Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
What were the numbers Mac. https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=22993 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | STU-GOTZ [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:59 am ] |
Post subject: | What were the numbers Mac. |
I saw you guys beat the Score 1.6 to a 1.5 which is like kissing your sister but you said you guys ran away with the ratings in your time slot but I have not seen the numbers..Post what you have their buddy and if you have Norths numbers I would be curious to see what he did. Let us know Mackey. |
Author: | Mac Sucks [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
In the 25-54 demo they pulled an impressive 0.0 with people who have a triple digit IQ. |
Author: | man of few opinions [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
Mac Sucks wrote: In the 25-54 demo they pulled an impressive 0.0 with people who have a triple digit IQ. |
Author: | City of Fools [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
that's probably true of any sports talk show... |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
i highly doubt that the average I.Q. on this board is under 100. |
Author: | STU-GOTZ [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
doug - evergreen park wrote: i highly doubt that the average I.Q. on this board is under 100. Lets find out how smart we really are. Take the IQ test . Post your score and be honest. http://web.tickle.com/quizzes/show/3001 |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
146 |
Author: | Eaglo Jeff [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
110 |
Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
Is 52 good or bad? |
Author: | Seamus [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
133 |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
126 |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
129 |
Author: | man of few opinions [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
135 |
Author: | STU-GOTZ [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
98..wtf... |
Author: | shultzyy [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
118 |
Author: | WestmontMike [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
I'm pretty sure mine is broken. It said 142, but I'm pretty much a moron. |
Author: | WestmontMike [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
dammit |
Author: | conns7901 [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
139 |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
287 |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: 287 And the best you could do was Purdue? |
Author: | Slap Shot ED [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
186 !!I took it 3 times and got 62,63 and 61. Romeoville High is very proud. |
Author: | reents [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
95 |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
Oh hello, professor! |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
112 over 63 a little low.....but I'm on medication. |
Author: | My Coach Vinny [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
144 |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
Colonel Angus wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: 287 And the best you could do was Purdue? Unfortunately, that was also my SAT score. |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
and tall midget's IQ... |
Author: | chaspoppcap [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
damn only 122 |
Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
i'm impressed chas. well done. |
Author: | chaspoppcap [ Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What were the numbers Mac. |
doug - evergreen park wrote: i'm impressed chas. well done. thanks but im on pain meds right now so |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |