Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Mully retires...from the Sun-Times https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=61107 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Reared on the Score [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Quote: Quick Hits, the Sun-Times sports column that showcased the sparkling wit of Elliott Harris along with photos of some of the sports world’s most beautiful women, has taken a hit. Harris, 64, a 32-year veteran of the Sun-Times, was one of three editorial employees whose jobs were eliminated Tuesday. The others were sports columnist Mike Mulligan, who continues as morning co-host on CBS Radio sports/talk WSCR-AM (670), and photographer Keith Hale. Mulligan’s departure was classified as a retirement. http://timeoutchicago.com/arts-culture/ ... %E2%80%98b I'll have to contact the author about considering Harris's 'Sports and Torts' gig as 'in the public eye'. |
Author: | spmack [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
I knew something wasn't right with Mulligan when I noticed that he was on vacation while all of the NFL stuff was coming back, and then the fact that he is back, but has still not made it to Bears camp yet. I guess Mitch and the crew likes all of the yelling and corny jokes. |
Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Damn Mulligan is out of the wrong job. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Elliot Harris' wit does not sparkle. Thank you |
Author: | Phil McCracken [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Does Dim O'Braincell still work there? |
Author: | SHARK [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Phil McCracken wrote: Does Dim O'Braincell still work there? You mean Jim O'Donnell? No, I'm sorry... |
Author: | Phil McCracken [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
SHARK wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: Does Dim O'Braincell still work there? You mean Jim O'Donnell? No, I'm sorry... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! |
Author: | SHARK [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
I think Jim O'Donnell was among several cuts at the Sun-Times a few months ago as the struggling newspaper tries to stay afloat financially... |
Author: | denisdman [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
I was curious what his Score contract pays. You'd think having a full time morning gig would be enough to pay the bills. If that is the case, it's probably for the best. With regards to M&H, I am disappointed by all their Bears negativity already. Their interview with that NFL network guy this morning was a classic example. All the questions were slanted in a negative way towards the Bears. Hanley asked the guest why that Steelers' lineman signed for $3M less than what the Bears had offered and what that says about the Bears as an organization if free agents don't want to come here. The NFL Network guy put Hanley in his place by saying the Bears didn't offer $3M more and in fact the Steelers offered the most money. I am sick of the attack mode against Lovie and his crew. I get the frustration with Jerry and Lovie, but it's not like they're the Panthers. |
Author: | SHARK [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
denisdman wrote: I was curious what his Score contract pays. You'd think having a full time morning gig would be enough to pay the bills. If that is the case, it's probably for the best. With regards to M&H, I am disappointed by all their Bears negativity already. Their interview with that NFL network guy this morning was a classic example. All the questions were slanted in a negative way towards the Bears. Hanley asked the guest why that Steelers' lineman signed for $3M less than what the Bears had offered and what that says about the Bears as an organization if free agents don't want to come here. The NFL Network guy put Hanley in his place by saying the Bears didn't offer $3M more and in fact the Steelers offered the most money. I am sick of the attack mode against Lovie and his crew. I get the frustration with Jerry and Lovie, but it's not like they're the Panthers. I think you are referring to Michael Lombardi, who is one of many talking heads at the NFL Network, and one of the many football analysts 670 The SCORE's big voice guy mentions by name in one of several new promos that started airing within the last week, |
Author: | denisdman [ Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
SHARK wrote: denisdman wrote: I was curious what his Score contract pays. You'd think having a full time morning gig would be enough to pay the bills. If that is the case, it's probably for the best. With regards to M&H, I am disappointed by all their Bears negativity already. Their interview with that NFL network guy this morning was a classic example. All the questions were slanted in a negative way towards the Bears. Hanley asked the guest why that Steelers' lineman signed for $3M less than what the Bears had offered and what that says about the Bears as an organization if free agents don't want to come here. The NFL Network guy put Hanley in his place by saying the Bears didn't offer $3M more and in fact the Steelers offered the most money. I am sick of the attack mode against Lovie and his crew. I get the frustration with Jerry and Lovie, but it's not like they're the Panthers. I think you are referring to Michael Lombardi, who is one of many talking heads at the NFL Network, and one of the many football analysts 670 The SCORE's big voice guy mentions by name in one of several new promos that started airing within the last week, That's probably it. The guy was ok, but I don't recall his name (it was around 7:00). I just hated the tone of their questions where they were trying to get this guy to buy into their Bears hate. All this jumping to conclusions about the offensive line when it's just way too early. The whole team isn't even in camp until tomorrow. I don't need 6 months of complete Bears hatred. And if they win like last year, then I have to hear everyone complain about luck, injuries to the other team, NFL parity NFL, a weak schedule or whatever excuse people use to diminish the Bears (looking at you Rozner). |
Author: | 312player [ Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
spmack wrote: I knew something wasn't right with Mulligan when I noticed that he was on vacation while all of the NFL stuff was coming back, and then the fact that he is back, but has still not made it to Bears camp yet. I guess Mitch and the crew likes all of the yelling and corny jokes. hard to believe but you have to be right..mitch must be one dumb son of a bitch..loho and mulligan are garbage..how are these two turds employed |
Author: | Mark Prior's Calves [ Sun Aug 07, 2011 11:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Does Hanley work for the S-T anymore? |
Author: | spmack [ Sun Aug 07, 2011 11:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Mark Prior's Calves wrote: Does Hanley work for the S-T anymore? He hasn't worked there since 08 or 09. I know he was still there when Mike North was doing Monsters in the Morning. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Feder's coverage of this was strange. He glossed over the fact that they pushed Mulligan out the door but lamented the loss of creepy old Elliott Harris and his beautiful women. |
Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
rogers park bryan wrote: Elliot Harris' wit does not sparkle. Thank you +1!!!!!! |
Author: | SHARK [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Curious Hair wrote: Feder's coverage of this was strange. He glossed over the fact that they pushed Mulligan out the door but lamented the loss of creepy old Elliott Harris and his beautiful women. I think the "beautiful women" Feder was referring involved photos of Anna Kournikova, former LOOP "Rock Girl" April Rose, ESPN/ABC's Erin Andrews and others that Elliott always posted in his "Quick Hits" byline... |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
SHARK wrote: Curious Hair wrote: Feder's coverage of this was strange. He glossed over the fact that they pushed Mulligan out the door but lamented the loss of creepy old Elliott Harris and his beautiful women. I think the "beautiful women" Feder was referring involved photos of Anna Kournikova, former LOOP "Rock Girl" April Rose, ESPN/ABC's Erin Andrews and others that Elliott always posted in his "Quick Hits" byline... The Curious Hair-SHARK feud continues.... |
Author: | SHARK [ Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
rogers park bryan wrote: SHARK wrote: Curious Hair wrote: Feder's coverage of this was strange. He glossed over the fact that they pushed Mulligan out the door but lamented the loss of creepy old Elliott Harris and his beautiful women. I think the "beautiful women" Feder was referring involved photos of Anna Kournikova, former LOOP "Rock Girl" April Rose, ESPN/ABC's Erin Andrews and others that Elliott always posted in his "Quick Hits" byline... The Curious Hair-SHARK feud continues.... ????? |
Author: | Reared on the Score [ Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Mully now contributing to the Tribune. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/co ... .columnist |
Author: | newper [ Wed Sep 07, 2011 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mully retires...from the Sun-Times |
Reared on the Score wrote: Brad Biggs writes football with you.... |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |