Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Mornings not the same
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=24029		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  bhuge [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Mornings not the same
Sorry, I don't have anything against either Mulli or Hanley, but it is a very boring morning now with the North gang gone. I just can't get thru the fake laughter like Bob & Tom in the morning. Maybe some people did't like MN, but he was there from the beginning and helped make that station wat is was... yes was. It seems as if the station is on the "cheap" now. Anyway, AM1000 is right down the channel.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Dynomite debut. The North cocksucking line forms over in the appropriately named Media Graveyard folder.
Author:  SHARK [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
bhuge wrote:
Sorry, I don't have anything against either Mulli or Hanley, but it is a very boring morning now with the North gang gone. I just can't get thru the fake laughter like Bob & Tom in the morning. Maybe some people did't like MN, but he was there from the beginning and helped make that station wat is was... yes was. It seems as if the station is on the "cheap" now. Anyway, AM1000 is right down the channel.
Bhuge, I'm sorry you don't care for "Mully & Hanley in the Morning". The two Sun-Times sportswriters, Mike Mulligan & Brian Hanley, are actually very good at what they do, and that's GENUINE CHICAGO SPORTS TALK every weekday morning. If you want shtick, complete with sound effects & "shock jock" material, listen to other morning shows down the dial or listen to the station's Web site on the Internet. When "M & H" took over morning drive, they made it clear that they weren't trying to reinvent the wheel, based on an article I think Ted Cox wrote in the Daily Herald. As for WSCR 670 being "on the cheap" now, I think you might be right. With the exception of Dan Hampton signing on Tuesday with Laurence Holmes, management has been very reluctant to spend CBS Radio's money on replacing hosts that don't cut it & seem to promote its hosts from within. By the way, watch this story carefully. I predict that 'SCR will soon break up "Boers & Bernstein" when Terry's deal expires soon, and Dan will have a new partner. You read it here first. :wink:
Author:  Sarge [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Yes, M & H are much better than Northy, but someone please tell
Mulli to stop yelling at me, when he's trying to be funny/make a point.
Author:  lipidquadcab [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Sarge wrote:
Yes, M & H are much better than Northy, but someone please tell
Mulli to stop yelling at me, when he's trying to be funny/make a point.


Unbelievable![/Mully]
Author:  bhuge [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
I am not saying M&H are bad, it just seems to be a very bland station now.
Author:  Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Ive thought the same thing for more then the past month.
Author:  bigfan [ Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Its why I never wanted North gone, but teamed up with someone that did their homework, that did have information.

If North wouldn't do it, the I agree with letitng him go.

That said, M&H need to bring something in.
Author:  Zeeck [ Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
They may be boring but at least the things they say are backed by a hint of intelligence.
Author:  Peoria Matt [ Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
I'm not quite sure what people were expecting.

I loved the show from 10-12 and I love it now.
Author:  bokeen [ Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
I can see both sides of this. Mully & Hanley do their homework, which leads to very intelligent discussion. However, the discussion isn't particularly entertaining. Mully’s unnecessary shouting is terribly annoying, and Hanely has the personality of a cadaver.

The show is the complete polar opposite of North's old show. While North came off as a meatball 95% of the time, his show was far more entertaining. I reluctantly switched to Mike & Mike, and I haven't looked back.
Author:  hackwilson's ribbies [ Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Yeah, I predominantly listen to Mike 'n' Mike, but during their commercial breaks that seem to take up my entire morning commute (yes, I know that they have to pay the bills), I'll turn on Mully 'n' Hanley and I think they do a decent job. At least they're providing sports talk - not just talking about themselves the ENTIRE time like the former show...
Author:  Wilson A2000 [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Peoria Matt wrote:
I'm not quite sure what people were expecting.

I loved the show from 10-12 and I love it now.


I liked them from 10-12 too, but I just don't think they can keep my attention for a four hour show. They just don't have the personalities.
Author:  newper [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
Wilson A2000 wrote:
I liked them from 10-12 too, but I just don't think they can keep my attention for a four hour show. They just don't have the personalities.

Longing for the days of Morning Murph, Morning Fred...?
Author:  GoldenDomer93 [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
I would love to here Murphy back in the mornings.
Author:  Ex-Media Guy [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mornings not the same
GoldenDomer93 wrote:
I would love to here Murphy back in the mornings.


Why do you continue to draw attention to yourself by misusing "here" and "hear"? I'm curious.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/