| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| bad callers https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=56871 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | bad callers |
what is with all these turds calling in and crying about their salary? stop trying to compare yourself in your 9-5 rat race job to world class athletes. try getting into a car wreck every sunday for 16 plus weeks for a living and then maybe you would have an idea what these guys put their bodies through. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
312player wrote: what is with all these turds calling in and crying about their salary? stop trying to compare yourself in your 9-5 rat race job to world class athletes. try getting into a car wreck every sunday for 16 plus weeks for a living and then maybe you would have an idea what these guys put their bodies through. Whenever there is labor strife some idiot NFL player goes off on salaries and money and slavery and this is, historically, the inevitable backlash. The hammer of "hey! dis guy wud bee pumpin my gas if he wasn't shootin dat basketbaaaaalll" falls right on sports talk radio. How are M&H handling it? I'm sure it will bleed over to B&B today and the "Awww Shucks Everyman" Danny Mac Show today. If it happens on B&B someone is going to need to send those caller tapes to the Radio Hall of Fame. Bernsie will have none of it. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
Bad Callers and Bad Hosts too.....I just listen because ESPN1000 is afraid of going local in that time slot. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
spmack wrote: Bad Callers and Bad Hosts too.....I just listen because ESPN1000 is afraid of going local in that time slot. M&H are absolutely terrible and shouldn't be allowed near a microphone. I've said it before, ESPN could dominate the mornings if they put some local stuff in there and took it seriously. I believe that M&H dominate the mornings and there is absolutely no excuse why that should happen. |
|
| Author: | A7X [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
I'd like to hear J Hood and a competent co-host on ESPN in the morning. They would annihilate M&H in the ratings. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
show is so much better minus mully |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
312player wrote: show is so much better minus mully No its not Its still bad. Mully stumbles into an interesting story once in a while and thats the only good part of the show ever. Hanley is the worst person to ever speak into a microphone and Biggs sounds fat |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
biggs sounds fat because he is, show is still bad yes..but improved imo |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
rogers park bryan wrote: Hanley is the worst person to ever speak into a microphone "and bomb goes the dynamite" guy laughs at this. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
bad show |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
312player wrote: try getting into a car wreck every sunday for 16 plus weeks for a living and then maybe you would have an idea what these guys put their bodies through. I don't care what Robby Gordon goes through. He sucks. |
|
| Author: | Tall Midget [ Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
rogers park bryan wrote: 312player wrote: show is so much better minus mully No its not Its still bad. Mully stumbles into an interesting story once in a while and thats the only good part of the show ever. Hanley is the worst person to ever speak into a microphone and Biggs sounds fat I agree with 312--the show has been way more enjoyable without Mully this week. I especially like Rozner as a partner for Hanley. The idea of pairing Mully with Bernstein appeals to me. They have worked together before and complemented one another quite nicely. |
|
| Author: | Reared on the Score [ Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: bad callers |
Tall Midget wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: 312player wrote: show is so much better minus mully No its not Its still bad. Mully stumbles into an interesting story once in a while and thats the only good part of the show ever. Hanley is the worst person to ever speak into a microphone and Biggs sounds fat I agree with 312--the show has been way more enjoyable without Mully this week. I especially like Rozner as a partner for Hanley. The idea of pairing Mully with Bernstein appeals to me. They have worked together before and complemented one another quite nicely. Yes, the Mully/Bernstein idea is gaining momentum. Though I disagree with Mully's absence helping the morning show. Hanley's just so bad, though for all I know Rozner was great this morning, I immediately PTBF as I assumed it'd be too Hockey-y. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|