I listened yesterday and this morning for a few minutes. Something else I noticed is the way Mulley asks a question....which isn't really a question at all. It's more of a "hear is a talking point, now agree with me and talk more about it". Or, by the time he's done with the question he'a added so much to it and changed direction so many times that it is unrecongnizable...

I listened yesterday and this morning for a few minutes. Something else I noticed is the way Mulley asks a question....which isn't really a question at all. It's more of a "hear is a talking point, now agree with me and talk more about it". Or, by the time he's done with the question he'a added so much to it and changed direction so many times that it is unrecongnizable...

"Some insight"....that can't make up for the other 99.5% of absolutely radio shit that comprises this show. Interviews that go nowhere, where you can feel the guy rolling his eyes at M&H as they do their best to sabotage the interview...fake laughter at everyone....dumb everything.

I'm also still waiting for this mythical "inside info" that these idiots possess in spades? I'm also still waiting for those awesome questions they pepper the guest with? I'm still waiting for the supposed "hilarious stories" that Mully belts out every 30 min.

Whatever. The show blows and it is both of their faults. They both need to be held accountable for what they have done and continue to do.

I'll listen from time to time when I'm up for an early, early day at work...with the hope that it will above terrible or at least be listenable...and I'm disappointed every time.

Its not Hanley, Its Mully


Hanley is a master of the bad joke. This is true. (Even referred to as Henny Youngman with an attitude in a 1992 review of the Score posted by Panther)

But its only so bad because Mulligan pulls it out of him.

Mulligan makes almost as many bad jokes, but they are met with silence and glossed over.


When Hanley does one, Mulli overlaughs making it terrible.

See, bad jokes CAN be funny. Someone makes a terrible joke or pun and you say HA! sarcastically and its a funny little exchange.

That could be Hanley's role.

But Mulligan will have none of that.

He is trying to make this vanilla morning sports talk show a goofy sports morning talk show and its just NOT


And let me add, that Mulligan is terrible as a speaker.

Again,

This idea that,

Look, Keith Bogans wasnt working out


97% of his sentences start with one of those 3.


It seems Mulligan has this idea in his head of what a sports talk show should be and he tries to force it on his current show.

He should just play it straight. As a straight vanilla sports talk show...its fine.


Oh and add in that Mulligan knows very little about baseball and less about basketball.



These guys are both second bananas. They both could be good as a second guy but they have ratings so why rock the boat.


Hanley, at least, provides some insight.

:lol: @this thread.

"You know why this show sucks? Because the host we thought was bad isn't as bad as the other guy, but the fist guy we thought was bad is still pretty fucking bad. Its just that the other guy makes it worse."


Mully is also a dumbass too. He was bitching Monday about Notre Dame losing in the tourny. Said the refs should have swallowed their whistle and not called a lane violation.

Dude, its a VIOLATION! The kid broke the rule. Be mad at the rule or the kid, but don't say the refs should have swallowed their whistle. Should an umpire not call a runner out if he beats a throw but never touches the base just because its the 9th inning? Fuck no..

As in Look, Keith Bogans wasn't working out but you can get 5 beef and cheddars for Arby's for 5 dollars.....or Look, Keith Bogans wasn't working out but Jamie Lee Curtis was born with both male and female genitalia

You cannot get male and female genitalia at Arby's, no matter how often you ask. Trust me.

You sir are going to the wrong Arby's.

I listened yesterday and this morning for a few minutes. Something else I noticed is the way Mulley asks a question....which isn't really a question at all. It's more of a "hear is a talking point, now agree with me and talk more about it". Or, by the time he's done with the question he'a added so much to it and changed direction so many times that it is unrecongnizable...

Its not Hanley, Its Mully

Or, by the time he's done with the question he'a added so much to it and changed direction so many times that it is unrecongnizable...

He indeed does this a lot, but Boers is the absolute and unquestioned master of this. Boers' "questions" are so inane, meandering, and just plain LONG, I'm surprised his guests don't forget they're alive and doing a talk-radio interview.