Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

The Logic of Jeff Dickerson
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=20076
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Coast2Coast [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:  The Logic of Jeff Dickerson

JD is bringing his enthusiasm today about the Final Four. I for one, love it. I greatly appreciate his interest in college hoops and his reports have been pretty solid. But I have to take issue with something he just said because Mac and Jurko did not. He said Memphis is not a good matchup for UCLA, because "UCLA did not face any athletic teams like Memphis in the Pac Ten." Huh? Since when does one's opponents or conference affiliation determine a team's capabilities? Just because UCLA hasn't faced many athletic teams in Memphis' class doesn't mean they can't match up with one.

So let's use JD's logic and turn it around: Memphis didn't play against any strong defenses in Conference USA. So does that mean Memphis can't play against good defenses?

This is the kind of JD logic that puzzles me sometimes. A team can't match up with an opponent because they haven't had the opportunity to prove it all year?

Author:  Brick [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

Is USC not an athletic team?

Author:  My_name_1s_MUD [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is USC not an athletic team?


Agreed.

Author:  Coast2Coast [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yes they are, Rick. :lol: Not only is his premise flawed but his facts underlying his premise are wrong also. Arizona and Oregon were pretty athletic too. Not in Memphis' class, but other than Carolina, who is?

Author:  HappyHour Jason [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

Email that in for Critics....

Author:  Coast2Coast [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

Nah. By Tuesday, Memphis will have beaten UCLA and won the title and it would look pretty silly. :lol: I do think Memphis will beat UCLA, but not because of who they have played during the season.

Author:  HappyHour Jason [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

I've got Memphis going all the way in my bracket...

Author:  Coast2Coast [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

Memphis looked like the best team last week, so you have that going for you, which is nice. Most media analysts and fans are influenced most by what they saw in the last game or two. So the Memphis love is not a surprise. He's not the only one.

Author:  FavreFan [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:18 pm ]
Post subject: 

I dont know, Im sticking with my G'Town over Texas prediction. I dont like Memphis.

Author:  spmack [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

FavreFan wrote:
I dont like Memphis.


Hmm.....I wonder why...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ldhoN3ZNO18

Author:  Fargin Bastage [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

I put a hun-do down on Drake to the elite 8 yesterday. Liv'in the TI-VO life could come back to haunt me but I like the Bulldogs gunners because....well..."they can shoot".

Terry, is that you cackling??

Author:  FavreFan [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

spmack wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I dont like Memphis.


Hmm.....I wonder why...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ldhoN3ZNO18


Sorry Jesse.

Author:  M_C [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'm with you FF, my G'Town championship pick is not only solid but brilliant When do I collect my money?

Author:  FavreFan [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

M_C wrote:
I'm with you FF, my G'Town championship pick is not only solid but brilliant When do I collect my money?


When Roy Hibbert becomes a decent NBA player.

Author:  buckeyejake [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

im takin kansas. im not sure memphis can even beat ucla.

Author:  good dolphin [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Logic of Jeff Dickerson

Coast2Coast wrote:
JD is bringing his enthusiasm today about the Final Four. I for one, love it. I greatly appreciate his interest in college hoops and his reports have been pretty solid. But I have to take issue with something he just said because Mac and Jurko did not. He said Memphis is not a good matchup for UCLA, because "UCLA did not face any athletic teams like Memphis in the Pac Ten." Huh? Since when does one's opponents or conference affiliation determine a team's capabilities? Just because UCLA hasn't faced many athletic teams in Memphis' class doesn't mean they can't match up with one.

So let's use JD's logic and turn it around: Memphis didn't play against any strong defenses in Conference USA. So does that mean Memphis can't play against good defenses?

This is the kind of JD logic that puzzles me sometimes. A team can't match up with an opponent because they haven't had the opportunity to prove it all year?


I see your point but let's not lose the fact that he did a great job of reporting and highlighting each team. Good call by MJH for extending the Dickerson time on Friday and a reporting job well done by Dickerson.

Author:  Coast2Coast [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

I agree dolphin. I picked at one thing, but as I said above, his reports were solid and it was great that MJH devoted so much time to college hoops by having four hits on Friday. That was really a great way to do it...a breakdown on each team. Big shoutout to JD and MJH. I'll look forward to his take on Monday.

Author:  BD [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

Coast2Coast wrote:
I agree dolphin. I picked at one thing, but as I said above, his reports were solid and it was great that MJH devoted so much time to college hoops by having four hits on Friday. That was really a great way to do it...a breakdown on each team. Big shoutout to JD and MJH. I'll look forward to his take on Monday.


Agreed - good posting. I didn't hear all of his reports, but the two I did hear were very good. Like you, I'm surprised that MJH bothered to put that much time into it. Hopefully, they spend some time on Monday wrapping up the weekend, and previewing the championship.

Author:  Beef Rockmore [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Logic of Jeff Dickerson

Coast2Coast wrote:
JD is bringing his enthusiasm today about the Final Four. I for one, love it. I greatly appreciate his interest in college hoops and his reports have been pretty solid. But I have to take issue with something he just said because Mac and Jurko did not. He said Memphis is not a good matchup for UCLA, because "UCLA did not face any athletic teams like Memphis in the Pac Ten." Huh? Since when does one's opponents or conference affiliation determine a team's capabilities? Just because UCLA hasn't faced many athletic teams in Memphis' class doesn't mean they can't match up with one.

So let's use JD's logic and turn it around: Memphis didn't play against any strong defenses in Conference USA. So does that mean Memphis can't play against good defenses?

This is the kind of JD logic that puzzles me sometimes. A team can't match up with an opponent because they haven't had the opportunity to prove it all year?


JD has spoken damn it!

Author:  Woodridge Ryan [ Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:37 am ]
Post subject: 

Coast2Coast wrote:
Nah. By Tuesday, Memphis will have beaten UCLA and won the title and it would look pretty silly. :lol: I do think Memphis will beat UCLA, but not because of who they have played during the season.


Right on

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/