If the Sox have 2 additional games in which to accumulate, wins, saves, home runs, etc....how does that figure into the Cubs/Sox wagers??? Should everything be based on the totals accumulated in the first 161 games??? Otherwise taking additional stats from those extra 2 games, flies in the face of fair play and equity. Where is the even playing field that all wagoring and competition should be based upon???

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

Only 1 game is actually extra

_________________
Paws Up

But there will be a 2 game disparity in games played, based upon the fact that the Cubs/Astro's game was not made up.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

The tiebreaker aka "163rd" game is really considered a playoff game. That's why TBS gets to show it.

White Sox vs Twins... Very funny...

The 163rd game counts as regular season (tbs must have negotiated in though) They were talking about the RBI lead tonight because morneau was 1 back so if he had 2 tonight he would have been recognized as the league leader.

So, since the HRs are tied up...

Most wins in the playoffs as the tiebreaker, fellas?

_________________

No. It's a tie. That's perfect in a year the Cubs and Sox both make the playoffs.

So just have all 3 of you guys cook next year. What's wrong with that? You can invite Cubs and Sox fans to the tailgate next year. Unlike in years past when you only let the winner's fans go to the tailgate.

I think they have a tie-breaker already. I believe it was either total runs or run differential in the head to head games. If not, I smell a web poll question...Or was that Jurko???

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!

The original bets should just extend through the first round. If it's still tied at that point, then they can get it catered or Mac can cook (because he enjoys it so much anyway).

Besides, even if Mac won, it would still be catered....

_________________