AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
You're just baiting us now, right!?!??!?!?!???!!?!?
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Why? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=65142 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Why? |
Did Larry never get a shot at this time slot? Why has Larry never been a guest host of this show? Why did Larrys show fail, even when this show, who gave them the highest morning ratings they ever had, turned it over to Larry? Just asking why? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH You're just baiting us now, right!?!??!?!?!???!!?!? |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
I need answers |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Racists? |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
1. Not a good answer for #1 2. But what about all the other black people they have had work for them and on the air during M&H ...what about...and....that one time...uhmmm.....hmmmm? 
|
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Green is the color Rod Z is most interested in. I think Rod would love to have a Black and White team kicking ass ratings wise. But his job is not to develop these guys and to be honest, it's nobodys job to "develop" them. It's who delivers the ratings for the best $$$$ and to date, M&H win that battle. It's a fact you can't dispute. Like them or hate them, the $$$$$'s are there. Herb should get more airtime ahead of Jason or Larry. Ranger should have a show, not sponsored by the Sox. Connor will be a good host, alone or with someone else that he does not sound like. Finfer will replace Les one day. Abbatacola would be awesome with a real full time show and some security! Madd Matty is good radio! |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Keeping Score wrote: It is a good answer for #1. Isn't Jiggetts the only brother to host in that time slot? You forgetting "The Bull & The Bear"? Van Lier & Buffone |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Correct! Matty and Ranger, too much of the same thing. But you have to love the way they keep stringing guys along. |
|
| Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
We're seeing the beginning of the end of Big Fan's sanity. Write your will now Big Fan. Because soon, you won't be of sound mind. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Also going to argue M&H best morning team they ever had, measured per ratings? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
The Original Kid Cairo wrote: We're seeing the beginning of the end of Big Fan's sanity. Write your will now Big Fan. Because soon, you won't be of sound mind. At first I just thought it was a joke or maybe he was a bit tired or didn't have his coffee....then it kept happening, Larry this, M&H are awesome that. I thought it just might be a new found love for Oxycontin or model glue, but it became more pervasive, more terrifying, more in your face. Then came the Playboy mags with pictures of Mulligan and Bigesy taped over the naked chicks, tattoo's and bathroom stall impeccadilloes with his radio hero's.... We can't escape it and neither can he, it's his own personal hell. Welcome to your nightmare, BigFan. Hopefully you wake up soon. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
bigfan wrote: Also going to argue M&H best morning team they ever had, measured per ratings? WHO GIVES A SHIT. How many people saw Twilight or the last 5 Adam Sandler movies? THIS IS BULLSHIT, BIGFAN! |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
5:09 AM, you're missing 9 minutes! WAKE UP |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
You could put Memolo and Hood in that slot and have a better show. |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
why do I have the Asian women pics on the dating site banner? Damn bot is recording text now, I see. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
bigfan wrote: Did Larry never get a shot at this time slot? When would that have been? The timing was never there. bigfan wrote: Why has Larry never been a guest host of this show? Because Mulligan has some sense and wouldnt bring in a much more entertaining host as a fill in....that wouldnt be good. Also, M and H's audience is not sophisticated enough to appreciate good radio. bigfan wrote: Why did Larrys show fail, even when this show, who gave them the highest morning ratings they ever had, turned it over to Larry? Because his partner had trouble speaking, which is a big part of being a talk show host. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
No, not over the top at all... |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
bigfan wrote: 5:09 AM, you're missing 9 minutes! WAKE UP I did! A little later but still at around 615am and the show STILL SUCKED! You're the one who needs to WAKE UP, BigFan, before it's to late! |
|
| Author: | mcbrides [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
I'm with you big man |
|
| Author: | C_Howitt_Fealz [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Yikes - their discussion with Zaidman was painful to listen to. KC Johnson wasn't much better. |
|
| Author: | No Clever Moniker [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
bigfan wrote: Did Larry never get a shot at this time slot? Why has Larry never been a guest host of this show? Why did Larrys show fail, even when this show, who gave them the highest morning ratings they ever had, turned it over to Larry? Just asking why? The show failed because despite the attempt to recreate a Jiggetts & North, Larry didn't have enough talent to carry the unintelligible Hamp. That notion hasn't been completely forgotten by management which is why he's still around. Why he's not a guest is because the two hosts are former newspapermen and know that such a relative flyweight would diminished their regular guests more weightier stature, other newspapermen who cover sports. From who Larry gets his information. Which is why I often wish there were a third station (other major metros have such) that would be willing to get the two current incarnations out of their lazy comfort zones. How either Larry or Harry have existed in such a large market is something that makes no sense. |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Keeping Score wrote: Have you ever pruned one of your own threads?  
|
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
No Clever Moniker wrote: The show failed because despite the attempt to recreate a Jiggetts & North, Larry didn't have enough talent to carry the unintelligible Hamp. I truly believe that there are radio execs in this town who actually think the recipe for the success of North & Jiggetts was simply one black guy and one white guy. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Mully talking about Hanies number of reps: "Even if Hanie gets "999.999.99" percent of the reps..." Hanley cuts in: "Whoa,slow down there,Herman Cain." I giggled. BF is RIGHT. These two guys take a lot of abuse which is misguided. I prefer Hanley more than Mully,but they are OK. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
Atta boy, Jimmy. They'll all come around sooner or later. |
|
| Author: | Reared on the Score [ Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why? |
jimmypasta wrote: Mully talking about Hanies number of reps: "Even if Hanie gets "999.999.99" percent of the reps..." Hanley cuts in: "Whoa,slow down there,Herman Cain. Hanley scale? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|