Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Harry vs Bruce? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=32497 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Wed May 13, 2009 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Harry vs Bruce? |
Waddle & Silvy made a reference to Harry & Bruce getting into it recently. Anyone know what was said? |
Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Wed May 13, 2009 12:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Anyone know what was said? "You're fat and your jokes aren't funny" "You're old and you sound like a gay" |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed May 13, 2009 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
harry wants michael wuertz to be the closer...Bruce thinks he's foolish |
Author: | Vincent Antonelli [ Wed May 13, 2009 1:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
I gotta side with Harry on this one. He said bruce is too Murph-like in his blindly defending anything Hendry does, this time in reference to the DeRosa trade. I hope harry and bruce argue about it, those two butting heads is so painfully annoying that it is must listen. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed May 13, 2009 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
The Boss would take him very easily. |
Author: | Tad Queasy [ Wed May 13, 2009 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Did Bruce tell him that without him, he wouldn't have a job? |
Author: | Mac [ Wed May 13, 2009 3:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Vincent Antonelli (or was it Todd Wilkinson?) wrote: I hope harry and bruce argue about it, those two butting heads is so painfully annoying that it is must listen. Have at it, Vinnie. These are among the things on which I never need waste a minute of time. Murphy and Bruce blindly defending the Cubs should be parked. Those are givens. Michael Weurtz to close is the issue here, right? The button is a beautiful thing. I been on the Drive and 'XRT a lot lately. |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Wed May 13, 2009 3:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
As a Cubs fan I get tired of Bruce defending EVERY single move the Cubs do. Like saying Lee is one of the toughest guys in baseball and has been dealing with this neck injury for over 2 years now. Really than take some fucking off Lee because your not helping us, your hurting us more with your 210 average. Screw Bruce"old saggy balls" Levine. |
Author: | DegenerateDave [ Wed May 13, 2009 3:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Chris_in_joliet wrote: As a Cubs fan I get tired of Bruce defending EVERY single move the Cubs do. Like saying Lee is one of the toughest guys in baseball and has been dealing with this neck injury for over 2 years now. Really than take some fucking off Lee because your not helping us, your hurting us more with your 210 average. Screw Bruce"old saggy balls" Levine. Chris - couldn't agree more. When Bruce looks at his paycheck every week, you would think he sees Tribune Company as the payee instead of ESPN 1000. I know he doesn't want to hurt the relationship he has with the Cubs but jesus, enough a$$ kissing already - hendry can do no wrong in his eyes and if he tells us again how lucky we are to have ozzie and lou as managers in Chicago I am going to throw up. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu May 14, 2009 7:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Mac wrote: Vincent Antonelli (or was it Todd Wilkinson?) wrote: I hope harry and bruce argue about it, those two butting heads is so painfully annoying that it is must listen. Have at it, Vinnie. These are among the things on which I never need waste a minute of time. Murphy and Bruce blindly defending the Cubs should be parked. Those are givens. Michael Weurtz to close is the issue here, right? The button is a beautiful thing. I been on the Drive and 'XRT a lot lately. I was joking about that MAC I havent listened to the show recently...the michael wuertz thing DID happen it was 2006 I think...I kinda like when old man levineline gets his adult diapers all up in a bunch...an old man jerk is funny to me...i dont know why |
Author: | Vincent Antonelli [ Thu May 14, 2009 9:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Come on Mac you have to admit hearing an annoying cubs alser old man argue with an annoying not as old never was comedian cub alser over stupid shit is about the best afternoon sports radio in this town has to offer, which is probably why I listen to Sirius on the ride home. Do you smile everyday knowing an albatross has been released from you? |
Author: | good dolphin [ Fri May 15, 2009 3:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
DegenerateDave wrote: Chris_in_joliet wrote: As a Cubs fan I get tired of Bruce defending EVERY single move the Cubs do. Like saying Lee is one of the toughest guys in baseball and has been dealing with this neck injury for over 2 years now. Really than take some fucking off Lee because your not helping us, your hurting us more with your 210 average. Screw Bruce"old saggy balls" Levine. Chris - couldn't agree more. When Bruce looks at his paycheck every week, you would think he sees Tribune Company as the payee instead of ESPN 1000. I know he doesn't want to hurt the relationship he has with the Cubs but jesus, enough a$$ kissing already - hendry can do no wrong in his eyes and if he tells us again how lucky we are to have ozzie and lou as managers in Chicago I am going to throw up. But, in reality, he does see Tribune Company on his checks. Bruce also works for Vine Line. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Fri May 15, 2009 3:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Harry vs Bruce? |
Mac wrote: Vincent Antonelli (or was it Todd Wilkinson?) wrote: I hope harry and bruce argue about it, those two butting heads is so painfully annoying that it is must listen. Have at it, Vinnie. These are among the things on which I never need waste a minute of time. Murphy and Bruce blindly defending the Cubs should be parked. Those are givens. Michael Weurtz to close is the issue here, right? The button is a beautiful thing. I been on the Drive and 'XRT a lot lately. I have never understood how he is not taken to task for his conflict of interest. He receives a paycheck from a subsidiary of the Cubs. Don't ethics or your industry dictate that you reveal the conflict of interest at the end of each report? I'm not saying he has to be excluded from reporting on the Cubs or that his reporting is faulty. However, there is a conflict, and the consumer should know about it so that he can give that information the proper weight when consuming Bruce's work. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |