this during the Torres trade. (Weren't there rumblings of Russel's off field life early. On field 2015-242 307 389 696. 2016-238 321 417 738)

Why would a football recruit go to Illinois when other schools have better facilities?

Author:  Crick Ramp [ Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

vitoscotti wrote:
ZZ 10/14 5@5

Generally QB sacks come on passing plays, not running plays. (Oh really)

The next Cubs manager will not be better than Joe Maddon. (That's a scary thought)

Referring to trading Cease, Torres, Eloy. If you're all in for future championships these are moves you have to make. (Maybe could of got Chapman, Q cheaper instead of getting fleeced Zack?)

Theo is still here, and that's what should give you faith running forward.

No one could of imagined Russell being this during the Torres trade. (Weren't there rumblings of Russel's off field life early. On field 2015-242 307 389 696. 2016-238 321 417 738)

Why would a football recruit go to Illinois when other schools have better facilities?


You do realize if a running, bullet point list was made for Mulli, Hanley, McDouche, etc that it would be at least equally as bad.

Grading on a curve for the win

Author:  vitoscotti [ Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Crick Ramp wrote:
vitoscotti wrote:
ZZ 10/14 5@5

Generally QB sacks come on passing plays, not running plays. (Oh really)

The next Cubs manager will not be better than Joe Maddon. (That's a scary thought)

Referring to trading Cease, Torres, Eloy. If you're all in for future championships these are moves you have to make. (Maybe could of got Chapman, Q cheaper instead of getting fleeced Zack?)

Theo is still here, and that's what should give you faith running forward.

No one could of imagined Russell being this during the Torres trade. (Weren't there rumblings of Russel's off field life early. On field 2015-242 307 389 696. 2016-238 321 417 738)

Why would a football recruit go to Illinois when other schools have better facilities?


You do realize if a running, bullet point list was made for Mulli, Hanley, McDouche, etc that it would be at least equally as bad.

Grading on a curve for the win


Nah. ZZ and Les are cartoon character like. They have a comedic appeal the others don't.

Author:  billypootons [ Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

vitoscotti wrote:
ZZ 10/14 5@5

Generally QB sacks come on passing plays, not running plays. (Oh really)

The next Cubs manager will not be better than Joe Maddon. (That's a scary thought)

Referring to trading Cease, Torres, Eloy. If you're all in for future championships these are moves you have to make. (Maybe could of got Chapman, Q cheaper instead of getting fleeced Zack?)

Theo is still here, and that's what should give you faith running forward.

No one could of imagined Russell being this during the Torres trade. (Weren't there rumblings of Russel's off field life early. On field 2015-242 307 389 696. 2016-238 321 417 738)

Why would a football recruit go to Illinois when other schools have better facilities?

How many hours per day of wscr programming do you listen? Serious question, look forward to your response

Author:  BigW72 [ Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

Crick Ramp wrote:
You do realize if a running, bullet point list was made for Mulli, Hanley, McDouche, etc that it would be at least equally as bad.

Grading on a curve for the win

ZZ list will top all others in terms of bad takes and homerism....all while being an insufferable listen.

Author:  vitoscotti [ Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

ZZ and Les could be 2 of the biggest clowns in the history of the score. But, they're entertaining listening to them spew company line bs it's hysterical. ZZ taking Cubs phone calls is like Jerry Seinfeld stand-up.

Author:  BigW72 [ Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Why??

I have zero issue with Les. He's.....Les, but I'm good with that.
ZZ....is a complete waste of oxygen and I wish he'd go sell insurance.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/